On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 10:17:41 -0700
Craig Barratt via BackupPC-users
wrote:
> Sorry that it isn't very clearly stated
Nooo, there's no more sorry in stock… may be a little forgive,
for the lowest rate of $.91 (sub-primed credit allowed) ;-p)
> and it doesn't depend on the real client's inode
Sorry that it isn't very clearly stated - yes, v4 does store inode-like
information in the backup tree (and can therefore accurately represent
hardlinks etc), but it uses regular files to do it - it doesn't use real
hardlinks, and it doesn't depend on the real client's inode (and inode
numbers) on
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 08:50:30 -0600
Ray Frush wrote:
> Jean-Yves-
Ray
> I believe you may have been looking at v3 documentation. BackupPC V4
> does _not_ make extensive use of hard links.
>
> See: https://backuppc.github.io/backuppc/BackupPC.html#BackupPC-4.0
Na, I'm on: http://backuppc.sour
Jean-Yves-
I believe you may have been looking at v3 documentation. BackupPC V4
does _not_ make extensive use of hard links.
See: https://backuppc.github.io/backuppc/BackupPC.html#BackupPC-4.0
--
Ray Frush
Colorado State University.
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 6:10 PM, B wrote:
> Hi backup
