On 21 Apr 2020, at 12:09, Pim Rupert wrote:
>
> I am just speculating here, but could it be that when the BackupPC software
> is handling the SSH process, it is somehow unable to deal with the implictly
> added ProxyCommand arguments?
Following this hunch I tried starting the B
unable to deal with the implictly added
ProxyCommand arguments?
Also, not trying to be cheeky here: for added security you don't actually need
AgentForwarding nor root logins when using a jump host.
Best regards,
Pim Rupert
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
list will be able to
shine a light on how I can get this working.
Best regards,
Pim Rupert
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:
like sshportal or ssh-bastion?
All hosts use normal sshd from CentOS 7.
Best regards,
Pim Rupert
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
Xfer PIDs are now 1143,1147
xferPids 1143,1147
xferPids 1143,1147
__bpc_progress_fileCnt__ 1
__bpc_progress_fileCnt__ 21
(...)
Best regards,
Pim Rupert
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List:
Hi Falko,
>> Apparently a shell is required to use a jump host from the ssh command in
>> this situation?
>
> There's an analysis about apparently same problem:
>
> https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/457692/does-ssh-proxyjump-require-local-shell-access
>
> They mention, that setting the
Hello Tshepo,
The full size in the web interface shows the size of the last FULL backup.
The data may be relatively new and not yet part of the last full backup. Could
you check that?
Best regards,
Pim Rupert
> On 31 Aug 2020, at 15:38, Tshepo Msimango via BackupPC-users
>
Hi Craig,
> On 9 Nov 2020, at 18:00, Craig Barratt via BackupPC-users
> wrote:
>
> Yes, it's perfectly fine to downgrade to rsync-bpc-3.1.2.0-2.el7. It's fully
> compatible with BackupPC 4.4.0. It would be good to know whether it behaves
> differently.
>
> What are your settings for
.
Best regards,
Pim Rupert
> On 9 Nov 2020, at 18:00, Craig Barratt via BackupPC-users
> wrote:
>
> Yes, it's perfectly fine to downgrade to rsync-bpc-3.1.2.0-2.el7. It's fully
> compatible with BackupPC 4.4.0. It would be good to know whether it behaves
> differently.
no pattern, it seems to happen randomly, on random hosts.
1. Any pointers for further debugging?
2. Can we safely downgrade to rsync-bpc-3.1.2.0-2.el7 while keeping
BackupPC-4.4.0-1.el7.x86_64?
Best regards,
Pim Rupert
___
BackupPC-users mailing
tate, 1 Scott Street, Waverley, Johannesburg
> www.vox.co.za
>
> <4.png>
>
> <2.png>
>
> <1.png>
>
> <3.png>
>
> <0.png>
>
>
> From: Pim Rupert
> Sent: 31 August 2020 16:02
> To: General
What is the output and exit code when running "/bin/ping6 -c 1
myHostname.example" from the shell of backuppc@backuphost?
Regards,
Pim
> On 17 Feb 2023, at 13:55, Willy Manga wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can someone confirm at least that backuppc works fine on an IPv6-only
> instance please?
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo