Hi Heitor,
No network bottlenecks. There isn't a single 100Mbit device in the path.
Both servers are connected to the same switch, and the path to the
backup server is 10GbE all the way.
Thanks for your input.
Best regards,
Peter
On 01.03.2019 3:12, Heitor Faria wrote:
Hello Peter,
On 01.03.2019 1:50, Adam Nielsen wrote:
I'm backing up 2 servers with Bacula, one with Windows 2016, the other
one with CentOS. The hardware is described below. The Windows server is
much more powerful than the Linux server in all respects, and should
theoretically deliver data to the Bacula
On 2019-02-06 20:33, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
We are pleased to announce the release of Bacula version 9.4.2. It is
already released to Source Forge and bacula.org. Binaries for selected
should be available in the near future.
This is a bug fix release to the prior version (9.4.1) that
> I'm backing up 2 servers with Bacula, one with Windows 2016, the other
> one with CentOS. The hardware is described below. The Windows server is
> much more powerful than the Linux server in all respects, and should
> theoretically deliver data to the Bacula server at a much higher rate.
>
after several attempts and test. I managed to make it work Bacula-FD
9.4.2
I had disable openssl, acl, libtool and xattr
./configure --enable-client-only --without-openssl --disable-libtool
--disable-xattr --disable-acl --sbindir=/etc/bacula/bin
--sysconfdir=/etc/bacula/bin
Hi folks,
I'm backing up 2 servers with Bacula, one with Windows 2016, the other
one with CentOS. The hardware is described below. The Windows server is
much more powerful than the Linux server in all respects, and should
theoretically deliver data to the Bacula server at a much higher rate.
On 2/28/2019 8:06 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
On 2/28/19 2:23 PM, Martin Simmons wrote:
That suggests the function accept4 was defined at compile time by
fails with
errno=38 (ENOSYS) at run time.
I don't know what to answer.
I'm not competent enough to understand the difference between the
On 28.02.19 17:59, Sven Hartge wrote:
> On 28.02.19 17:17, Hodges wrote:
>
>> When I try to start bacula in systemd I get a 'failed' message saying
>> unit bacula-director.service is masked
>>
>> Does this matter - I guess so. What to do about it? I have just
>> installed bacula 9.4.2 from the
I've been running Bacula for about one year now. I recently started receiving
emails from my Bacula director server stating "Bacula: Intervention needed".
Example:
Subject: Bacula: Intervention needed for efixf-rip03-fm.2019-02-27_23.05.04_05
Body: 27-Feb 23:40
Hi.
I install gcc and g++ on AIX-7. all OK.
But the result of "make" (only client)
On Bacula 5.0.1, 5.2.13, 7.4.7 and 7.9.5:
Compiling xattr.c
xattr.c: In function 'bxattr_exit_code build_xattr_streams(JCR*, FF_PKT*)':
xattr.c:2334:8: error: 'os_build_xattr_streams' was not declared
On 28.02.19 17:17, Hodges wrote:
> When I try to start bacula in systemd I get a 'failed' message saying
> unit bacula-director.service is masked
>
> Does this matter - I guess so. What to do about it? I have just
> installed bacula 9.4.2 from the debian repository into Debian 10 and am
> trying
When I try to start bacula in systemd I get a 'failed' message saying
unit bacula-director.service is masked
Does this matter - I guess so. What to do about it? I have just
installed bacula 9.4.2 from the debian repository into Debian 10 and am
trying to get it working again
Steve Hodge
--
On 2/28/19 2:23 PM, Martin Simmons wrote:
That suggests the function accept4 was defined at compile time by fails with
errno=38 (ENOSYS) at run time.
I don't know what to answer.
I'm not competent enough to understand the difference between the two; I
cannot also tell why it is defined and
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:25:48 +0100, Andrea Venturoli said:
>
> On 2/20/19 5:23 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I've got such a NAS where I've been running bacula-sd 7.4.0 (self
> > compiled from sources) for years.
> >
> > Now I'm trying to upgrade to 9.2.2 (same Director,
OK. thanks for your answers.
I test:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/mhhaque/entry/how_to_use_gcc_or_g_compiler_on_aix_7?lang=en
http://www.cybercanibal.com/articulos-tecnicos/instalacion-de-servicios/95-instalacion-de-cliente-bacula-50x-en-aix-61-con-gcc
i will show the
On 2/20/19 5:23 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.
I've got such a NAS where I've been running bacula-sd 7.4.0 (self
compiled from sources) for years.
Now I'm trying to upgrade to 9.2.2 (same Director, same SD config file,
same compilation procedure).
The daemon starts, but Director cannot
16 matches
Mail list logo
