Re: [BackupPC-users] smbclient gets NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED

2019-08-30 Thread Kris Lou via BackupPC-users
By default, I think that smbclient uses SMB1 on most systems, and it's
definitely disabled by default on Windows.  You can force it to use SMB2+,
but I'm not sure what version of smbclient has it enabled.

On Sat, Aug 31, 2019, 6:12 AM Benjamin Toll  wrote:

> On 08/29/2019 16:28, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
> > Hmm.  My smbclient comes from samba-client-3.6.23-52.el6_10.x86_64.
> > Does that correlate?
> >
> > If so, I guess I get dragged kicking and screaming to CentOS 7.  Have
> > to in a year anyway.
>
>
>  Samba wiki says they added support for SMB3 with version 4.0.0. I don't
> have any CentOS boxes, but it looks like CentOS 7 has Samba 4.8.3
>
> The notes I made back when I updated our BackupPC servers to support
> Windows 10 tell me that I had trouble with Samba 4.8.0+, so I'm using
> Samba 4.6.16. I don't remember what kind of trouble I was having though.
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> BackupPC-users mailing list
> BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
> Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
>
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] smbclient gets NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED

2019-08-30 Thread Benjamin Toll
On 08/29/2019 16:28, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
> Hmm.  My smbclient comes from samba-client-3.6.23-52.el6_10.x86_64.
> Does that correlate?
>
> If so, I guess I get dragged kicking and screaming to CentOS 7.  Have
> to in a year anyway.


 Samba wiki says they added support for SMB3 with version 4.0.0. I don't
have any CentOS boxes, but it looks like CentOS 7 has Samba 4.8.3

The notes I made back when I updated our BackupPC servers to support
Windows 10 tell me that I had trouble with Samba 4.8.0+, so I'm using
Samba 4.6.16. I don't remember what kind of trouble I was having though.





___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


[BackupPC-users] Updating v4.21 to v4.31

2019-08-30 Thread Timmy Siu via BackupPC-users
Dear all Users,

I have a running copy of BackupPC v4.21 on my Oracle Linux 7.?? It is
running well even though I don't need it to backup anything.

Now, my question is: how do I update my BackupPC to v4.31 from the tar
ball file?

Thanks for any opinion.


Timmy



___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/


Re: [BackupPC-users] smbclient gets NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED

2019-08-30 Thread Michael Stowe

On 2019-08-29 19:55, Bob McClure Jr wrote:

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:48:45PM +, Michael Stowe wrote:

On 2019-08-29 14:47, Michael Stowe wrote:

> On 2019-08-29 13:02, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
>
>> I'm at wit's end -- a short trip. I have a very simple setup of a Linux server (CentOS 6) 
running BackupPC to back up a Win 10 Pro machine. BackupPC is BackupPC-3.3.1-5.el6.x86_64 from the EPEL 
repo. On the Win 10 box, I created a normal user "backuppc" with a password, and then put him 
in the local "Backup Operators" group. I'm using SMB for the backup method.
>>
>> # smbclient '//nate/C$' -U backuppc -c pwd Enter backuppc's password: 
Domain=[NATE] OS=[Windows 10 Pro 18362] Server=[Windows 10 Pro 6.3] tree connect 
failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
>>
>> And of course, the backups fail. I've done a Web search from the Win 10 
aspect, the samba aspect, and the BackupPC aspect, and have come up dry.
>>
>> Here is the hosts file:
>>
>> host dhcp user moreUsers nate 0 bob
>
> You can debug this entirely at the command line; you're likely to find "-d 
debuglevel" helpful as it can help you pinpoint exactly what's going wrong.
>
> As another response alluded to, this is often due to smbclient not supporting 
recent enough protocol versions; ratcheting up the debug level should allow you to 
see the negotiation. If this is indeed the case, this can be mitigated by 
upgrading smbclient (preferred) or allowing Win10 to fall back to older versions.

I'd still recommend that as a debugging method, but one other 
potential

cause is that Win10 now disables remote access to the administrative
shares by default.  They can be specifically re-enabled, but without
doing so, would generate an access denied error no matter what
credentials were used.


I tried the debug level at 3 (the highest recommended for mere
mortals) and found nothing educational.

I rebooted my workstation to CentOS 7 and tried smbclient and it, too,
failed, so I guess it's the remote access problem.  Does that mean
rsync won't do any better than smb or does rsync get past the remote
restrictions?

Any clues on how to enable remote access?  I'm not concerned about
security since we're behind a good firewall.

Cheers,


This is how to enable remote shares:
https://u2182357.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=rBK8reUlX8Sxr7Iz1fV-2F7fB0NECgtVa3tQh4O52BIRkc9-2FxI35iS9RIffWOpxMiHDlA6Rik7ZqM5ULeaWsMfPcBwDahMJxrjwfA-2Bq1J0hWE-3D_OypFYCWzG5ApGW-2FFpGTxc4RCS9eud0Dl1htN5rYoUZ8To4zeNUFBkAGI3hzer91CG4cTrGD7J6lbr2S8rKruFJaFr3HD6Acrq1e6JDqWs-2FonTyT-2FvpG6YsaxO0wo23nI447AMCTK6PKUWErD5zqkMRMsxa8Ddmwq8fsQ-2FvPNPOCEsHs91K0AtI7-2F5WSzLZQTq8MtcMjojhu-2F1yJMraKlBa7tG7PrVsU4scW1-2Fpdy0lM-3D

This is how to enable older versions of the smb protocol:
https://u2182357.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=rBK8reUlX8Sxr7Iz1fV-2F7Qgbyc8hNp-2BwXA9Wwf3uSMz-2Ff-2FFndnY61cbQ417VQmoH-2B0F2LWOyHDRpeiOS8m292oOfPzsb7Fbw-2BpFvCQ4SMmEqFawMqNFqVrHVPS2yX10mpJmRVkJybwWX3dKfBOsk-2F0Rpp6D736v4IoJiA6yBb1p9HsUWLqx4w-2BSM0-2BPMezbtgEewkV997QtEiwhrNT6Vxw-3D-3D_OypFYCWzG5ApGW-2FFpGTxc4RCS9eud0Dl1htN5rYoUZ8To4zeNUFBkAGI3hzer91CG4cTrGD7J6lbr2S8rKruFEIXTbsXfWZtSB0lat-2FM56v2zfxbuFYPR-2BhlM0MH36fnZPUnFTGBGGlFHyw6-2FQjUfS5XMT-2FrAJDDXA4Tcz63xPF1i7gPRaiWybANdab5VDe-2BZaFo-2FUr7NqRmjBN6xZ7J-2B4iPExEafxfpUjDBwMuLm7c-3D

Though to answer your question rsync doesn't rely (or is aware of in any 
way) the default shares, and it doesn't use the smb protocol, so you 
wouldn't have these problems.  You may have a different set of problems, 
mainly revolving around getting permissions and modules right, and (if 
you use it) properly engaging shadowing.  That said, SMB can't use 
shadowing at all, so I see rsync as a major improvement in many ways and 
use it for all my windows systems.
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/