Hm - wrong keyboard combination send the mail before finished it:
Error message is at the bottom:
On 01/30/2017 04:41 PM, Mike Fröhner wrote:
> Hello good people,
>
> I always thought my 8 years of extensive usage of bacula makes me a
> master of it, but I have failed :-p.
>
> Currently, I am che
Hello good people,
I always thought my 8 years of extensive usage of bacula makes me a
master of it, but I have failed :-p.
Currently, I am checking a foreign bacula setup for disaster restore
capabilities and I am running into a restore issue when I am trying to
restore data via bextract.
Th
Am 30.04.2012 13:40, schrieb Milos Zupancic:
> We have the same problem with restoring to Windows 2008 servers using
> 5.2.6 client.
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Geert Stappers
> mailto:geert.stapp...@vanadgroup.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Op 20120425 om 16:01 schreef Christopher Hylarides:
>
I confirm that the downgrade of the client worked for me too
many thanks Christopher
Hi all
We have the same problem with restoring to Windows 2008 servers
using 5.2.6 client.
I'll also try this workaround to see if it will solve the problem.
Kind regards,
Milos
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at
Hi all
We have the same problem with restoring to Windows 2008 servers using 5.2.6
client.
I'll also try this workaround to see if it will solve the problem.
Kind regards,
Milos
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Geert Stappers <
geert.stapp...@vanadgroup.com> wrote:
> Op 20120425 om 16:01 schr
Op 20120425 om 16:01 schreef Christopher Hylarides:
> On 12-04-21 2:27 PM, Marco Carcano wrote:
> >
> > I (guess) have succesfully installed bacula 5.2.6 on my CentOS 5.6
> > Server (Physical). I have also installed the Windows client on a 2003
> > SBS (virtualized with KVM on another machine)
> >
Dear Bruno
I have 2 servers: alu01, (Windows 2003 SBS) and alu02 (Linux)
the second mail I wrote was just to show that my server setup was
right, as I was able to backup and recovery on alu02 (the linux
server), and I was able to backup from alu01 (the Windows server) too,
but that I was no
We had this exact same issue restoring on Windows with 5.2.6 as well
(backups worked fine). Downgrading to 5.0.3 for the windows client
fixed it (my research showed a known bug that will hopefully be in the
next release).
Christopher Hylarides
Systems Administrator
OANDA Corporation
+1.416.593
You try to restore on alu02-fd when the windows client is called
alu01-fd
:D
On Sunday 22 April 2012 15.48:10 Marco Carcano wrote:
> by the way, I have another Linux server, and if I try to restore on it
> it works like a charm and I got the files restored
>
> anyone that wants to help this
by the way, I have another Linux server, and if I try to restore on it
it works like a charm and I got the files restored
anyone that wants to help this poor newbie?
the following is what I got when I try to restore the other linux
server (the working one)
Run Restore job
JobName: R
Dear list
I hope that someone outthere want to help me
I'm a totally newbie with bacula, so I hope you will forgive me if I
may have misunderstood something
I (guess) have succesfully installed bacula 5.2.6 on my CentOS 5.6
Server (Physical). I have also installed the Windows client on a 200
I've created separate volumes for my separate domains and everything seems to
be running well now.
+--
|This was sent by rmc...@teamdms.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--
I am not sure why I am getting this error. I had done a test backup after
setting everything up and everything worked correctly. The only thing that has
changes is the virtual tape filled up and it created a new virtual tape.
Everything is on a large raid and is mounted to the filesystem and acc
I don't know what else might be useful.
The version that I am attempting to use for the restore is: 3.0.1
The backup was written with version: bacula-2.5.28-b1
-Jason
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 15:52 +0100, Graham Keeling wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 09:47:13AM -0
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 09:47:13AM -0400, Jason A. Kates wrote:
> This is a tape volume with 29 jobs on it with a retention period of 12
> months.
>
> llist volume=AX7321L4
> MediaId: 176
>VolumeName: AX7321L4
> Slot: 45
>PoolId: 2
> MediaType: LT
This is a tape volume with 29 jobs on it with a retention period of 12
months.
llist volume=AX7321L4
MediaId: 176
VolumeName: AX7321L4
Slot: 45
PoolId: 2
MediaType: LTO-3
FirstWritten: 2009-04-04 06:06:49
LastWritten: 2009-04-25 00:18:29
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:13:02AM -0400, Jason A. Kates wrote:
...
> 28-May 20:32 backup-server-sd JobId 67400: Error: block.c:275 Volume
> data error at 339:441! Wanted ID: "BB02", got "". Buffer discarded.
...
I used to get this error on restore if I had the 'autopurge corruption bug'.
More in
Any hint as to get past this restore error?
Thanks -Jason
28-May 20:31 backup-server-sd JobId 67400: End of file 338 on device
"nst0" (/dev/nst0), Volume "AX7321L4"
28-May 20:32 backup-server JobId 67400: Error: attribs.c:423 File size
of restored
file
/fs2/restore2/C
Hi Martin,
Thank you for your tips,
here are the result of the sql commands:
mysql> select count(*) from File where jobid=16435;
+--+
| count(*) |
+--+
| 2828311 |
+--+
1 row in set (32.97 sec)
mysql> select count(*) from File where jobid=16435 and not filenameid=(selec
It would be useful to run these two sql commands to see what is in the
catalog:
select count(*) from file where jobid=16435;
select count(*) from file where jobid=16435 and not filenameid=(select
filenameid from filename where name='');
Also, what happens if you do 'mark *' at the restore promp
Sorry i forgot the DB.
I use Mysql version: 5.0.27-standard on another Solaris 10 server.
When the Bacula is busy building the list; the Database is almost not working (
1% to 3% ) and the Bacula server is busy 100%. But when Bacula does a list for
a smaller job , about 400,000 files, the bui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Louis-Andre Larose wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a strange error when I try to restore a job on Bacula 1.38.11
> on Solaris 10 ( i know this is old, but it has been running for 18
> months without a glitch ) .
>
> I have to restore part of
Hi,
I have a strange error when I try to restore a job on Bacula 1.38.11 on
Solaris 10 ( i know this is old, but it has been running for 18 months without
a glitch ) .
I have to restore part of a fileset from a Bacula job that is 55GB and
contains 2,828,311 files.
The file l
Thanks for that, I never even spotted that option before.
Kind regards
Chris Sarginson
Technical Support
UKFast.Net Ltd
(t) 0870 111 8866
(f) 0870 458 4545
"The UK's Best Hosting Provider" ISPA Awards 2007, 2006 and 2005
Dedicated Servers - Managed Hosting - Domain Names- http://www.ukfast.net
Hi,
10.01.2008 13:32, Chris Sarginson wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I'm currently trying to do a restore, after having to rescan in some
> volumes using bscan, however it's telling me that it is unable to find
> any full backup prior to today.
>
> I can see the files by performing llist files jobid=14
Hi Guys,
I'm currently trying to do a restore, after having to rescan in some
volumes using bscan, however it's telling me that it is unable to find
any full backup prior to today.
I can see the files by performing llist files jobid=145 through
bconsole, but when I try to select the most recen
Hi Wolfgang,
I, with the help of my friend Tom, got the problems solved. Here it
goes:
1.) I have an Exabyte-8900 tape drive that passed all the btape tests
with flying colors. So I didn't think there was a problem with the
drive. We'll there was. In the bacula-sd.conf file the option unde
Hello,
On 12/29/2005 1:15 AM, Trevor Morrison wrote:
Arno,
I believe I have fixed part of the problem by using a working copy of a
friends dir conf file's fileset. But when I restore it fills the mount
points: /var, /usr/, /home,/boot correctly but still overflows the /
partition and conseq
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I have no problems backing up a particular working server (RH 9) with
> about 3.2 GB worth of data. I am testing out the restore of this
> backup on another box and it will restore to the test box, but will try
> to write 16 GB worth of data instea
Arno,
I believe I have fixed part of the problem by using a working copy of a
friends dir conf file's fileset. But when I restore it fills the mount
points: /var, /usr/, /home,/boot correctly but still overflows the /
partition and consequently fails the restore. When I do a du -ks from
the
Hello,
On 12/28/2005 12:37 AM, Trevor Morrison wrote:
Arno,
I can send the job output which is 40 MB or 2.97 MB compressed to you if
you email will accept something that large. Let me know.
Quite large... 40 MB Job report output?
I could accept such a mail, but I doubt that I will find the
Arno,
I can send the job output which is 40 MB or 2.97 MB compressed to you if
you email will accept something that large. Let me know.
Thanks,
Trevor
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
On 12/27/2005 10:57 PM, Trevor Morrison wrote:
Hi,
I have no problems backing up a particular working serve
Hello,
On 12/27/2005 10:57 PM, Trevor Morrison wrote:
Hi,
I have no problems backing up a particular working server (RH 9) with
about 3.2 GB worth of data. I am testing out the restore of this
backup on another box and it will restore to the test box, but will try
to write 16 GB worth of d
Hi,
I have no problems backing up a particular working server (RH 9) with
about 3.2 GB worth of data. I am testing out the restore of this
backup on another box and it will restore to the test box, but will try
to write 16 GB worth of data instead of just 3.2! It is only a 10 GB
drive to be
34 matches
Mail list logo