Re: [Bacula-users] can file retention be job rather than client based?

In the message dated: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 06:25:43 -0700, The pithy ruminations from Stephen Thompson on [Re: [Bacula-users] can file retention be job rather than client based?] were: => => Thanks Kern. => => I think given the limited nature of his need, I may use a postrun script +1 for this

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.x.x and Solaris 11.3 (and OpenSUSE)...

On 2018-04-11 03:52, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote: I'm very surprised that your build is not working and you have to disable libtool. Unfortunate I never tried Solaris Compiler Suite with Bacula. I haven't used solaris in forever but back when, libtool did not work with Sun's CC. Linker

Re: [Bacula-users] can file retention be job rather than client based?

On 2018-04-11 01:59, Kern Sibbald wrote: I have never used two Client definitions to backup the same machine, but in principle it would work fine. The closest I have is a "cluster ip" floating between two machines, with 3 client/job definitions: one for each physical machine (backing up /etc

Re: [Bacula-users] can file retention be job rather than client based?

Thanks Kern. I think given the limited nature of his need, I may use a postrun script to simply wipe database records out of band. Also if I did use multi-client definitions, I would need to use the same pool as they all go to the same monthly tapes. Stephen On 4/10/18 11:59 PM, Kern

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.x.x and Solaris 11.3 (and OpenSUSE)...

Hello, I'm building Bacula 9.0.6 on Solaris 11 using gcc (I'm not sure if I used gcc provided by Oracle or installed externally) and the following configure (which forces 64bit compilation and debugging symbols): CXXFLAGS="-m64 -g" CFLAGS="-m64 -g" LDFLAGS="-m64 -g" ./configure

Re: [Bacula-users] precedence of config parameters in bacula?

Hello, 2018-04-10 13:13 GMT+02:00 Johannsen, Thorsten : > Hello list, > > in my mail > > > [Bacula-users] scheduled job different that manually initiated job? --WAS: > Re: Backup problem with 1 of 2 Raspberry PI using Raspbian (Debian) > > one of the problems I was

Re: [Bacula-users] can file retention be job rather than client based?

Hello Stephen, What you are asking for, as you suspect, does not exist and implementing it would be a bit problematic because every Job would need to keep it's own retention period.  For one client, there can be any number of Jobs -- typically thousands.  Thus the catalog would grow faster