Re: [Bacula-users] Disk setup for best performance on backups

On 2020-01-20 10:56, Jason Voorhees wrote: > > - Does it matter a lot choosing XFS instead of ext4 as filesystem? It is worth noting that even Red Hat, long the champion of ext*, has officially abandoned it and will do no further development on it. (And frankly, it didn't come a day too soon.)

Re: [Bacula-users] AWS VTL + Bacula

Hi Jose, Thank you for your reply but we choose to try another solution, just a S3 with an NFS mount. AWS VTL was too confuse to use... Em sáb., 18 de jan. de 2020 às 09:37, Jose Alberto escreveu: > HI > > Who RestoreStorage? > > show config of RestoreStorage. > > Device aws.vtlchanger

Re: [Bacula-users] Disk setup for best performance on backups

Hi > I'm planning a Bacula deployment on AWS in the following weeks. I have some > doubts about disk performance for Disk based backups. I use tapes, so you should take my response with a grain of salt. Question though, how do one protect the backup from being damaged if one is compromised and

[Bacula-users] Disk setup for best performance on backups

Hello guys: I'm planning a Bacula deployment on AWS in the following weeks. I have some doubts about disk performance for Disk based backups. Based on the idea that Bacula writes data on big files (i.e. 100 GB each volume), what technical considerations should I have for the underlying storage

Re: [Bacula-users] Backups to S3

You're right, I completely forgot about costs. Definitely, using S3 plugin will be much more cheaper than using Amazon Storage Gateway VTL. On my scenario, Cloud (S3) is the only place where I could save my backups, but I fully understand the comparison you made about your on premises

Re: [Bacula-users] Error: bsock.c:429 Write error sending 65536 bytes to Storage daemon:xxxx:9103: ERR=broken pipe

On 1/18/2020 5:55 AM, Marco Marino wrote: I cannot enable jumbo frames because client and server are 2 hops away and I cannot modify the network. They use public ips for connection, so I can only reduce MTU server side. Why is there an improvement of reliability when MTU = 1400 in your

Re: [Bacula-users] Issue with config setting "Max Virtual Full Interval"

Can you post the JobDefs named "blhwsync11" and also the Pool resource definitions? __Martin > On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:57:45 +, "Shaligram Bhagat, Yateen (Nokia said: > > Thanks Martin, > > Yes, other backups were running at the time of this jobid 5738, > I have 100 devices to handle

Re: [Bacula-users] Issue with config setting "Max Virtual Full Interval"

Great! I'm glad I can help. Radek pon., 20 sty 2020 o 12:58 Shaligram Bhagat, Yateen (Nokia - IN/Bangalore) < yateen.shaligram_bha...@nokia.com> napisał(a): > Thanks Radosław, > > > > Yes, other backups were running at the time of this jobid 5738, > > I have 100 devices to handle ~200

Re: [Bacula-users] Issue with config setting "Max Virtual Full Interval"

Thanks Radosław, Yes, other backups were running at the time of this jobid 5738, I have 100 devices to handle ~200 concurrent backup jobs. Looks like there was shortage of free device for reading the previous full backup, although a device was reserved for writing. Regards Yateen

Re: [Bacula-users] Issue with config setting "Max Virtual Full Interval"

Thanks Martin, Yes, other backups were running at the time of this jobid 5738, I have 100 devices to handle ~200 concurrent backup jobs. Looks like there was shortage of free device for reading the previous full backup, although a device was reserved for writing. Regards Yateen