Re: [Bacula-users] Followup on mount request

2006-09-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
As far as I can tell, Bacula is working perfectly normally, the only problem is that Volume FNI0016 is bad or unreadable. You can turn on debug in the SD say to level 400 using the setdebug command and then issue a mount command. That might tell you more precisely why Bacula does not want to

Re: [Bacula-users] DVD labeling not working on second volume

2006-09-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 14 September 2006 01:34, Richard Mortimer wrote: Some data from my tests below. I'm working with current CVS (13/Sep) plus a few patches to make relabel work (I don't think that they will change behaviour of the second volume stuff). Note I've sent this data to bacula-devel and

Re: [Bacula-users] DVD labeling not working on second volume

2006-09-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
See my notes below. On Thursday 14 September 2006 01:34, Richard Mortimer wrote: Some data from my tests below. I'm working with current CVS (13/Sep) plus a few patches to make relabel work (I don't think that they will change behaviour of the second volume stuff). Note I've sent this data

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow FD

2006-09-14 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
Thanx for your help,I solved the problem substituting the Ethernet card with a new Gigabit one, then plugged the server into the Gigabit switch.Now everything works great!Thanx again!Gabriele. Gabriele Bulfon - Sonicle S.r.l. Tel +39 028246016 Int. 30 - Fax +39 028243880 Via Felice

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong start time stored for Volume Use Duration?

2006-09-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 14 September 2006 03:45, Jo Rhett wrote: So right now the Volume Use start time is set by the start time of the first job stored on it. On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:04:47PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: I haven't looked at the code, but I believe it is based on the

[Bacula-users] configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

2006-09-14 Thread José Miguel Gallardo Garrido
Hi all,How can I solve the problem that says: configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables? I try to install bacula 1.38.11 and 1.38.10 in RedHat EL 4Thanks - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web

Re: [Bacula-users] Followup on mount request

2006-09-14 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, On 9/14/2006 12:33 AM, Michael Brennen wrote: On Wednesday 13 September 2006 05:16 pm, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, On 9/13/2006 11:59 PM, Michael Brennen wrote: A quick followup on the mount request mail I just sent... Using the console I unmounted and remounted that volume, and it still

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape mount problem update/resolution

2006-09-14 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, On 9/14/2006 6:03 AM, Michael Brennen wrote: I was able just now to work further with the FNI0016 tape that was not mounting. then feel free to ignore my previous mail :-) Arno I purged and relabeled that particular tape, and now it is mounting. All I can figure is that the

Re: [Bacula-users] configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

2006-09-14 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 9/14/2006 10:46 AM, José Miguel Gallardo Garrido wrote: Hi all, How can I solve the problem that says: configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables? I try to install bacula 1.38.11 and 1.38.10 in RedHat EL 4 Install all the necessary tools? gcc, g++, lots of development

Re: [Bacula-users] configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

2006-09-14 Thread Martin Simmons
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:46:03 +0200, José Miguel Gallardo Garrido said: Hi all, How can I solve the problem that says: configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables? I try to install bacula 1.38.11 and 1.38.10 in RedHat EL 4 Look in the file config.log to see why configure fails.

Re: [Bacula-users] configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

2006-09-14 Thread José Miguel Gallardo Garrido
Hi,My config.log says:This file contains any messages produced by compilers whilerunning configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake.It was created by configure, which wasgenerated by GNU Autoconf 2.59. Invocation command line was $ ./configure --sbindir=/root/bacula/bin

Re: [Bacula-users] configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

2006-09-14 Thread Martin Simmons
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:22:12 +0200, José Miguel Gallardo Garrido said: Hi, My config.log says: snip configure:1849: checking for C compiler version configure:1852: gcc --version /dev/null 5 gcc (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-3) Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-users Digest, Vol 5, Issue 76

2006-09-14 Thread José Miguel Gallardo Garrido
Martin, I paste here the output that I have when I do your instructions:gcc -v -g -O2 -Wall foo.cLeyendo especificaciones de /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.6/specsConfigurado con: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/u sr/share/info --enable-shared

[Bacula-users] Problems with hard links

2006-09-14 Thread James Ray
All, I am seeing problems when trying to restore a hard link. This comes around when I am trying to restore a file where the file it was originally a hard link of has disappeared (which is allowed to happen). I see the following message: 14-Sep 11:56 malfunction-fd:

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with hard links

2006-09-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 14 September 2006 13:31, James Ray wrote: All, I am seeing problems when trying to restore a hard link. This comes around when I am trying to restore a file where the file it was originally a hard link of has disappeared (which is allowed to happen). I see the following

[Bacula-users] migration devices (was migration- waiting on max storage devices

2006-09-14 Thread Fred Dussault
Good Morning Thanks for your insight. to save you the trouble, here is the file device definition, I belive it has default values. the only thing I changed was the arcive device path from /tmp Device { Name = FileStorage Media Type = File Archive Device = /bacvols/volumes

[Bacula-users] Issues concerning the production release of Bacula 1.39.x

2006-09-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Thank you for your responses to my previous email. Since there were no negative responses to my proposal, the official release schedule is as follows: We will probably make several more beta release of 1.39.x between now and 15 October, then on my return sometime between the 15th and

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with hard links

2006-09-14 Thread Keith Phipps
Good Afternoon, I was wondering if there was a way to purge all the pending jobs out of the database. I've managed to purge the ones with the Volstatus was error. Now they're set to purged. However, there are months and months of stuff in there that need to be wiped out - if there is a console

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong start time stored for Volume Use Duration?

2006-09-14 Thread Jo Rhett
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:20:21AM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: On Thursday 14 September 2006 03:45, Jo Rhett wrote: So right now the Volume Use start time is set by the start time of the first job stored on it. On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:04:47PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: I

Re: [Bacula-users] onfigure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

2006-09-14 Thread Martin Simmons
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:06:02 +0200, José Miguel Gallardo Garrido said: /usr/libexec/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.6/collect2 --eh-frame-hdr -m elf_i386 -dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.6/../../../crt1.o /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.6/../../../crti.o

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong start time stored for Volume Use Duration?

2006-09-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 14 September 2006 19:41, Jo Rhett wrote: On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:20:21AM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: On Thursday 14 September 2006 03:45, Jo Rhett wrote: So right now the Volume Use start time is set by the start time of the first job stored on it. On Wed,

Re: [Bacula-users] Issues concerning the production release of Bacula 1.39.x

2006-09-14 Thread Vladimir Doisan
I have some questions regarding the latest 1.39 and future 1.40 So far how does encryption influences the backup speed? How about the encryption and compression? Is it a lot slower then compression alone? Which encryption algorithm is used for encryption? (I assume everything that OpenSSL

[Bacula-users] Tape drive blocked / cleared

2006-09-14 Thread Michael Brennen
I think I can recount this accurately; again, it is a situation that came up before I was aware of it, so I'm not quite sure how I got there. I think I have cleared it up, so I thought I would post this for comment. Last night after the FNI0016 tape would not mount, apparently due to a label

[Bacula-users] New to Tapes

2006-09-14 Thread Jack
Hello, I have been using bacula for over six months now to dump backups to disk. I have recently aquired a EZ17 autoloader with the AIT2 tape drive in it (a SDX500 if I'm not mistaken). Here is a partial of the dmesg output: [17179591.40] Vendor: EXABYTE Model: EXB-210 Rev:

Re: [Bacula-users] New to Tapes

2006-09-14 Thread Michael Brennen
On Thursday 14 September 2006 05:01 pm, Jack wrote: I have been using bacula for over six months now to dump backups to disk. I have recently aquired a EZ17 autoloader with the AIT2 tape drive in it (a SDX500 if I'm not mistaken). ... *mount ... 3301 Issuing autochanger loaded drive 0

[Bacula-users] FD Connection timed out - Catalog mismatch

2006-09-14 Thread Support
Dear All While backing up a laptop with a large amount of data the laptop went into suspend/standby mode while the 10GB of data was being written to tape (approx through put to tape is about 10 GB /hour). See below. I have fixed the laptop's power options it now never goes into stand by or

Re: [Bacula-users] New to Tapes

2006-09-14 Thread Jack
Michael Brennen wrote: On Thursday 14 September 2006 05:01 pm, Jack wrote: I have been using bacula for over six months now to dump backups to disk. I have recently aquired a EZ17 autoloader with the AIT2 tape drive in it (a SDX500 if I'm not mistaken). ... *mount ... 3301

Re: [Bacula-users] New to Tapes

2006-09-14 Thread Michael Brennen
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Jack wrote: I didnt see the tape verification stuff, I'll try that now. Also I'd like to report that i got the tape to unmount successfully by putting in the mt -f $4 offline in the mtx-changer :) For what it's worth, the attached patch is one that I must apply to

Re: [Bacula-users] New to Tapes

2006-09-14 Thread Jack
Michael Brennen wrote: On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Jack wrote: I didnt see the tape verification stuff, I'll try that now. Also I'd like to report that i got the tape to unmount successfully by putting in the mt -f $4 offline in the mtx-changer :) For what it's worth, the attached