Hi Didier,
I send this to the mailing list... the discussion should stay there, I
think.
15.10.2009 09:55, didier.faur...@free.fr wrote:
Hello thanks for reply
About the last answer
for btape error
in fact i'm Administrator of the server
But do you, on the shell, have administrative
Hello,
Recently the question came up (during a Bacula course) about whether or not
the Bacula scheduler (the part that creates the Job from the Schedule
resource) starts jobs according to their Priority if they all have the same
start time.
The answer is yes, the schedule maintains a list
On Wednesday, 14 October 2009 17:38:59 +0100,
Martin Simmons wrote:
In the FileSet resource for this client I'm doing backup of all the
/etc, but there are some files and directories which aren't able to
be copied. I consider that this is because the process (running with
bacula: bacula)
Martin
Thanks for the pointer. Looks like it's the way to go.
cby
Martin Simmons wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:40:33 -0700 (PDT), cby said:
Running bacula on Centos 5.2 I have a tape volume which has more than one
occurrence of the same filename as a result of appending to tape. I
15.10.2009 13:34, Daniel Bareiro kirjoitti:
Do you think that it is appropriate to starting bacula-fd with the
script in /etc/bacula/scripts using the following lines in the
/etc/rc.local file?
# DGB - 20091012
# Starting bacula-fd on boot
if [ -x /etc/bacula/scripts/bacula-ctl-fd ]; then
15.10.2009 14:03, Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti:
15.10.2009 13:34, Daniel Bareiro kirjoitti:
Do you think that it is appropriate to starting bacula-fd with the
script in /etc/bacula/scripts using the following lines in the
/etc/rc.local file?
# DGB - 20091012
# Starting bacula-fd on boot
if
Is Tandberg LTO-4 HH (3504-LTO model) compatible with bacula backup system ?
Thanks
--
Damien CHEVALIER
Piing
Groupe LOGIFI
250 rue des Droits de l'Homme
33240 Saint André de Cubzac
Tél 05 57 42 63 60
Fax 05 57 42 09 37
email dcheval...@piing.fr
Hi,
15.10.2009 13:38, Piing - Damien CHEVALIER wrote:
Is Tandberg LTO-4 HH (3504-LTO model) compatible with bacula backup system ?
Almost certainly, it mostly depends on your operating system... under
linux/unix, as long as you've got the proper device nodes like
/dev/nstX and can use the
Thanks for all your help.
I think Im understanding a little more of bacula :P
im in my 3 tape, and is asking me this:
Device Fita (/dev/st0) is not open.
Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for:
Pool:FullBackupsTapePool
Media type: Tape
What is that?
Thanks
Hi,
I have a box with pretty old operating system, which cannot be upgraded,
but I need to have there a bacula client. The newest version I have run
there was 1.36.6. I have Director 2.4.4. The full backup was OK, but
when I start an Incremental Job I got this Error:
15-říj 14:40 the-host-fd:
today i've got some special message from bacula:
15-Okt 14:46 host-sd JobId 3913: Warning: Director wanted Volume
ARCHIVE-0009.
Current Volume EXTRA not acceptable because:
1998 Volume EXTRA status is Append, volume has recycling disabled.
why needs the recycle flag to be enabled to write
I just put a tape... the one labeled quinta-feira-2
Should it start?
*list media pool=FullBackupsTapePool
+-++---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+---+-+
| mediaid | volumename |
Hello,
I'm using bacula for servers but the problem is that both servers and
where bacula runs are on the same room. I'd like to know how to
implement a duplication of the data bacula stores in order to put a
copy on another location (via internet). Of course it is not possible
to copy
I'm using bacula for servers but the problem is that both servers and where
bacula runs are on the same room. I'd like to know how to implement a
duplication of the data bacula stores in order to put a copy on another
location (via internet). Of course it is not possible to copy simply the
Hi.
I am actually thinking about same thing at this time, and well... deduplicated
replication over network under linux seems to be a little bit complicated
task... But I have an idea that could solve this issue, however, I don't have
it implemented yet... but the idea is to use DRBD and lessfs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I currently have bacula setup to backup to disk volumes that reside on
encrypted file systems.
I have just added a tape drive on another SD and would like the data
on the tapes to be encrypted.
Is this possible without using encryption from
Hello Again,
Thanks for previous help,
I changed the configuration of bacula-sd and left as follows:
Device {
Name = FITA
Media Type = DDS-72
Archive Device = /dev/nst0
LabelMedia = yes;
Random Access = Yes;
AutomaticMount = yes;
RemovableMedia = no;
AlwaysOpen =
This is not a solution at all, because Bacula every time you create new
backup will create new virtual tapes, and since rsync deduplicate only
files, not entire amount of data that is going to be transfared, this do not
solve anything for us. Acctually I am not even sure if we would use LVM
Yeah it will, but when new full backup is taken, you again copy entire
operating system copy over network, even though you have already a few copy of
that operating systém on a target server. So, yeah it will low the traffic, but
not that much as a smarter solution could. :-) Every time you
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, John Drescher might have said:
I'm using bacula for servers but the problem is that both servers and where
bacula runs are on the same room. I'd like to know how to implement a
duplication of the data bacula stores in order to put a copy on another
location (via
2009/10/15 marek.m.sto...@tieto.com:
Yeah it will, but when new full backup is taken, you again copy entire
operating system copy over network, even though you have already a few copy
of that operating systém on a target server. So, yeah it will low the
traffic, but not that much as a
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:05 AM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/15 marek.m.sto...@tieto.com:
Yeah it will, but when new full backup is taken, you again copy entire
operating system copy over network, even though you have already a few copy
of that operating systém on a
I may be missing something, but using smaller volume files should work
for you. You would still need to transfer the entire job, but only the
volumes that that job touched. So for example, instead of a 1G job
appending to the end of a 10G volume, and having to send the entire 10G
again, if
You can throttle rsync with --bwlimit, unless you would need to use the
entire bandwidth to finish in your time window.
Mike Eggleston wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, John Drescher might have said:
I'm using bacula for servers but the problem is that both servers and where
bacula runs are
Hi,
Operating System will be gnu/linux debian.
If the Tandberg LTO-4 device is known by my OS, i can consider it will
function with bacula system ?
Thanks.
Arno Lehmann a écrit :
Hi,
15.10.2009 13:38, Piing - Damien CHEVALIER wrote:
Is Tandberg LTO-4 HH (3504-LTO model) compatible
Matt Richards wrote:
I currently have bacula setup to backup to disk volumes that reside on
encrypted file systems.
I have just added a tape drive on another SD and would like the data
on the tapes to be encrypted.
Is this possible without using encryption from the FD?
My solution to
What should I do?
2009/10/15 John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com
I just put a tape... the one labeled quinta-feira-2
Should it start?
*list media pool=FullBackupsTapePool
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Pedro Bordin Hoffmann
pedro.hoffm...@raidbr.com.br wrote:
What should I do?
I am not sure why your tapes have status Recycle yet are not getting
recycled. I do not recall seeing this before. I was hoping that
someone else on the list could solve that problem.
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:34:57 -0300, Daniel Bareiro said:
On Wednesday, 14 October 2009 17:38:59 +0100,
Martin Simmons wrote:
In the FileSet resource for this client I'm doing backup of all the
/etc, but there are some files and directories which aren't able to
be copied. I consider
Hi,
Familiarize yourself with the 'mt', 'tapeinfo', and 'mtx' commands. They are
standard Linux commands for dealing with the tape drives.
Then try out the 'btape' regular and autochanger tests:
Hi all,
There is a page in the Bacula manual that lists some autochangers:
http://bacula.org/3.0.x-manuals/en/concepts/concepts/Supported_Autochangers.html#Models
Here are the ones I've used with Bacula so far, that are not listed there:
Dell PowerVault 128T with 1 LTO-1 drive and 20 slots
This probably won't fix the problem here, but I suggest changing /dev/st0 to
/dev/nst0. Using /dev/st0 can cause data loss if the tape rewinds without
Bacula knowing.
__Martin
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:30:33 -0300, Pedro Bordin Hoffmann said:
Thanks for all your help.
I think Im
Has anyone compiled a 3.0.1 or 3.0.2 mac binary with ssl that they would be
willing to share?
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this
2009/10/15 Fabrizio Reale fabrizio.re...@redomino.com
Hi all,
Hi,
I must backup some servers with old distros which do not provide a recent
bacula version. For example one server has the 1.38.11-8.
My director and storage version is 2.4.2.
How many versions can I go back without problems?
W dniu 15 października 2009 17:13 użytkownik Brian Debelius
bdebel...@intelesyscorp.com napisał:
I may be missing something, but using smaller volume files should work
for you. You would still need to transfer the entire job, but only the
volumes that that job touched. So for example,
I'm thinking of a solution (maybe not so simple):
- Before a job starts, a small script checks if the file exists and if it
is a socket (assuming it is possible to know the file name at this time). If
it is a real file (which means it is a new file, the script can replace the
file by a
Hi,
15.10.2009 21:23, Sébastien VINOT wrote:
...
I'm thinking of a solution (maybe not so simple):
- Before a job starts, a small script checks if the file exists and if
it is a socket (assuming it is possible to know the file name at this
time). If it is a real file (which means it is a
Today while inserting attributes my mysql partition ran out of space. I
thought I had addressed that because both bacula and mysql seemed to be hung up
waiting. Once I freed up disk space, mysql suddenly started getting a lot of
CPU time, and I thought I was okay. Then bacula sent me a job
My tape was working fine on /dev/st0, what is the difference ?
2009/10/15 Martin Simmons mar...@lispworks.com
This probably won't fix the problem here, but I suggest changing /dev/st0
to
/dev/nst0. Using /dev/st0 can cause data loss if the tape rewinds without
Bacula knowing.
__Martin
2009/10/15 Pedro Bordin Hoffmann pedro.hoffm...@raidbr.com.br:
My tape was working fine on /dev/st0, what is the difference ?
There is a chance of tape corruption with using /dev/st0 if the os
rewinds with out bacula knowing and then bacula assumes (which it
always does) that the tape was
Am Donnerstag, den 15.10.2009, 17:26 -0300 schrieb Pedro Bordin
Hoffmann:
My tape was working fine on /dev/st0, what is the difference ?
It depends. On linux /dev/nst0 is the device used for non rewinding
tapes and /dev/st0 rewinds the tape. Don't know about BSD.
Regards,
P. Allgeyer
--
Peter
Hi,
15.10.2009 22:13, Dupree, Craig wrote:
Today while inserting attributes my mysql partition ran out of
space. I thought I had addressed that because both bacula and
mysql seemed to be hung up waiting. Once I freed up disk space,
mysql suddenly started getting a lot of CPU time, and I
hi,
I'm very newbie and I want to use a DELL TL2000 autochanger.
I made 7 pool in config file, one for each day of week:
Monday, Tuesday, etc.
I want to use one volume for day and label it same as barcode. When I
tried label barcode I must to put all tape in only one pool:
*label barcode
The
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Nicola Quargentan
nic...@quargentan.com wrote:
hi,
I'm very newbie and I want to use a DELL TL2000 autochanger.
I made 7 pool in config file, one for each day of week:
Monday, Tuesday, etc.
I want to use one volume for day and label it same as barcode. When
Hi Arno,
Theoretically, yes, though it will lock up your tape drive for a
while, and might leave you with an incomplete backup. If the job was
actually finished writing to tape, and you're absolutely sure
everything you need ended up on tape, you could do that.
A full backup would lock
Pedro Bordin Hoffmann wrote:
Thanks for all your help.
I think Im understanding a little more of bacula :P
im in my 3 tape, and is asking me this:
Device Fita (/dev/st0) is not open.
Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for:
Pool:FullBackupsTapePool
John Drescher ha scritto:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Nicola Quargentan
nic...@quargentan.com wrote:
hi,
I'm very newbie and I want to use a DELL TL2000 autochanger.
I made 7 pool in config file, one for each day of week:
Monday, Tuesday, etc.
I want to use one volume for day and
Hi people:
I'm a little confused about how bacula deals with Pools and Volumes.
I'm using Automatic labeling with a Pool that uses a unique Volume (as
file disk) that is continuosly increasing its size. I have a unique
volume named Vol-0001 with a size of 900 GB and status Append.
If I pretend
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Jose Perez jvoorhe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi people:
I'm a little confused about how bacula deals with Pools and Volumes.
I'm using Automatic labeling with a Pool that uses a unique Volume (as
file disk) that is continuosly increasing its size. I have a unique
Jose Perez wrote:
Hi people:
I'm a little confused about how bacula deals with Pools and Volumes.
I'm using Automatic labeling with a Pool that uses a unique Volume (as
file disk) that is continuosly increasing its size. I have a unique
volume named Vol-0001 with a size of 900 GB and
Marek Simon wrote:
Hi,
I have a box with pretty old operating system, which cannot be upgraded,
but I need to have there a bacula client. The newest version I have run
there was 1.36.6. I have Director 2.4.4. The full backup was OK, but
when I start an Incremental Job I got this Error:
Bacula's retention times for volumes are based on the date the volume was
last written. So, every time Bacula writes a backup job to a volume, your
15-day retention clock starts over from zero. As long as your volume's
status is Append, bacula will keep writing to it.
That's the kind of
Hi:
If you did not set any condition to limit the disk volume size or
usage the volume will grow till it exhausts your storage then the
volume retention period of 15 days kicks in.
That's exactly what is going to happen soon If I don't solve this now.
See the first part of the following
Hi there,
We're currently using bacula 3.0.2 to backup some windows XP and Vista clients.
Every now and then, while a backup (Diff or Full) are running, the user may
turn of his/her laptop, network issues may occur or whatever else may cause a
connection error and then obviously the backup
54 matches
Mail list logo