Perhaps there's a difference in rsync arguments? In particular,
"--hard-links" ?
BPCv4 default arguments:
$Conf{RsyncArgs} = [
'--super',
'--recursive',
'--protect-args',
'--numeric-ids',
'--perms',
'--owner',
'--group',
'-D',
'--times',
'--links',
Look again at your RsyncArgs, they don't match the defaults [1], though
obviously your system may justify it:
-o, --owner
This option causes rsync to set the owner of the destination file to be
the same as the source file, but only if the receiving rsync is being
run
as the
>
>
>
> XferLOG.[backup number] does not contain any individual file
> names/paths, so I'm not able to check the permissions there. Latest
> test XferLOG attached for reference.
>
>
I have "--log-format=log: %o %i %B %8U,%8G %9l %f%L" and "--stats" as
RsyncArgs, by default. Perhaps those will
If I remember correctly (my BPC installation is now retired), all you need
to do is enter your existing user uid/sn in the hosts file.
I think you want per-client "More Users". These will probably need to be
specified individually for your existing clients, but I'm sure you can add
it to the
>
> What I actually do is have a single separate config file for each of
> my platforms (Linux, Windows, Android, RPI) and then have my
> individual machines link to their corresponding canonical file.
I tend to make use of the "newhost=oldhost" syntax when creating new Backup
clients. Do you
I'm wondering if the BackupPC user (or whichever user is theoretically
working with smbclient) has permissions all the way up the tree on
/var/lib/samba/lock? Perhaps something changed within that directory
(selinux policies?).
>
>
___
BackupPC-users
All,
Thanks for the suggestions and links. There's a lot of interesting reading
to be done. But as noted, checksum matching and storage latency are
probably prohibitive.
I hope to have access to a colo with gigabit bandwidth in the near future.
Maybe I'll spin up an instance just to see how it
This hasn't been addressed for a while, and I didn't find anything in
recent archives.
Anybody have any experience or hypothetical issues with writing the BPC4
Pool over s3fs-fuse to S3 or something similar? Pros, Cons?
Thanks,
-Kris
Kris Lou
k...@themusiclink.net
Updated Docs (4.x) are here: https://backuppc.github.io/backuppc/
And no problems here with larger files (18GB) using rsync.exe from Cygwin.
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:
https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc/wiki/Installing-BackupPC-4-from-tarball-or-git-on-Ubuntu
Alternatively, for CentOS 7 you can use the Hobbes COPR:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hobbes1069/BackupPC/
There's another maintained CentOS repo:
http://repo.firewall-services.com/centos/
Not a FreeNAS user (don't know how many, if any, are on the list). But I
think you're looking for this:
https://www.ixsystems.com/community/threads/quickstart-guide-for-backuppc-4-in-a-jail-on-freenas.74080/
Also ...
Since FreeNAS 11.2, there is an official plugin for BackupPC but it is
>
Mine is pretty much stock.
config.pl snippet
#
# Ssh arguments for rsync to run ssh to connect to the client.
# Rather than permit root ssh on the client, it is more secure
# to just allow ssh via a low-privileged user, and use sudo
# in $Conf{RsyncClientPath}.
#
# This setting only matters if
By default, I think that smbclient uses SMB1 on most systems, and it's
definitely disabled by default on Windows. You can force it to use SMB2+,
but I'm not sure what version of smbclient has it enabled.
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019, 6:12 AM Benjamin Toll wrote:
> On 08/29/2019 16:28, Bob McClure Jr
Also Centos 7, just upgraded to 4.3.1 via the hobbes1069 copr repo.
Here's your problem:
>
> Alias /backuppc//usr/share/BackupPC/html/
> Alias /BackupPC//usr/share/BackupPC/html/
> ScriptAlias /BackupPC_Admin /usr/share/BackupPC/sbin/BackupPC_Admin
My
I've found that the version of rsync that Apple bundles is pretty
squirrelly -- there are some posts in the archive about this. But
generally speaking, there were some BackupPC-default rsync arguments that
didn't play nicely with Apple's rsync.
I don't recall having issues with BPCv3, but with
https://backuppc.github.io/backuppc/BackupPC.html#Archive-functions
Although, in the past I've just used BackupPC_tarCreate directly with cron
on the specific hosts/backups.
-Kris
Kris Lou
k...@themusiclink.net
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
,
-Kris
Kris Lou
k...@themusiclink.net
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 4:33 PM, Holger Parplies wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kris Lou via BackupPC-users wrote on 2018-09-27 15:22:20 -0700
> [[BackupPC-users] 4.2.1 Rsync and BackupFilesOnly]:
> > [...]
> > Need More Eyes!
>
> 8
Hey guys,
This is driving me nuts. I just installed a new instance of 4.2.1, and for
whatever reason, I can't get the BackupFilesOnly/BackupFilesExclude to work
correctly. Need More Eyes!
$Conf{BackupFilesOnly} = {
'*' => [
'/SysData'
]
};
$Conf{RsyncShareName} = [
'/sharedfolders'
stance for Bad
> Transfer
>
>
>
> No dice, rsync does not work (nor did rsyncd, failed outright).
>
>
>
> Any further advice? If it helps, the two machines failing are windows 10.
>
>
>
> Jaime
>
>
>
> *From:* Kris Lou via BackupPC-users [mailto:backuppc-us
Then you might be running into some of the file-locking issues inherent to
SMB, especially if you can get a partial backup. Consider trying a
different method, such as VSS-rsync?
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on
Michael is being too modest to link to his own implementation for Windows
clients, so I'll do it for him: http://www.michaelstowe.com/backuppc/
Just a note: This leverages the administrative share (C$) via
smbclient/winexe to kick off rsyncd on the client. As such, the backuppc
server requires
21 matches
Mail list logo
