On 1/22/19 5:12 PM, Hodges wrote:
> Been thinking about updating my bacula which is 5.2.6 and is running on
> an oldish linux server which runs Debian 8 Jessie on an intel Atom i686
> processor
>
> All the downloads on the website for 9.2.2 are for AMD64 so far as I can
> see, which I guess will
Been thinking about updating my bacula which is 5.2.6 and is running on
an oldish linux server which runs Debian 8 Jessie on an intel Atom i686
processor
All the downloads on the website for 9.2.2 are for AMD64 so far as I can
see, which I guess will not work on my system. Am I right on this?
below with the volume conty-2546 (612 bytes). for ex.
the behavior may seem normal because no data to save so we do not
display ( with query + 5 ).
In this case why referenced a volume (pool + Filesystem)
May be an error on my part, but I do not remember a similar behavior
before (v7).
I
Hello Kern,
thanks for the answer. I'll do. But for the time being I found a
workaround. Digging in the source, I found, that dbcheck only tests
whether any entry in the job table has "hascache" <>0. Even if there is
just one entry, dbcheck declines to celar up the orphaned path entries.
Hello Bacula Users!
There are a lot of different tools for managing a Bacula system, some GUI,
some for reports only and every new week we have a new one in the wild
(just kidding)! So I thought I'll introduce you another one. :) More GUI
for Bacula, more fun.
The GUI is called IBAdmin (Inteos
