Yes
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] When I do a ./bconsole and then status. I choose 4 and it says that all the daemons are running. That is odd because to generate the status it connects using the password. Are you using just one machine at the
trust me, I've done all of that.
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Didn't edit a thing except made sure all the passwords matched.The reason I asked that is any change at all in any of the .conf files with bacula running requires either bacula to be
I'm using one machine and all my files are in the /etc/bacula. I'm running 1.38.5. on linux fedora Core.
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] trust me, I've done all of that.I have a few questions. What version of bacula are you running? What os /
All, a couple of things:
There doesn't seem to be an official definition of GFS, but the most
popular explanation to be found involves Full/0 backups on Friday and
incremental/differentials on Monday through Thursday. That's great for
9-5 office environments, but what about data centers?
It's
Here is the output from ps -A
13133 ? 00:00:00 bacula-fd13141 ? 00:00:00 bacula-dir10423 pts/1 00:11:54 ruby31504 ? 00:00:00 drbd0_worker31509 ? 00:00:00 drbd1_worker31516 ? 00:00:00 drbd2_worker31580 ? 00:00:00 drbd3_worker31686 ? 00:00:00 drbd4_worker31771 ? 00:00:00 drbd5_worker31781 ?
Didn't edit a thing except made sure all the passwords matched.
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I see all daemons are started. Could you post your bacula-sd.conf? And did you edit any of the .conf files after you started the daemons? John
When I do a ./bconsole and then status. I choose 4 and it says that all the daemons are running.
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are you certain that the storage daemon is actually running? 'ps -A'look for a line with 'bacula-sd'.Agreed, If you
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:56:22PM +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote:
This option is not implemented in Win32 systems.
Or, in other words, you can't do that with windows.
Ouch! I'm sorry for not having read the fine manual far enough to
have spotted that, but it never occurred to me that the
Hi,
this week i updated to 1.38.5 (Debian 3.1) and overhauled my config. Now
i have an Autochanger resource and some device resources.
20 jobs are running simultaneously, but all on the first
device /dev/nst0.
Do you have any ideas how to force Bacula to use all available drives?
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 03:40:10PM +0100, Christoph Brunner wrote:
Hi,
this week i updated to 1.38.5 (Debian 3.1) and overhauled my config. Now
i have an Autochanger resource and some device resources.
20 jobs are running simultaneously, but all on the first
device /dev/nst0.
Do you
Hi all
Is there an easy way to see the list of files/dirs that would be backed
up (or excluded) by a fileset and its associated include/exclude
options? (Specifically when it comes to wild/regex sets)
Steve
---
This SF.net email is
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:21:48PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
As the author of the Bacula PostgreSQL module, I'm curious as to why
you would go in that direction. Most people tend to move to
PostgreSQL from MySQL.
Is there something missing you need?
I'm also considering switching from
Hi,
You should look to this option :
*Prefer Mounted Volumes = yes|no*
If the Prefer Mounted Volumes directive is set to *yes* (default
yes), the Storage daemon is requested to select either an
Autochanger or a drive with a valid Volume already mounted in
preference to a drive
On 3 Feb 2006 at 7:10, Karl Hakimian wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:21:48PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
As the author of the Bacula PostgreSQL module, I'm curious as to why
you would go in that direction. Most people tend to move to
PostgreSQL from MySQL.
Is there something
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:42:44 -0500
Frank Sweetser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 03:40:10PM +0100, Christoph Brunner wrote:
Hi,
this week i updated to 1.38.5 (Debian 3.1) and overhauled my
config. Now i have an Autochanger resource and some device
resources.
20
Hi all,
I'm running out of space for my hard disk backups and I need to add
another hard drive. I'm not adding more clients at this time, but
I need more space.
My question is the following:
Can I add the hard drive, move some of my client volumes from the old
drive to the new drive, add a new
Why not add a large enough hd, move ALL the data to it and then softlink the entire directory to the new drive.On 2/3/06, Eric Peterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Thanks, Graham. Unfortunately, everything is under one directory.
On 2/3/06, Purcocks, Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If your
Thanks, Graham. Unfortunately, everything is under one directory. On 2/3/06, Purcocks, Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If your directory structure allows it, you could just soft
link half your directories across to the new disk, move the data and change
nothing.
If all your files are under
Every time I do a run and select client1 I get the following error
messages:
I just made the following on my (tester) FC4, just to test this your
problem.
Pls. try to follow this, with the same versions, to make sure you haven't
found some broken package, or built something wrong if you have
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Why not add a large enough hd, move ALL the data to it and then softlink the
entire directory to the new drive.
Why not using LVM so this problem just does not happen at all?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, David Muench wrote:
On 2/3/06, Christoph Brunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, now Bacula tries to use more than one drive. Unfortunately it tries
to load the same volume into several drives ...
I suspect to do some locking with volumes, right?!
In the examples i found
On 2/3/06, Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not using LVM so this problem just does not happen at all?
This is currently part of my plan. I plan to buy another hard drive and
set it up with LVM. I will then copy everything from the old
drive to the new LVM drive. I will then mount the
On 2/3/06, Christoph Brunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, now Bacula tries to use more than one drive. Unfortunately it tries
to load the same volume into several drives ...
I suspect to do some locking with volumes, right?!
In the examples i found only some library locking.
How do you
That sounds like a good plan.
All you have to do is impliment it
:)
From: Eric Peterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 February 2006 16:50To: Wolfgang
DenkCc: Joe Smokie (RJB); Purcocks, Graham;
bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: Re: [Bacula-users] running
out of space
I'll try tuning things if you can get the data to me, or give me
access to the database. It's not always indexes. Sometimes it's
more along the lines of queries or vacuum.
While setting up access to my data, I copied my bacula database to a new
database and had quite an unexpected result.
I'll try tuning things if you can get the data to me, or give me
access to the database. It's not always indexes.
Sometimes it's more
along the lines of queries or vacuum.
While setting up access to my data, I copied my bacula
database to a new database and had quite an unexpected
Hi,
Has anyone used Bacula on novell 6.5 SP5 which gives us OES (Open
Enterprise Server)? I want to backup my novell server to a linux box
runnign suse 9.3 pro. Thank you for any help.
Michael
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
Hi All-
I'm looking to upgrade to a new tape library,
and am looking at the Overland Neo 2000 with Ultrium 3 drives.
I saw on the bacula web page that it's listed as 'supported', but with
LTO-1 drives.
Is anyone out there using Bacula with an
Overland Neo 2000? And possibly with LTO-Ultrium 3
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 20:22:34 +0100, Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
I'll try tuning things if you can get the data to me, or give me
access to the database. It's not always indexes.
Sometimes it's more
along the lines of queries or vacuum.
While setting up access
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:51:45 -0800, Ryan Sizemore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
In the process of testing bacula, I am attempting to restore the catalog
using bscan. According to the documentation,
It should be noted that *bscan* cannot restore a database to the exact
condition it was in
This sounds like either table or index bloat. Typical
reasons for tihs
are not doing vacuum (which obviously isn't your problem),
or having
too few FSM pages. This can also be caused by not running vacuum
earlier, but doing it now - if you got far enough away from
the good
path
Does bacula have a way of keeping track how many times it writes to a
tape completely so that it can declare a tape old and needs to be
replaced after so many complete writes?
--
Alex Dioso
Systems Administrator, VLSI Lab
Dept. of Electrical Engineering
Building EE1 Room 206
University
Hi,
I'm running Bacula 1.38.5 on a Sun E420R, Solaris 9, attached to a Sun
StorEdge L25 autochanger with two Quantum SDLT-320 drives. I'm seeing
that when the bacula-sd daemon is running, I cannot issue any mt
commands from the command line. For example:
# mt -f /dev/rmt/0cbn status
33 matches
Mail list logo
