Craig Barratt wrote:
Rich writes:
I don't think BackupPC will update the pool with the smaller file even
though it knows the source was identical, and some tests I just did
backing up /tmp seem to agree. Once compressed and copied into the
pool, the file is not updated with future
John Pettitt wrote:
What happens is the newly transfered file is compared against candidates
in the pool with the same hash value and if one exists it's just
linked, The new file is not compressed. It seems to me that if you
want to change the compression in the pool the way to go
Rich Rauenzahn wrote:
I know backuppc will sometimes need to re-transfer a file (for instance,
if it is a 2nd copy in another location.) I assume it then
re-compresses it on the re-transfer, as my understanding is the
compression happens as the file is written to disk.(?)
Would it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to have an information about compression level.
I'm still doing several tests about compression and I would like to
have your opinion about something :
I think that there is a very little difference between level 1 and
level 9.
I tought that
Rich writes:
I don't think BackupPC will update the pool with the smaller file even
though it knows the source was identical, and some tests I just did
backing up /tmp seem to agree. Once compressed and copied into the
pool, the file is not updated with future higher compressed copies.
Does
PROTECTED]
05/12/2007 08:00
A
Rich Rauenzahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Romain PICHARD/Mondeville/VIC/[EMAIL PROTECTED],
backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet
Re: [BackupPC-users] Compression level
Rich writes:
I don't think BackupPC will update the pool
