On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 09:33:49PM -0400, Reynier Pérez Mira wrote:
Hi every:
My Bacula is crashed some days ago and I don't know why because I'm the
only who have access to this server and also I'm the only one who make
changes in Bacula. I check the logs and see that:
14-Sep 21:28
Hi Stephen,
Perhaps it's possible with this configuration:
Allow Higher Duplicates = no
Cancel Running Duplicates = yes
You can also try to change the Schedule to avoid incremental backups
starting when full backups are running. It costs a more complicated
schedule resource but it's much
Actually, you can do it - Allow Higher Duplicates really means ANY duplicate
job, not only a higher one. I just tested it and an incremental job is
cancelled if either full or incremental instance of the same job is still
running.
So in my case Allow Higher Duplicates did the trick :)
--
Are dir also running on this machine ?
Nope.
So perharps the db config is too low ( default conf tend to be friendly with
hardware resources )
and if batch-insert is enable, bacula write the batch table also in /tmp so
there's concurrency on the same drive.
Reading up on this in the manual,
Graham Keeling wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 09:33:49PM -0400, Reynier Pérez Mira wrote:
bsys.c:431 in bacula-3.0.2 looks like it is to do with pid files. Perhaps
an old pidfile needs removing, or perhaps an old bacula process has got stuck.
Hi:
You're right. I run ps -ax | grep bacula
Hello all, I'm hoping someone can help me. I'm having an issue with a
backup schedule on a new install of bacula. I have a scheduled defined as:
Schedule {
Name = Monthly
Run = Full 1st fri at 23:05
Run = Incremental 2nd-5th fri at 23:05
Run = Incremental sat-thu at 23:05
}
and a host
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Roy Kidder bac...@jehster.net wrote:
Hello all, I'm hoping someone can help me. I'm having an issue with a
backup schedule on a new install of bacula. I have a scheduled defined as:
Schedule {
Name = Monthly
Run = Full 1st fri at 23:05
Run = Incremental
Silver Salonen wrote:
Actually, you can do it - Allow Higher Duplicates really means ANY
duplicate
job, not only a higher one. I just tested it and an incremental job is
cancelled if either full or incremental instance of the same job is still
running.
So in my case Allow Higher
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 17:36:25 Stephen Thompson wrote:
Silver Salonen wrote:
Actually, you can do it - Allow Higher Duplicates really means ANY
duplicate job, not only a higher one. I just tested it and an incremental
job is cancelled if either full or incremental instance of the
2.4.4 (not able to update yet)
I keep getting errors like this on update slots and incremental updates of
the bacula-dir server
Subject: Bacula: Admin Fatal Error of UpdateSlots.2009-09-13_12.30.43 Full
14-Sep 18:24 msslay-dir JobId 104670: Fatal error: sql_update.c:122 Update
failed:
Ah, thanks for the info, but this still is not the behavior that I am
looking for. This does indeed cancel incrementals if a full is already
running (actually even if a full is merely scheduled), but it goes both
ways, it also cancels my fulls if an incremental is already running or
Hello Folk,
I'm tweaking a full off-site backup design (with Incrementals
Forever, off of weekly Differentials), and I've stumbled across a
restoration problem [still learning, forgive me] - the problem generally
is, the Full Backups I've performed (which are manually set to be
retained for
Watson, Joe wrote:
Trying to label the tapes I have with Label Barcodes on bconsole and it
errors out every time. It times out every time I try labeling a volume
on a tape.
In the section:
Device {
Name = Ultrium 4-SCSI
Look at the line:
Archive Device = /dev/sg0
It is likely that it
2009/9/15 Shawn sh...@artemide.us
Hello Folk,
I'm tweaking a full off-site backup design (with Incrementals Forever,
off of weekly Differentials), and I've stumbled across a restoration problem
[still learning, forgive me] - the problem generally is, the Full Backups
I've performed
[bonks self in the head]
You're right!
Thank you, John! :)
--
Shawn Qureshi
Artemide, Inc.
IT Specialist
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 13:10 -0400, John Drescher wrote:
2009/9/15 Shawn sh...@artemide.us
Hello Folk,
I'm tweaking a full off-site backup design (with Incrementals
On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:35:41 +0200, Roger Meier said:
Hi all
We have some problem with bacula. I don't know where the Problem is,
because all of our
7 hosts have the same configuration (only different include/exclude file
list and hostname)
All works fine now for some weeks, but now
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Are dir also running on this machine ?
Nope.
So perharps the db config is too low ( default conf tend to be friendly with
hardware resources )
and if batch-insert is enable, bacula write the batch table also in /tmp so
there's concurrency on the same drive.
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:07:57 +0200, Juergen Koch said:
Hi,
I want to split my vhost-Dir in 2 Jobs.
I use this in the FileSet:
File = /var/www/vhosts/[a-m]*
and
File = /var/www/vhosts/[n-z]*
The Job starts, but I receive this message:
Could not stat /var/www/vhosts/[n-z]*:
18 matches
Mail list logo
