On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 14:20:34 +0100 (BST)
"G.W. Haywood via BackupPC-users"
wrote:
Hi G.W.,
> You will need to test the performance yourself. Performance can be
> improved by avoiding disc writes, which will take orders of magnitude
> longer than reading RAM. ZFS checksums are in RAM, so you mig
Hi there,
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 B wrote:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, Stefan Schumacher wrote:
I want to set up a new zfs volume as storage for Backuppc. I plan on
using the zfs features encryption, deduplication and compression.
Unless you have an _absolute_ need, do NOT use deduplication into ZFS
Hi Stefan,
what you are describing is the way bpc 3 does it.
In v4, the newest backup will be filled and all incrementals will
reference this backup.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
i.A. Christopher Diekkamp
Am 03.04.2019 um 13:56 schrieb Stefan Schumacher:
> Hello,
>
> (It seems this ma
Am I the only one having this kind of errors, or the only one caring
about the errors ?
Cheers
Daniel
Le 12/03/2019 à 08:56, Daniel Berteaud a écrit :
>
> Hi.
>
> I've been using BackupPC since the past 13 years (starting with 2.1.2
> I think), with great success. I'm now running a few installa
Hello,
(It seems this mail was discarded since I was not yet a member of this list
when I sent it)
I have a question regarding "filling" and levels of incrementation.
Let's have a look at one of my hosts. To me this look wrong: There are three
incremental backups (62,63,64)
but there is no pre
