Re: [Bacula-users] Issue restoring from multiple tapes

2017-10-27 Thread Andrew Ryder
Try pulling down the latest git version of bacula 9.0.x .. I pulled it down and so far it politely asked for the next tape and patiently waited for it to be loaded. On 09/25/2017 12:59 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 09/24/17 20:24, Andrew Ryder wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm having an issue after

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrading to Bacula 9.0.4

2017-10-27 Thread ted
Hey All, Thank you, for taking the time to add to the things to take note of when proceeding with and upgrade like this... It has been quite some time since this Bacula system was upgraded from 5 to 7, and I for sure needed some refreshers on what to consider and plan for.. Of course the

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrading to Bacula 9.0.4

2017-10-27 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Yes, all the existing scripts connect to the DB named "bacula".  It is easily changed, for example, the regression scripts all put everything into the DB named "regress".  Typically you either manually edit the scripts (as I usually do) and change the

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrading to Bacula 9.0.4

2017-10-27 Thread Jonathan Hankins
FWIW, for anyone wanting to go the route of a side-by-side install of different versions on different ports / config files, etc.: Be careful with the DB creation / upgrade / backup scripts, as they will default to a particular file / db name / db instance. You don't want to blow up or talk to the

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrading to Bacula 9.0.4

2017-10-27 Thread ted
Hi Martin, and Olivier, Thank you for answering my questions! My first thought was to try an inline install of 9, changing the directories and port #'s as you had noted. However, after the input provided by you guys, I think the best path for my upgrade is the port everything over to Bacula

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrading to Bacula 9.0.4

2017-10-27 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:05:00 +, ted said: > > I have a quick question about a Bacula upgrade to Bacula 9.0.4. I have a > Bacula director, and a number of storage units at 7.0.4 running on a BSD > server with postgres for the Bacula database. My question is can Bacula 9 be > run inline

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrading to Bacula 9.0.4

2017-10-27 Thread Olivier Delestre
Hi, An extract of Release 9.0.0, "Compatibility: – As always, both the Community Director and Storage daemon(s) must be upgraded at the same time. Any File daemon running on the same machine as a Director or Storage daemon must be of the same version." Le 26/10/2017 à 19:05, ted a

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-dir failed to connect to bacula-sd on Freenas.

2017-10-27 Thread Gi Dot
That should be it then. Thanks for the help. On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Gary R. Schmidt wrote: > On 25/10/2017 21:34, Davide Franco wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As far as I know, both sd and director needs to be on same version. >> >> I can’t find it in Bacula