Hi
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 11:50:46 +0200, Kbtest Testar
wrote:
> We must encrypt according
> to GDPR and the ISO we are follwing, Is this OK or is their any best
> practise we should follow for ecrypting the backed up data?
I wanted to store the backup encrypted, so i used this:
didn't notice this release, but looks good for of-site storage!
If you do implement this, consider sharing how you have done it, so
other (like me) can use it also :)
Thanks
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the
on (zfs)
or a less flexible but more efficient compression (backuppc zlib). Also
notice that you can create several zpools, one with compressions and
other without
good luck
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy
ssible in v3, but V4 already brings that
out of the box for all rsync backups as last backup always have all files
already, next one backup will always only copy what changed.
good luck
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who det
disable the
reverse netbios lookup?
Thanks
Higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or
a fascist dictatorship, or a parlia
> du -csh /backuppc/cpool/?/?/?
I do recommend ncdu, it uses ncurses to show and navigate the disk
so basically it is a improved du that helps a lot finding space
allocation problems
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a coun
Hi
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 23:04:44 -0700, Bill Broadley
wrote:
> root@node1:/backuppc# ls -al cpool/0/0/0 | head -10
> total 384
> drwxr-x--- 2 backuppc backuppc 114688 Mar 28 21:58 .
> drwxr-x--- 18 backuppc backuppc 4096 Aug 24 2011 ..
> -rw-r- 3 backuppc backuppc
tal
backups are much faster. You may need to tune a little the blackout
hours so you do not have many parallel backups on the same machine.
good luck
Higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always
, but then on the copy of the config
we can read the value 2 :)
best regards
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or
e old backup tool where almost all corner cases were taken
care, so it should work.
You can pipe to a ssh host "cd /mnt ;tar xf -" if you want to
transfer the files to other server
Good luck
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
le
would use the ssh and request the same info on the remote
backuppc node.
So does this sound good and simple solution for a flexible
pool management
Thanks
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and
to install a ssh in
windows and use it with backuppc... but you might need to fine tune
the scripts to add the shadow copy scripts to it. Either ways you will
only open one port with a safer service (don't forget to keep it
updated)
good luck
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war
)
Either way, the only required thing is the restore script
and one option for the backup number and/or date of the selected backup.
More elaborated backups and restores require the admin to proper
configure the scripts
Thanks
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war
Hi
But on this topic, my new server seems slow, with only a 3-4 MB/s speed
rating on a GB network (Windows backup over SMB). Is this normal? What
kind of speeds should I be expecting?
smb can be VERY slow with many small files, totally killing
its average speed.
Try
the number of disks and their connection
(sata/esata vs usb or network/iscsi) you may have too much
parallel backups.
Use the vmstat and iostat to monitor your server and check
where you might have a bottleneck.
good luck
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after
want, backup via rsyncd (started only when
the backup is needed via windows rpc calls) and with VSS support
http://www.goodjobsucking.com/?p=62
that gave 2 packages to help the admin to setup things:
http://caravela.homelinux.net/~higuita/backuppc/ (mine)
http://www.michaelstowe.com
Good luck
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or
a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist
and dont see swap usage... it is
still useful!
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or
a fascist dictatorship
, a result from a compression or a backup
Good luck
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or
a fascist dictatorship
not have the c$ share enabled by default (or restricted by the firewall
and network settings).
good luck
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along
Hi all
I've found that vshadow (Using this method) doesn't work under Windows
7/Vista.
Been there... its a pain, but i already have all the shadow
executable for XP, vista and 7, 32bit and 64bit (i ignore XP 64bit,
no one uses it) in this link:
http://caravela.homelinux.net/~higuita
to generate
the support files? are they even required? will this even work at all!?
Does any one tried to pre-fill a backup with existent data that
could give me some tip how to do it?
Thanks in advance!
best regards
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after
)
good luck
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or
a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship
More info about patchs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diff
good luck
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or
a fascist
BIG files, setup then as raw devices with losetup and create the LVM
on top of that... you get a little less performance, as you have to use
yet another layer of software/filesystem and possible a not optimal
network transport protocol for reaching the real HDs... but should work
Good luck
higuita
system you can use the backuppc
deduplication, where in the VM backup it will be useless (the
backuppc deduplication is file bases, for deduplicate VMs you
need block level deduplication)... on the other hand, restores
are plain easy with backup of the VMs
have fun!
higuita
--
Naturally
Hi all
On Sat, 22 May 2010 03:01:40 +0100, Lluis lluis.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Any idea about this. The objective is to achive an almost automatic
configuration for my backup system.
there is no silver bullet, as each setup might be different,
but i use a couple of scripts:
script to
, at least in a functional way... i will
try to fix this bad habit, there is really no reason for me to
keep doing it.
Thanks!
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag
)
For the apache side, you can start it in single thread mode with
the -X option... with it, you can gdb or strace the apache and
requests.
here is a good apache debugging resource:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html
Boa sorte :)
higuita
--
Naturally the common people
last week +%a\\%Y-%m-%d
this outputs today : Qui\2009-09-03
You can do whatever you want with it and always work fine
Gnu date is a must in almost all mine DOS scrips :)
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country
distros already
including support for it for about 3 months
your opinion may vary, of course :)
cya
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along
the only metric, iostat gives the rest
of the info needed.
filesystem choice and
io scheduler do make a difference but faster disks is the only real
cure.
faster HD or more disk to spread the load for more HDs...
for most people, this is true
cya
higuita
--
Naturally
better and dont have inode limit as ext3 have.
cya
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or
a fascist dictatorship
IP, if its have the
file sharing enabled and if isnt running some firewall?
good luck
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether
.
is there any limit to the number of emails one user can receive?
thanks
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy
in the recommended backuppc filesystems) and so
is very fast
you can check with iostat, the number of reads is a lot
less than the writes (unless of course, your clients didnt
changed any file)
cya
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after
a controlled shutdown in case of powerloss
good luck
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or
a fascist dictatorship
probably can confirm it in the client backup
list
cya
higuita
- --
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or
a fascist
... some
keep older virus definitions around and its a waste of
space and IO
good luck
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether
and script after a powerlost and the ZFS
didnt come online no matter what i did... after 2 days of
unsuccessful tries, i installed backuppc.
cya
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always
, all
HDs/OS/filesystems will take a HUGE performance hit
cya
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or
a fascist
or just one file will take almost the same time, even if
there are many files on that dir
cya
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along
also be gained by the normal
rsync-rsyncd...
backuppc rsync cant because doesnt support compression, so
the main question might be how much the data compress
Cya
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who
html quote is useless, the mailling list removes the html
part and even if it didnt, there are still many clients
without html support (usually by choice).
Thanks and sorry about the noise :)
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all
, no need to
direct edit the config.pl
good luck
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or
a fascist dictatorship
), i would say rsyncd is
faster, as doesnt have the ssh overhead... in windows i still
didnt test...
Higuita: How many of these are windows clients and how many
non-windows?
all are MacOSX or Linux, i will try to configure some windows
machines during the next
,cast128-cbc
BatchMode yes
Compression no
i have several HDs for backuppc to sustain this transfers rates.
maybe you are using bad ssh settings if using rsync?
good luck
higuita
--
Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the
leaders of a country who
47 matches
Mail list logo