also sprach Holger Parplies wb...@parplies.de [2011.04.20.2001 +0200]:
We'd all like to be able to choose an existing *pool file* as
reference - this would save us transfers of *any* file already
existing in the pool (e.g. from other hosts). Unfortunately, this
is technically not possible
also sprach Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com [2011.04.27.1507 +0200]:
I think a safer alternative would be to do what the OP proposes
-- that way you always have one safe copy not part of the RAID
in case something messes up
You need that anyway, although starting from scratch it
On 4/28/11 2:37 AM, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com [2011.04.27.1507 +0200]:
I think a safer alternative would be to do what the OP proposes
-- that way you always have one safe copy not part of the RAID
in case something messes up
You need that
This Seems like a case of square peg/round hole. Depending on the size of the
backup set, I would advocate exploring one of the various options that have a
friendly Windows interface, like Dropbox or Crashplan.
Regards,
Josh Harding
-Original Message-
From: Adam Goryachev
Hi,
I've been running BackupPC for a while now and I've been noticing an odd trend,
I have 29 servers which are identical in hardware and very similar in
configuration. 28 of these servers transfer at 30-40MB/s via Rsync, one host
and the database servers transfer between 2-10MB/s, even when
- Original Message -
Hi,
I've been running BackupPC for a while now and I've been noticing an
odd trend, I have 29 servers which are identical in hardware and
very similar in configuration. 28 of these servers transfer at
30-40MB/s via Rsync, one host and the database servers
Gerald,
Not the case with me, if you look at the host ras03, you see that the average
speed is .92MB/s while other host are significantly faster. It is taking 40
hours to do 110GB, while other hosts are doing it in about an hour. I’m about
to patch this box and reboot it, it’s been up for
Hi all
I've found that vshadow (Using this method) doesn't work under Windows
7/Vista.
Been there... its a pain, but i already have all the shadow
executable for XP, vista and 7, 32bit and 64bit (i ignore XP 64bit,
no one uses it) in this link:
Hi,
Michael Conner wrote on 2011-04-27 10:27:18 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users] RAID
and offsite]:
On Apr 26, 2011, at 12:08 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/26/2011 11:38 AM, Michael Conner wrote:
[...]
Someone used a RAID 1 setup but only put in the second disk periodically,
then removed it
Hi,
Les Mikesell wrote on 2011-04-27 20:36:13 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users] RAID and
offsite]:
On 4/27/11 7:10 PM, Chris Parsons wrote:
On 28/04/2011 6:52 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
I've forgotten the original context, but if it is setting up a new
system you don't have much to lose in the
On 4/28/11 9:50 PM, Holger Parplies wrote:
[...]
But, note that even though you don't technically have to stop/unmount
the raid while doing the sync, realistically it doesn't perform well
enough to do backups at the same time. I use a cron job to start the
sync very early in the morning so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/04/11 12:50, Holger Parplies wrote:
I'm sure that's a point where we'll all disagree with each other :-).
No doubt :)
Personally, I wouldn't use a common set of disks for normal backup operation
and offsite backups. BackupPC puts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/04/11 04:08, Dan Lavu wrote:
Gerald,
Not the case with me, if you look at the host ras03, you see that the
average speed is .92MB/s while other host are significantly faster. It
is taking 40 hours to do 110GB, while other hosts are
Hi,
Stephen Gelman wrote on 2011-04-20 22:57:38 -0500 [[BackupPC-users] Can't
Fork Crash on Nexenta (Solaris)]:
On Nexenta (which is essentially an OpenSolaris derivative), I seem to have
issues where BackupPC crashes every once and a while. When it crashes, the
log says:
Can't fork at
14 matches
Mail list logo
