dan wrote:
>
> I think i may just add -I to the rsync commands. I have looked through
> config.pl but I only see a single rsync args section, not one for fulls and
> incrementals.
In Rsync.pm, --ignore-times is added to the args for full runs.
--
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
rsync should not(i mean, it is designed not) assume that a file exists under
any circumstances. It should still check every file's mtime.
I think i may just add -I to the rsync commands. I have looked through
config.pl but I only see a single rsync args section, not one for fulls and
incrementa
backuppc will even send warning emails for disabled hosts! you must remove
the email notify address!
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Craig Barratt <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John writes:
>
> > We were having a weird problem with nmblookup firing for a host that
> > was disabled with:
> >
> >
I guess I never thought to say this before but I run 2 local DNS servers. I
have DHCP update DNS so that I can have an acurate local name service and
dont have to rely on nmb or wins.
I find that many network services run significantly faster with this setup.
I also have my remote dhcp servers up
not to hijack the thread here but this is not just a valid point, but a very
inteligent point. Picking a specific stable distro and package list allows
a person to maintain all identical setups, document the system and the
configuration, and redeploy identical systems. I run ubuntu 7.04 with
back
the real difference between an rsync full and incremental in backuppc are
the 3 following
1) a full has rsync ignore matching mtimes and checksum all files while and
incremental trusts matching mtimes
2)backuppc has a different keep/delete schedule for fulls vs incrementals.
3)an incremental backu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yohoo!
| I know File::RsyncP handles --checksum-seed as it's mentioned in the
| config file and we're using it, but I think -z might not work. Try
| again without -z. You can use SSH compression if you want to compress
| the datatransfer.
Looks like y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Just a quick simple question. When using Samba as a transport protocol
> (on BackupPC version: 2.0.2 if it makes any difference) for a Full
> backup will it transfer all of the file data when it detects a change?
> Also how does it check for changes, does it look a
Just a quick simple question. When using Samba as a transport protocol (on
BackupPC version: 2.0.2 if it makes any difference) for a Full backup will
it transfer all of the file data when it detects a change? Also how does
it check for changes, does it look at the modified time of a file or doe
Christian Völker wrote:
> Now the backup is running for hours and nothing is happening.
>
> (...)
>
> So what is going on there?
Ask strace.
> I added the "-z --checksum-seed=32761" parameters to rsync. Could this
> be related?
I know File::RsyncP handles --checksum-seed as it's mentioned in t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yohoo!
Another question from me in trying to understand the way BackupPC works.
I have a full rsync backup scheduled for one of my hosts.
Now the backup is running for hours and nothing is happening.
What did I check?
- -tcpdump on the client serve
11 matches
Mail list logo
