Re: [Bacula-devel] bconsole unresponsive for long periods

2010-04-23 Thread Graham Keeling
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:47:34PM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote: Hello Graham, Le jeudi 22 avril 2010 17:47:35, Graham Keeling a écrit : Hello, I am not sure whether this is a bug or a feature request. I will happily fill in the form for either, once somebody advises... The

Re: [Bacula-devel] bconsole unresponsive for long periods

2010-04-23 Thread Graham Keeling
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:09:48AM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: On 22/04/2010 11:47 PM, Graham Keeling wrote: Hello, I am not sure whether this is a bug or a feature request. I will happily fill in the form for either, once somebody advises... The command that I run most often on

Re: [Bacula-devel] bconsole unresponsive for long periods

2010-04-23 Thread Eric Bollengier
Hello, Le vendredi 23 avril 2010 10:00:39, Graham Keeling a écrit : On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 06:47:34PM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote: Hello Graham, Le jeudi 22 avril 2010 17:47:35, Graham Keeling a écrit : Hello, I am not sure whether this is a bug or a feature request. I will

Re: [Bacula-devel] bconsole unresponsive for long periods

2010-04-23 Thread Graham Keeling
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:31:49AM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote: For normal Accurate backup, it uses dedicated connection since the beginning, so it's shouldn't block commands too. I do not think this works because for me, the 'status director' command blocks until the accurate query is

Re: [Bacula-devel] bconsole unresponsive for long periods

2010-04-23 Thread Eric Bollengier
Le vendredi 23 avril 2010 10:52:49, Graham Keeling a écrit : On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:31:49AM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote: For normal Accurate backup, it uses dedicated connection since the beginning, so it's shouldn't block commands too. I do not think this works because for me, the

Re: [Bacula-devel] bconsole unresponsive for long periods

2010-04-23 Thread Craig Ringer
On 23/04/10 16:52, Graham Keeling wrote: On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:31:49AM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote: For normal Accurate backup, it uses dedicated connection since the beginning, so it's shouldn't block commands too. I do not think this works because for me, the 'status director' command

Re: [Bacula-devel] bconsole unresponsive for long periods

2010-04-23 Thread Graham Keeling
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:52:41AM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote: Le vendredi 23 avril 2010 10:52:49, Graham Keeling a écrit : On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:31:49AM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote: For normal Accurate backup, it uses dedicated connection since the beginning, so it's shouldn't

[Bacula-devel] bconsole ignores control-C

2010-04-23 Thread morty
bconsole 5.0.1, even in -n mode, ignores control-C (SIGINT). This is annoying. Is there a way to fix? - Morty -- ___ Bacula-devel mailing list

Re: [Bacula-devel] bconsole unresponsive for long periods

2010-04-23 Thread Stephen Thompson
Hello, As I mentioned, I am having the same problem the original poster mentioned even though he later recanted. I run all my jobs using the Accurate mode and on particularly large (possibly number of files rather than size) jobs, the Status of the Director will block bconsole until the

Re: [Bacula-devel] bconsole unresponsive for long periods

2010-04-23 Thread Eric Bollengier
Hello, At this point, a mysqladmin processlist is much more useful than a backtrace. Anyway, it doesn't look like to be a Bacula problem, but a MySQL MyISAM limitation. It's a bit hard to read the backtrace to analyse database contention, but it looks like the Accurate query uses the Job table

Re: [Bacula-devel] bconsole unresponsive for long periods

2010-04-23 Thread Stephen Thompson
Thanks for the response! Yes, in fact, we are almost always submitting multiple jobs one right after the other, so it's likely that the jobs submitted first are locking a table for writes and that's causing the problem. Though this problem I am seeing did not happen with 3.0.3. And I've