A common reason for bacula-dir not starting up is database connection
issues. Can you ensure that your database server is running before
bacula-dir is started?
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
Dan, thanks for your suggestion, I don't know what to answer... When I
type bacula-dir in
sorry, what I have said doesn't make sense
the problem is that this doesn't work:
/etc/init.d/bacula-director start
this works:
bacula-dir
I would like to correct the problem with /etc/init.d/bacula-director start
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:12, gianni giann...@gmail.com wrote:
A common reason
On 2/26/2011 2:20 AM, gianni wrote:
sorry, what I have said doesn't make sense
the problem is that this doesn't work:
/etc/init.d/bacula-director start
this works:
bacula-dir
I would like to correct the problem with /etc/init.d/bacula-director start
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:12,
giannife fe schrieb:
Hi, my bacula works perfectly, except that I have to start manually
bacula-dir (bacula-sd and bacula-fd start as they should).
I've got bacula 5.0.2 precompiled for ubuntu.
Here is the output of some commands:
root@dragon:/home/ego# /etc/init.d/bacula-director start
*
Yesterday I had to make a recovery of a huge amount of data caused by a disc
crash of one of our Windows Clients.
To recovery worked without a problem, but afterwards I had problems with some
applications that couldn't start because of permission problems with their data.
After some hours of
Ralf Gross schrieb:
giannife fe schrieb:
Hi, my bacula works perfectly, except that I have to start manually
bacula-dir (bacula-sd and bacula-fd start as they should).
I've got bacula 5.0.2 precompiled for ubuntu.
Here is the output of some commands:
root@dragon:/home/ego#
On 2/25/2011 11:15 PM, Mehma Sarja wrote:
On 2/25/11 2:50 PM, dev001 wrote:
Sanity check?
It is an excellent idea and efficient usage of resources. I have a
laptop user who rarely gets backed up - a local storage solution would
be ideal for delayed copying.
Backups are initiated by the
On 2/26/11 1:19 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On 2/25/2011 11:15 PM, Mehma Sarja wrote:
On 2/25/11 2:50 PM, dev001 wrote:
Sanity check?
It is an excellent idea and efficient usage of resources. I have a
snip
If you have no connectivity to the Dir, backups will not be run.
Oopsie, looks like that
