On 2014-04-10 09:41 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 04/10/14 09:27, jon pounder wrote:
>> On 04/10/2014 09:21 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
>>> On 2014-04-09 03:58 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>>
I need your help to succeed. If I am the only one removing this
unpleasant material from the Bacula
Hello,
In retrospect, given some of the comments I received, and a lot of
time wasted by everyone, it was probably a bad idea to ask for
help. As a response to one criticism, I would say that I never
asked anyone to "blindly erase" information from the Bac
Hello Jon,
Out of belief that what you sow is what you reap, I make a very big
effort not to wish bad things on others regardless what they do to me,
but I wish you would switch camps and use the Bareos software. I think
you will be happier there.
Good luck,
Kern
On 04/10/2014 03:45 PM, jon pou
On 04/10/2014 03:41 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 04/10/14 09:27, jon pounder wrote:
>> On 04/10/2014 09:21 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
>>> On 2014-04-09 03:58 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>>
I need your help to succeed. If I am the only one removing this
unpleasant material from the Bacula p
On 04/10/2014 03:21 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 2014-04-09 03:58 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
>> I need your help to succeed. If I am the only one removing this
>> unpleasant material from the Bacula page, they will ultimately bar me,
>> and we will be forced to have Bareos propaganda defacing what
Jon,
The statement they wrote, has a number of very incorrect points,
rather than argue it out here, I will just mention one (Bareos was
started by ONE former contributor). Technically they are a one
man show.
There are many other points that when yo
On 4/10/2014 10:02 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 04/10/14 09:45, jon pounder wrote:
>> On 04/10/2014 09:39 AM, Jason A. Kates wrote:
>>> As they are worded more like slander than indisputable facts. They
>>> could be worded in a neutral manner, as they are listed it's far from
>>> neutral or s
On 04/10/2014 10:02 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 04/10/14 09:45, jon pounder wrote:
>> On 04/10/2014 09:39 AM, Jason A. Kates wrote:
>>> As they are worded more like slander than indisputable facts. They
>>> could be worded in a neutral manner, as they are listed it's far from
>>> neutral or s
On 04/10/14 09:45, jon pounder wrote:
> On 04/10/2014 09:39 AM, Jason A. Kates wrote:
>> As they are worded more like slander than indisputable facts. They
>> could be worded in a neutral manner, as they are listed it's far from
>> neutral or strait facts.
>>
>> Equating this to a holocaust denie
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 09:27 -0400, jon pounder wrote:
> On 04/10/2014 09:21 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 2014-04-09 03:58 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >
> >> I need your help to succeed. If I am the only one removing this
> >> unpleasant material from the Bacula page, they will ultimately bar me,
On 04/10/2014 09:39 AM, Jason A. Kates wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 09:27 -0400, jon pounder wrote:
>> On 04/10/2014 09:21 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
>>> On 2014-04-09 03:58 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>>
I need your help to succeed. If I am the only one removing this
unpleasant material f
On 04/10/14 09:27, jon pounder wrote:
> On 04/10/2014 09:21 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
>> On 2014-04-09 03:58 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>
>>> I need your help to succeed. If I am the only one removing this
>>> unpleasant material from the Bacula page, they will ultimately bar me,
>>> and we will be f
On 04/10/2014 09:21 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 2014-04-09 03:58 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
>> I need your help to succeed. If I am the only one removing this
>> unpleasant material from the Bacula page, they will ultimately bar me,
>> and we will be forced to have Bareos propaganda defacing what
On 2014-04-09 03:58 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I need your help to succeed. If I am the only one removing this
> unpleasant material from the Bacula page, they will ultimately bar me,
> and we will be forced to have Bareos propaganda defacing what the
> Bacula users and myself have created over th
On 04/09/2014 03:58 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Until the lawsuit is settled, what they have said is only their opinion
on the matter (as its clearly stated in the snippet) as you are also
entitled to yours. I don't think you have any legal rights to remove
that, and shouldn't be asking the bacula
Hello Bacula Users,
I need your help. Bareos, mostly through Maik Aussendorf, is
carrying a negative publicity campaign on the Bacula wikipedia site:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacula
The problem is every time I remove their propaganda, which is the
16 matches
Mail list logo
