/2006 06:05 AM
To
backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
cc
Subject
Re: [BackupPC-users] CPU usage and low
network usage
On 3/10/06, Guus Houtzager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Friday 10 March 2006 11:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Here tis..
> >
&g
On 3/10/06, Guus Houtzager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 10 March 2006 11:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Here tis..
> >
> > top - 21:57:44 up 11:45, 2 users, load average: 5.70, 5.50, 4.29
> > Tasks: 106 total, 5 running, 99 sleeping, 0 stopped, 2 zombie
> > Cpu(s): 37.7% us
Lachlan Simpson wrote:
Sorry, obviously that was for my IT team here at work.
You are a backuppc developer aren't you Carl? You certainly know a lot..
no, I'm not a backuppc developer. I just use it, and have a few years of
experience with backups of various sorts. :)
I've learned enough to
On Friday 10 March 2006 11:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here tis..
>
>
> top - 21:57:44 up 11:45, 2 users, load average: 5.70, 5.50, 4.29
> Tasks: 106 total, 5 running, 99 sleeping, 0 stopped, 2 zombie
> Cpu(s): 37.7% us, 25.4% sy, 0.0% ni, 0.4% id, 30.8% wa, 3.3% hi, 2.5%
> si
s] CPU usage and low
network usage
On Thursday 09 March 2006 21:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> When I say 100%, I mean lookin at top or system Monitor in Gnome,
both
> show the processors running at 100% usage, not the number of tasks
running
> on the processor.
Ok. Could you show
On Thursday 09 March 2006 21:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I say 100%, I mean lookin at top or system Monitor in Gnome, both
> show the processors running at 100% usage, not the number of tasks running
> on the processor.
Ok. Could you show us the upper 5 lines from the output of the 'top' c
s] CPU usage and low
network usage
> On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 14:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > it just hovers at about 300kb/s I would expect that when
the file
> > listing is sent, for there to be a heavy load on the network
at that
> > time, and then some heavy cpu work
On 3/9/06, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 14:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > it just hovers at about 300kb/s I would expect that when the file
> > > listing is sent, for there to be a heavy load on the network at that
> > > time, and then some he
elopers.
>
> Cheers
>
> L.
>
>
> --- Forwarded message follows ---
> From: Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] CPU usage
On 03/09 01:43 , David Brown wrote:
> Does --whole-file help, or is it slow even at that?
dunno, never tried that option. :)
--
Carl Soderstrom
Systems Administrator
Real-Time Enterprises
www.real-time.com
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored b
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 03:27:32PM -0600, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 14:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > it just hovers at about 300kb/s I would expect that when the file
> > > listing is sent, for there to be a heavy load on the network at that
> > > time, and t
> On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 14:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > it just hovers at about 300kb/s I would expect that when the file
> > listing is sent, for there to be a heavy load on the network at that
> > time, and then some heavy cpu work, and then more load on the network
> > as it hits files t
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 14:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Les,
> I am not too distressed by the processor usage, as this
> machine is dedicated to baqckuppc, but I am trying to workout why the
> network utilisation is so low. I would expect that if two machines had
> a gigabit connection then
.
Regards,
Jamie Myers
Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/03/2006 03:39 AM
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
backuppc-users
Subject
Re: [BackupPC-users] CPU usage and low
network usage
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 01:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I have a dual core AMD
ge.net
cc
Subject
Re: [BackupPC-users] CPU usage and low
network usage
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 18:23 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> I was hoping to find out if anyone else has seen this situation:
>
> I have a dual core AMD Athlon 64 processor and when backups are
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 01:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a dual core AMD Athlon 64 processor and when backups are taking
> place the processor usage generally sits at 100% on both cores (When
> multiple machines are being backed up), if not at 100% then generally
> very close to it
>
>
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 18:23 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I was hoping to find out if anyone else has seen this situation:
>
> I have a dual core AMD Athlon 64 processor and when backups are taking
> place the processor usage generally sits at 100% on both cores (When
> multiple machines a
ckupPC-users] CPU usage and low
network usage
> I have a dual core AMD Athlon 64 processor and
when backups are taking
> place the processor usage generally sits at 100% on both cores (When
> multiple machines are being backed up), if not at 100% then generally
> very close to
I have a dual core AMD Athlon 64 processor and when backups are taking
place the processor usage generally sits at 100% on both cores (When
multiple machines are being backed up), if not at 100% then generally
very close to it
At the same time, 3 hosts being backed up, two of which have gi
I was hoping to find out if anyone else
has seen this situation:
I have a dual core AMD Athlon 64 processor
and when backups are taking place the processor usage generally sits at
100% on both cores (When multiple machines are being backed up), if not
at 100% then generally very close to it
20 matches
Mail list logo
