Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

2016-01-21 Thread Gandalf Corvotempesta
2016-01-21 12:41 GMT+01:00 Adam Goryachev : > Try changing the sharename, see if it makes a difference. You could try > "complete" or similar. Worst case, it makes no difference, but best > case, it will solve your problem, and provide a big clue about a bug.

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

2016-01-21 Thread Gandalf Corvotempesta
2016-01-21 11:44 GMT+01:00 Adam Goryachev : > Silly question but have you named the host full or the share full? > A lot of your logs that you posted seemed to have full as one of those > names. It could be confusing bpc and it's unlikely that anyone has >

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

2016-01-21 Thread Adam Goryachev
On 21/01/2016 22:22, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > 2016-01-21 12:16 GMT+01:00 Adam Goryachev > : >> OK, I'd suggest to try changing this to something else. Usually I would >> backup / which obviously means the whole server (ie, root folder and >> everything

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

2016-01-21 Thread Adam Goryachev
On 21 January 2016 8:42:23 pm AEDT, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: >2016-01-21 10:23 GMT+01:00 Gandalf Corvotempesta >: >> This is what I see from control panel during copying #5 => #4 (right >now) > >Copy finished now is running a

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

2016-01-21 Thread Gandalf Corvotempesta
2016-01-21 10:23 GMT+01:00 Gandalf Corvotempesta : > This is what I see from control panel during copying #5 => #4 (right now) Copy finished now is running a backup (seems to be an incremental) In status column I see: "backup full" and in Type column: "incr" What

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

2016-01-21 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > > This is what I see from control panel during copying #5 => #4 (right now) > > If I understood properly, only last backup should be filled. This > seems ok in my environment, > as all except #5 are

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

2016-01-21 Thread Gandalf Corvotempesta
2016-01-21 16:30 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell : > V4 does it backwards from v3. The last backup is always filled and > the older ones are changed to reverse deltas. It must move/copy > things around to arrange that. And the full and incremental runs > aren't tied to keeping

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

2016-01-21 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > 2016-01-21 16:30 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell : >> V4 does it backwards from v3. The last backup is always filled and >> the older ones are changed to reverse deltas. It must

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

2016-01-21 Thread Gandalf Corvotempesta
2016-01-21 18:43 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell : > I see some earlier mail list messages saying that is normal: > http://sourceforge.net/p/backuppc/mailman/message/34478542/ > I guess that's when it removes files that are not in any current > backup. Apparently it only takes a

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

2016-01-21 Thread Gandalf Corvotempesta
2016-01-21 23:58 GMT+01:00 Stephen : > I have glanced at the code and also believe that BackupPC_fsck is running > unnecessarily after every backup attempt, whether it is successful or not. Please check if you have a file called "needFsck.dump" in your refCnt directory.

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

2016-01-21 Thread Adam Goryachev
On 22/01/16 09:58, Stephen wrote: > I have glanced at the code and also believe that BackupPC_fsck is running > unnecessarily after every backup attempt, whether it is successful or not. > > In my xferLogs, BackupPC_refCountUpdate is being called twice at the end of > a backup. Once like this: > >

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

2016-01-21 Thread Gandalf Corvotempesta
2016-01-21 23:09 GMT+01:00 Adam Goryachev : > Can you run dmesg, and see if you have any lines like this: > [11613050.504117] rsync_bpc[7279]: segfault at 7f9ee5c7e428 ip > 004473af sp 7ffc3d7bdf80 error 4 in rsync_bpc[40+75000] > > There seems

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

2016-01-21 Thread Stephen
I have glanced at the code and also believe that BackupPC_fsck is running unnecessarily after every backup attempt, whether it is successful or not. In my xferLogs, BackupPC_refCountUpdate is being called twice at the end of a backup. Once like this: Xfer PIDs are now Running

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

2016-01-21 Thread Adam Goryachev
On 22/01/16 05:45, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > 2016-01-21 18:43 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell : >> I see some earlier mail list messages saying that is normal: >> http://sourceforge.net/p/backuppc/mailman/message/34478542/ >> I guess that's when it removes files that are not in

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

2016-01-21 Thread Adam Goryachev
On 22/01/16 04:43, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta > wrote: >> 2016-01-21 16:30 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell : >>> V4 does it backwards from v3. The last backup is always filled and >>> the older

Re: [BackupPC-users] BPC 4 very slow

2016-01-21 Thread Adam Goryachev
On 22/01/16 09:20, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > 2016-01-21 23:09 GMT+01:00 Adam Goryachev > : >> Can you run dmesg, and see if you have any lines like this: >> [11613050.504117] rsync_bpc[7279]: segfault at 7f9ee5c7e428 ip >> 004473af sp