Jonathan Dumaresq wrote:
The only think I need to read about, is that LVM. Does anyone here
have a godd link about this ?
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
You probably want to skip the part about compiling the software
yourself and use apt or yum or whatever package manager comes
Thanks for the info
Jonathan
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Nils
Breunese (Lemonbit)
Envoyé : 7 février 2008 06:02
À : backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : Re: [BackupPC-users] Information needed
Jonathan Dumaresq wrote
this ?
Jonathan
_
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de dan
Envoyé : 5 février 2008 20:49
À : Jonathan Dumaresq
Cc : backuppc-users
Objet : Re: [BackupPC-users] Information needed
that dell perc/2 is really an LSI megaraid. each of those channges
is as follow
1 array of 2 hdd
1 array of 6 hdd
1 array of 10 hdd
Jonathan
_
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de dan
Envoyé : 4 février 2008 22:15
À : Justin Best
Cc : backuppc-users
Objet : Re: [BackupPC-users] Information needed
My
: [BackupPC-users] Information needed
My suggestion is:
for OS
2 disks, RAID1 which is a mirror. likely you will have no use for high
performance here, all the work will be done on the other array(s)
for samba. have you considered putting all 16 drives into 1 array, a
RAID6+ hot spare? RAID6
Jonathan Dumaresq wrote:
2 hdd for the os (Mirror RAID-0?)
RAID-0 is not a mirror, RAID-1 is.
Nils Breunese.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
Hi all,
I just put a hand on a funny server,
I have a dell poweredge 6300 with an scsi extension hdd units.
I have this setup with 18 hdd
2 hdd for the os (Mirror RAID-0?)
6 hdd for samba (raid-5 with 1 hot spare)
10 hdd for backuppc
All hdd are 36.4 Gig
On the dell, I have 4 cpu (PIII
Jonathan Dill wrote:
Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
Jonathan Dumaresq wrote:
2 hdd for the os (Mirror RAID-0?)
RAID-0 is not a mirror, RAID-1 is.
I took it to mean that he was referring to RAID 0+1 (two RAID-0
striped
sets that are mirrors of each other). In any case, RAID 1+0
Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
Jonathan Dumaresq wrote:
2 hdd for the os (Mirror RAID-0?)
RAID-0 is not a mirror, RAID-1 is.
I took it to mean that he was referring to RAID 0+1 (two RAID-0 striped
sets that are mirrors of each other). In any case, RAID 1+0 would be
safer
1- What filsystem I should use on the array for backuppc ?
Don't do anything with FAT or other filesystems that don't support
symlinks, BackupPC's pooling mechanism would choke on such a filesystem.
Rumor has it that ReiserFS works a tad better for BackupPC than your
other standard
Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
Jonathan Dumaresq wrote:
2 hdd for the os (Mirror RAID-0?)
RAID-0 is not a mirror, RAID-1 is.
I took it to mean that he was referring to RAID 0+1 (two RAID-0
striped
sets that are mirrors of each other). In any case, RAID 1+0 would be
safer (multiple
Justin Best wrote:
1- What filsystem I should use on the array for backuppc ?
Don't do anything with FAT or other filesystems that don't support
symlinks, BackupPC's pooling mechanism would choke on such a
filesystem.
BackupPC uses *hardlinks* for pooling.
Nils Breunese.
BackupPC uses *hardlinks* for pooling.
DOH! You are so right.
Being mainly a Windows admin, I don't think I ever was completely
clear on the difference between hardlinks and symlinks until a few
minutes ago, when I looked it up. For anyone else who is confused on
hardlinks vs softlinks, I
My suggestion is:
for OS
2 disks, RAID1 which is a mirror. likely you will have no use for high
performance here, all the work will be done on the other array(s)
for samba. have you considered putting all 16 drives into 1 array, a RAID6+
hot spare? RAID6 being a RAID with 2 redundant disks. I
14 matches
Mail list logo
