On Saturday 15 April 2006 14:40, Diederik de Vries wrote:
Hi there!
I'm currently testdriving Bacula 1.38.7. Three machines are backupping
eachother:
il1 (Windows) - il2
il2 (Linux) - il3
il3 (Linux) - il2
This setup works. Today, I've tried to restore the il3 machine to
On Friday 14 April 2006 22:04, Bennett, Silas (GE Indust, Security) wrote:
Hi Kern,
I did not intend for my emails to be read as complaints.
I don't really mind complains, and in fact, my response was a complaint :-)
Bacula works
_Very_ well for me, and I am very grateful for the work
Kern and list,
Needless to say: this was my own mistake.
I adjusted the FileSet, and got an email: Bacula: Restore OK of il3-fd
Full :)
Thanks, and have a GREAT easter!
Diederik
Rotterdam, NL
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a
Recently the place I work for hired a consultant to help us setup Bacula. He
has been most helpfull and we have a basic setup working, but I wanted to
start learning it since long term I will have to manage it. Pending boss
approval I may still go and pester him some more in the near future.
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 12:09:18PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
So far I have not found the following on the docs:
I'm far from the expert that several other list members are, but I'll
take a shot at these.
* Difference between Full, Differential, Incremental in Bacula.
I know the concepts,
Reading Bacula's current state I see under heading:
Current Implementation Restrictions
+ Data encryption of the Volume contents.
What does that mean? Encryption of volumens are not supported yet?
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francisco Reyes wrote:
Reading Bacula's current state I see under heading:
Current Implementation Restrictions
+ Data encryption of the Volume contents.
What does that mean? Encryption of volumens are not supported yet?
Correct: There's
Michel Meyers wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francisco Reyes wrote:
Reading Bacula's current state I see under heading:
Current Implementation Restrictions
+ Data encryption of the Volume contents.
What does that mean? Encryption of volumens are not supported yet?
On 15 Apr 2006 at 12:36, RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN wrote:
On 13 Apr 2006 at 15:52, RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN wrote:
Hello all i have a fresh install of bacula using mysql
database
on
fedora core 3. I have the following error message
paroused
though
Bill Moran wrote:
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006 21:22:26 -0500
Erich Prinz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me know if you want the pre compiled FD.
Would you mind putting this up on ftp or something for me to grab.
So far I've been unable to build from source or Darwin Ports.
Thanks.
What version
Couldn't you handle both cases transparently. If the pattern has a / in
it then pass the full name, otherwise just pass the basename to fnmatch().
That way you get both behaviours without breaking existing examples and
configs.
Ironically the Windows example FileSet in the manual expects the
Michel Meyers writes:
Correct: There's encryption of the communication between the File Daemon
and the Storage Daemon but no encryption of the data as it is written to
tape/HDD/CD/DVD. That's still on the todo list.
Ok. Thanks for explanation. Perhaps the doc could be updated to read
Dominic Marks writes:
Bacula volumes on a encrypted device using the built in capabilities of
GEOM.
For the setup at work this is not much of an option. Specially that there
will be jobs running throughout the night. The encrypted partition will be
up at all times most likely so if the
John Kodis writes:
I'd guess that either you've changed something in your filesystem --
touched most of the files, or changed where a large filesystem is
mounted -- or that Bacula overrode your request.
Can't really imagine any of the above.
Anyone could confirm that this sequence works for
Estimates are full. It's in the manual, IIRC.
Francisco Reyes wrote:
John Kodis writes:
I'd guess that either you've changed something in your filesystem --
touched most of the files, or changed where a large filesystem is
mounted -- or that Bacula overrode your request.
Can't really
Use
estimate level=Incremental
Or
estimate level=Differential
From the manual:
Using this command, you can get an idea how many files will
be backed up, or if you are unsure about your Include statements in
your FileSet, you can test them without doing an actual backup. The
Neat! I think this is new for 1.38, as I'm pretty certain you weren't
able to do that in the past.
Robert Nelson wrote:
Use
estimate level=Incremental
Or
estimate level=Differential
From the manual:
Using this command, you can get an idea how many files will
be backed up, or if
I don't know for sure, I've only been using Bacula for a couple of weeks.
But looking at the CVS logs it looks like it was added in June, 2004.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Novosielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 4:17 PM
To: Robert Nelson
Cc: 'Francisco
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
As mentioned before, I see the same effect when changing the timing:
running the SD on a low end system (400 MHz P II) makes the problem
go away reliably - with h/w compression on.
I am more and more convinced that this is a subtel timing issue
19 matches
Mail list logo
