Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-16 Thread Brian A. Seklecki (Mobile)
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 15:23 -0500, Dan Langille wrote: My hesitance about combining installation packages (fink, ports...) is more a matter of packages installing duplicated libraries to meet dependencies. And then I get into trouble thinking I have version 2 when in fact my code

Re: [Bacula-users] Installing bacula-fd on Mac OS/X

2008-02-16 Thread Brian A. Seklecki (Mobile)
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 15:51 -0500, Brian A. Seklecki (Mobile) wrote: aspect of things a lot more as I stumble my way through my BBA. Apple BTW, Apple's Q3 financial statement from Nov2007 reports 22 billion USD in assets, including 9 billion in cash, and 38 million in Goodwill. ~BAS (You

Re: [Bacula-users] NFS Permission Problems

2008-02-16 Thread Brian A. Seklecki (Mobile)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mounts/for_backup# ls -ld /mounts/for_backup/paul_home drwxrwx--x 93 1002 1002 8192 2008-02-15 08:31 /mounts/for_backup/paul_home You just need to sync up your UIDs temporarily. On FreeBSD I would recommend that you just Jail/Chroot into the new mount-point with a

[Bacula-users] 2.2.6 Client OS/X / Darwin Packages

2007-11-28 Thread Brian A. Seklecki (Mobile)
Pkgsrc[.org] packages for 2.2.6 client at: http://digitalfreaks.org/~lavalamp/bacula-clientonly-2.2.6_Darwin-8.11.1-i386.tgz http://digitalfreaks.org/~lavalamp/bacula-clientonly-2.2.6_Darwin-9.1.0-powerpc.tgz

Re: [Bacula-users] 2.2.6 Client OS/X / Darwin Packages?

2007-11-25 Thread Brian A. Seklecki (Mobile)
On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 17:29 +, Markus Falb wrote: On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:53:43 -0500, Brian A Seklecki (Mobile) wrote: Anyone feel free to share? Also, how are you building? Native DarwinCode building environment? i am working on a port for macports, http://www.macports.org/ i

[Bacula-users] 2.2.6 Client OS/X / Darwin Packages?

2007-11-21 Thread Brian A Seklecki (Mobile)
Anyone feel free to share? Also, how are you building? Native DarwinCode building environment? ~BAS - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.

[Bacula-users] DIY OS/X Bacula Packages w/ Pkgsrc

2007-11-21 Thread Brian A. Seklecki (Mobile)
It should also be noted that Pkgsrc can help port Bacula to other exotic platforms w/ non-standard userland and tool-chains (old commercial unices) ~BAS --- [bootstrap Pkgsrc for Darwin (4 cmds)] goto: http://www.netbsd.org/docs/pkgsrc/platforms.html#darwin # df -H |grep -i pkg /dev/disk3s2

[Bacula-users] Bacula 2.2.6 Client for OpenBSD 4.1/i386 (back/foward Port)

2007-11-20 Thread Brian A Seklecki (Mobile)
All: OpenBSD 4.1 still has 6-9 months before EOS/EOL. Here are the Bacula 2.2.6 client-only binaries for OpenBSD 4.1/i386 (back/forward Port) -Backport for Bacula (Bacula was added to ports after 4.1) -Forward port for OpenBSD (Port version is 2.0.x still)

[Bacula-users] Pkgsrc Bacula 2.2.5 (WAS: Re: Bacula user seeks maintainer)

2007-11-05 Thread Brian A Seklecki (Mobile)
I updated bacula to the recent 2.2.2 release, but as said I can Thank you very much for the 2.0x bump to 2.2 no longer... That's a shame -- pkgsrc is the best hope of getting Bacula onto exotic platforms. 2.2.5 was a minor patch-level. Has anyone tried manually bumping the Makefile and

Re: [Bacula-users] Old versions of Bacula

2007-11-02 Thread Brian A Seklecki (Mobile)
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 16:00 +, Weber, Philip wrote: Hi, Does anyone know if it is possible to get hold of old versions of Bacula source (or Solaris packages?). I am struggling to get a File Daemon compiled for Solaris 2.6. It might be lack of intelligence on my part, but it occurs to

Re: [Bacula-users] OpenBSD 4.1 and Bacula

2007-11-01 Thread Brian A Seklecki (Mobile)
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/sysutils/bacula/Makefile?rev=1.8content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup Its revision 2.0.3., but you have a -client flavor for FD-only if you want to have a FreeBSD or NetBSD system as the DIR. ~BAS ~BAS On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 13:52 +, Douglas DeWitt

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple Options {} in Fileset - Order of Evaluation

2007-11-01 Thread Brian A Seklecki (Mobile)
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 19:56 +, Martin Simmons wrote: On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 22:50:02 -0400, Brian A Seklecki (Mobile) said: Per the doc excerpt below, I read this to mean: First Matching Rule Stops Further Evaluation. Then, per the example below the except below regarding

[Bacula-users] Multiple Options {} in Fileset - Order of Evaluation

2007-10-31 Thread Brian A Seklecki (Mobile)
Per the doc excerpt below, I read this to mean: First Matching Rule Stops Further Evaluation. Then, per the example below the except below regarding: [...snip...] wildfile = *.Z wildfile = *.gz Options { Exclude = yes RegexFile = .* } File =

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore Problems

2007-10-30 Thread Brian A Seklecki (Mobile)
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 16:45 +0100, Christof Klaus wrote: hello luiz, you didnt mention where you expect the file to be restored...the restore-location given in the job is /tmp .. did you look there ? christof klaus. Luiz: Restore jobs defined in bacula-dir.conf are normally used a

Re: [Bacula-users] Sudden errors using bacula 2.2.5 on freebsd 6.2

2007-10-26 Thread Brian A Seklecki (Mobile)
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 15:32 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, for the long logs. We're running Bacula 2.2.5 on FreeBSD 6.2-p8 using a Sony SDT-5000 linked to a Tekram 395U Adapter. The Adapter is new, Sounds like dying hardware. Try to eliminate hardware/software. Stop your storage

Re: [Bacula-users] Client-only configure option (but why no analogous Storage-only option?)

2007-10-26 Thread Brian A Seklecki (Mobile)
configuration without this option. This option greatly facilitates building a Client on a client only machine. This is fantastic. But why is there also not an equivalent option for building only the Storage Daemon? For example, I will be running the Storage Daemon only on a

Re: [Bacula-users] stored build problems centOS5/postgresql

2007-10-24 Thread Brian A Seklecki (Mobile)
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 12:25 -0400, Michael Galloway wrote: good day all, i'm trying to build 2.2.5 on centOS5 with postgresql. my config looks /builddir/build/BUILD/postgresql-8.1.9/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c:949: undefined reference to `SSL_CTX_new'

Re: [Bacula-users] spurious tracebacks

2007-10-23 Thread Brian A Seklecki (Mobile)
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 12:11 +0200, IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig) wrote: hi all i am currently running bacula-2.1.5 on my backup-server (and 2.1.4 on the clients), on debian/etch (using the debian-packages from packman) every now and then (the last one was today;

Re: [Bacula-users] multi-destination e-mail

2007-10-02 Thread Brian A Seklecki (Mobile)
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 11:33 +0200, luyigui loholhlki wrote: hi can some one tell me how to send the notification e-mail to different people what to put on the bacula-dir.conf file The best method is to adjust the destination defined in the messages {} section of

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-fd on Solaris Sparc 5.8

2007-09-27 Thread Brian A Seklecki (Mobile)
www.sunfreeware.com should have packages for you -- if they don't, be sure to harass them until they do. That place has responsible for keeping Solaris usable for the last 8 years :) ~BAS On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 11:13 +0200, Volker Lieder wrote: Hello, i have solved the issue, my installation

Re: [Bacula-users] backup fail with Fatal error: backup.c:873 Network send error to SD. ERR=Broken pipe

2007-09-27 Thread Brian A Seklecki (Mobile)
1) Be sure that the messages resource on the SD is setup to report errors back to the DIR. You should get them via e-mail/console then 2) Be sure to run btape test (see manual) to ensure that your drive/media combination is correct 3) Run the SD with foreground+debugging information 4) Try

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula doesnt recycle and/or hangs

2007-09-27 Thread Brian A Seklecki (Mobile)
Once the file-volume has been purged/pruned/recycled, the next job that uses it theoretically opens it for write/overwrite at 0-byte descriptor. Its just a PITA waiting for that -- of course if it was a real tape, it would have to mt erase the volume, but for virtual tape files, a feature to zero