Hi,
Can I run BackupPC 4 on the same machine, and at the same time, as I'm
running BackupPC 4?
I'd like to do some tests, and maintain my old system at the same time,
without buying new hardware.
Gerald
--
The
What is version 4 status?
I want to start an alternative to all other bacups that I already have, so:
1) will it get to a status such as "_hopefully stable_" by the beguining
of the year?
2) what can I expect from current 4 version:
- will it blow up my PC?
- may I loos
On Tuesday 25 October 2016 12:23:50 Jan Novak wrote:
>
> Am 25.10.2016 um 11:58 schrieb Markus Koeberl:
> >> yes, also another topic: I use zfs. Will backuppc handle snapshots in
> >> the future?
> > There was this posting on the ZFSonLinux list which might be interesting
> > for you:
> >
On 25.10.16 13:23, Jan Novak wrote:
>
>
> Am 25.10.2016 um 11:58 schrieb Markus Koeberl:
>>> yes, also another topic: I use zfs. Will backuppc handle snapshots in
>>> the future?
>> There was this posting on the ZFSonLinux list which might be interesting for
>> you:
>>
Am 25.10.2016 um 11:58 schrieb Markus Koeberl:
>> yes, also another topic: I use zfs. Will backuppc handle snapshots in
>> the future?
> There was this posting on the ZFSonLinux list which might be interesting for
> you:
> http://list.zfsonlinux.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2014-March/014859.html
On Monday 24 October 2016 16:52:00 Jan Novak wrote:
> yes, also another topic: I use zfs. Will backuppc handle snapshots in
> the future?
There was this posting on the ZFSonLinux list which might be interesting for
you:
http://list.zfsonlinux.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2014-March/014859.html
It
On 10/25/2016 12:50 PM, Jan Novak wrote:
> Am 24.10.2016 um 16:59 schrieb Johan Ehnberg:
>> yes, also another topic: I use zfs. Will backuppc handle snapshots in
>>> the future?
>> If someone implements it, sure. However, many features of ZFS are
>> already handled in BackupPC, so that is perhaps
Am 24.10.2016 um 16:59 schrieb Johan Ehnberg:
> yes, also another topic: I use zfs. Will backuppc handle snapshots in
>> the future?
> If someone implements it, sure. However, many features of ZFS are
> already handled in BackupPC, so that is perhaps redundant work. My
> suggestion would be to