On Sunday 28 June 2009 02:53:18 James Harper wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 June 2009 13:00:57 James Harper wrote:
> > > > We only test the FD, so the DIR and SD could have been broken for
>
> some
>
> > > time.
> > >
> > >
> > > Even the FD won't start up, so either something is presently broken
>
> in
> On Saturday 27 June 2009 13:00:57 James Harper wrote:
> > > We only test the FD, so the DIR and SD could have been broken for
some
> >
> > time.
> >
> >
> > Even the FD won't start up, so either something is presently broken
in
> > the current svn or something is broken in my build.
> >
> > Is th
>
> On Saturday 27 June 2009 13:00:57 James Harper wrote:
> > > We only test the FD, so the DIR and SD could have been broken for
some
> >
> > time.
> >
> >
> > Even the FD won't start up, so either something is presently broken
in
> > the current svn or something is broken in my build.
> >
> > Is
On Saturday 27 June 2009 13:00:57 James Harper wrote:
> > We only test the FD, so the DIR and SD could have been broken for some
>
> time.
>
>
> Even the FD won't start up, so either something is presently broken in
> the current svn or something is broken in my build.
>
> Is the current svn known
On Saturday 27 June 2009 12:21:04 James Harper wrote:
> > > I get a crash as soon as I try and run the director or sd... I'm
> > > guessing the current svn isn't quite ready for windows then?
> >
> > We only test the FD, so the DIR and SD could have been broken for some
>
> time.
>
> It worked at 3
On Saturday 27 June 2009 13:00:57 James Harper wrote:
> > We only test the FD, so the DIR and SD could have been broken for some
>
> time.
>
>
> Even the FD won't start up, so either something is presently broken in
> the current svn or something is broken in my build.
>
> Is the current svn known
>
> We only test the FD, so the DIR and SD could have been broken for some
time.
>
Even the FD won't start up, so either something is presently broken in
the current svn or something is broken in my build.
Is the current svn known to be good for win32 bacula-fd.exe?
Thanks
James
> >
> > I get a crash as soon as I try and run the director or sd... I'm
> > guessing the current svn isn't quite ready for windows then?
> >
>
> We only test the FD, so the DIR and SD could have been broken for some
time.
It worked at 3.0.1. Anything spring to mind as a place to start looking?
On Friday 26 June 2009 16:15:49 James Harper wrote:
> > The patch following this email adds the necessary symbols to the win32
>
> def
>
> > file to get it building again (line wrapping will probably kill it,
>
> but I can
>
> > commit it directly if you want).
> >
> > I assume the 64 bit build wil
On Friday 26 June 2009 15:42:03 James Harper wrote:
> The patch following this email adds the necessary symbols to the win32
> def file to get it building again (line wrapping will probably kill it,
> but I can commit it directly if you want).
Yes, please commit it.
>
> I assume the 64 bit build
The patch following this email adds the necessary symbols to the win32
def file to get it building again (line wrapping will probably kill it,
but I can commit it directly if you want).
I assume the 64 bit build will need the same sort of massaging...
I haven't yet tested the resulting binary, bu
>
> The patch following this email adds the necessary symbols to the win32
def
> file to get it building again (line wrapping will probably kill it,
but I can
> commit it directly if you want).
>
> I assume the 64 bit build will need the same sort of massaging...
>
> I haven't yet tested the res
12 matches
Mail list logo
