Sorry to insist but am I the only one who've noticed that ?
How can I solve this problem ?
14/04/2014 11:44, le dahut wrote :
Hello,
Bacula 5.2.5-0ubuntu6.2 (on 12.04 LTS)
In bacula-sd.conf I have :
Name = FileStorage
LabelMedia = yes
Automatic Mount = yes
Archive
Hello Klaas
Sorry to insist but am I the only one who've noticed that ?
Notice what? The mount command used in a device don't fail the job? Well
I never needed it.
Having the detail of your mount operation would probably help a bit or
at least knowing in which context you are trying to do
23/04/2014 13:23, John Drescher wrote :
Sorry to insist but am I the only one who've noticed that ?
How can I solve this problem ?
I would try creating a run before job that uses ssh to connect to the
remote machine with the SD and in this run before job check if the
mount succeeds.
John
Ubuntu 12.04 LTS' Bacula version is Bacula 5.2.5. Maybe this is fixed in
higher versions ? (in which case we will recompile a newer Bacula)
I am not sure if this is a bug or by design.
John
--
Start Your Social
23/04/2014 15:07, Téïcée Bacula wrote :
Hello Klaas
Sorry to insist but am I the only one who've noticed that ?
Notice what? The mount command used in a device don't fail the job? Well
I never needed it.
Having the detail of your mount operation would probably help a bit or
at least
There could be several ways to manage this and IMHO the following should
be valid:
- based on John's answer, you might run a script before on the FD
hosted by your SD which will fail the job accordingly. The matter here
is not to actually mount the drive rather than testing the fact the
On 4/23/2014 9:24 AM, John Drescher wrote:
- you might also consider to use Messages resource and then capture
the mount message and do the appropriate commands / actions accordingly
Good point. With this you could accomplish the task inside of bacula
and without having to use ssh.
You
Le 23/04/2014 16:05, le dahut a écrit :
23/04/2014 15:07, Téïcée Bacula wrote :
Hello Klaas
Sorry to insist but am I the only one who've noticed that ?
Notice what? The mount command used in a device don't fail the job? Well
I never needed it.
Having the detail of your mount operation
23/04/2014 16:44, Téïcée Bacula wrote :
Le 23/04/2014 16:05, le dahut a écrit :
23/04/2014 15:07, Téïcée Bacula wrote :
Hello Klaas
Sorry to insist but am I the only one who've noticed that ?
Notice what? The mount command used in a device don't fail the job? Well
I never needed it.
On 21/04/14 15:25, Lloyd Brown wrote:
Definitely more than I expected. Although, I have to say, RAM usage on
this host isn't really much of a concern. At the moment, the mysqld
process is only using just over 1GB of RAM, and this host has 128G.
Possibly I need to tune MySQL to keep more of
10 matches
Mail list logo