**Problem Description**
Trying to get the following configuration to work (the real one is more
complex, but this is a minimal example, although it's still quite long):
Imagine having 3 hosts, all linux.
Host Alice: Runs bacula-fd sending local data to Bob.
Host Bob: Runs bacula-fd,
On 6/24/22 14:37, Josh Fisher wrote:
If it is running in a jail, then how does it have access to all zfs
datasets? Doesn't bacula-fd have to run as root no matter what OS it is
running on? How else can it backup all of the other plugins, etc.?
I'm no TrueNAS, but FreeBSD user: I usually
On 6/20/22 06:35, Justin Case wrote:
Thats right. Such a plugin is something like a wrapper/installer that
creates a jail environment for an existing application and hopefully
provides a nice interface. So in the case of Bacula it would be a jail
where all components are installed, so that
Hello Olivier,
On 6/24/22 13:27, OLIVIER DELESTRE (Personnel) wrote:
Hi,
Before updating my production server in version 10.0.6, i want make a new test
Vm ( CentOs 7.9 ) and Bacula 9.6.7, like the production.
it's 11.0.6, and RPMs are very different
I Use the New repo ,
Hi,
Before updating my production server in version 10.0.6, i want make a
new test Vm ( CentOs 7.9 ) and Bacula 9.6.7, like the production.
I Use the New repo ,
https://www.bacula.org/packages/xxx/rpms/9.6.7/el7/x86_64/
But when i install a conflict appear :
yum install
> 1) i'm not still sure is a compatibility trouble.
I reply to myself, because still i don't think is a 'compatibility' trouble,
and, as st.paul 'lightned' in the road to damasco, i've understood.
Storage daemons are effectively some virtualization hosts (Proxmox), and
have two addresses, one
