Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3 locked and not responding

2007-07-16 Thread Alfredo Marchini
Hi, bacula-dir is blocked again: I've just made this tests: - time command from bconsole: works - mysqladmin processlist: there are 2 processes: +-++---++-+--+---+--+ | Id | User | Host | db | Command | Time | State | Info

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3 locked and not responding

2007-07-16 Thread Alfredo Marchini
Hi again, I've just finished to make another test: the sleep process in mysqladmin processlist is the status query command that i run when I run status director command from bconsole and that is blocked when it starts showing me the running jobs (the future schedule jobs are shown correctly,

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3 locked and not responding

2007-07-16 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 16.07.2007 11:21,, Alfredo Marchini wrote:: Hi, bacula-dir is blocked again: I've just made this tests: - time command from bconsole: works Good, so the DIR is basically up and running. - mysqladmin processlist: there are 2 processes:

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3 locked and not responding

2007-07-16 Thread Alfredo Marchini
Hi, I've found also another error in one of the forked pid of bacula-dir that i've got straced: I attach it: I don't know why, but it seems a sql error... The phrase: You have an error in... seems mysql. Bye Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, 16.07.2007 11:21,, Alfredo Marchini wrote:: Hi,

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3 locked and not responding

2007-07-05 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 05.07.2007 12:07,, Alfredo Marchini wrote:: Hi Arno, I don't know if you know bacula source code, A bit, but I usually look for problems in the configuration as, in my experience, the source code is quite stable. Of course, there are bugs, but these should be reproduceable in other

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3 locked and not responding

2007-07-05 Thread Alfredo Marchini
Hi, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, 05.07.2007 12:07,, Alfredo Marchini wrote:: Hi Arno, I don't know if you know bacula source code, A bit, but I usually look for problems in the configuration as, in my experience, the source code is quite stable. Of course, there are bugs, but

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3 locked and not responding

2007-07-05 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, 05.07.2007 13:07,, Alfredo Marchini wrote:: Hi, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, 05.07.2007 12:07,, Alfredo Marchini wrote:: Hi Arno, I don't know if you know bacula source code, A bit, but I usually look for problems in the configuration as, in my experience, the source code

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3 locked and not responding

2007-07-05 Thread Alfredo Marchini
Arno Lehmann wrote: Hello, 05.07.2007 13:07,, Alfredo Marchini wrote:: Hi, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, 05.07.2007 12:07,, Alfredo Marchini wrote:: Hi Arno, I don't know if you know bacula source code, A bit, but I usually look for problems in the

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3 locked and not responding

2007-07-05 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 05.07.2007 21:10,, Alfredo Marchini wrote:: ... about 2 weeks and the DIR will block again. I'll wait for it. Ok, that sounds reasonable. strace has many options, which I need to specify to view all the information useful to find the problem? Then I recommend you start playing with

[Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3 locked and not responding

2007-07-04 Thread Alfredo Marchini
Hi all, I've installed with rpm, on a Linux Fedora Core 6, a bacula-dir and bacula-sd daemon. On this server there is also a Mysql-5.0.x server that correctly talks with bacula daemons. Also there is a RAID-5 partition of a size of 1TB where I save my backups. The server make backups of 16

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3 locked and not responding

2007-07-04 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 04.07.2007 16:51,, Alfredo Marchini wrote:: Hi all, I've installed with rpm, on a Linux Fedora Core 6, a bacula-dir and bacula-sd daemon. On this server there is also a Mysql-5.0.x server that correctly talks with bacula daemons. Also there is a RAID-5 partition of a size of 1TB where

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3 locked and not responding

2007-07-04 Thread Alfredo Marchini
Hi, The system and db logs doesn't tell me anything about this problem, like all the director processes or thread are locked concurrently. If I restart only bacula-dir without restarting bacula-sd and 16 bacula-fd the system restart working fine. Now I have already restarted bacula-dir and all

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3 locked and not responding

2007-07-04 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 04.07.2007 17:40,, Alfredo Marchini wrote:: Hi, The system and db logs doesn't tell me anything about this problem, like all the director processes or thread are locked concurrently. If I restart only bacula-dir without restarting bacula-sd and 16 bacula-fd the system restart working

[Bacula-users] bacula 2.0.3 - schedule problem

2007-06-22 Thread Robert Garwacki
Hello, I am using bacula 2.0.3. There is a job scheduled in the config file with the following schedule definition: Schedule { Name = DefaultCatalogSchedule Run = daily at 21:10 } In this case in bconsole, command status director shows, that there is a scheduled job: Scheduled Jobs: Level

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 2.0.3 - schedule problem

2007-06-22 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 22.06.2007 12:07,, Robert Garwacki wrote:: Hello, I am using bacula 2.0.3. There is a job scheduled in the config file with the following schedule definition: Schedule { Name = DefaultCatalogSchedule Run = daily at 21:10 } In this case in bconsole, command status director

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 2.0.3 - schedule problem

2007-06-22 Thread tomasz
Robert Garwacki wrote: Hello, I am using bacula 2.0.3. There is a job scheduled in the config file with the following schedule definition: Schedule { Name = DefaultCatalogSchedule Run = daily at 21:10 } In this case in bconsole, command status director shows, that there is a

[Bacula-users] bacula 2.0.3 for Win32 can't use a Chinese folder name as Archive Device!

2007-05-21 Thread deshou mo
Hello, I encode the bacula-sd.conf file in UTF-8.The following is my Device resource definition: Device { Name = FileStorage Media Type = File Archive Device = H:\\xx ##where xx is a Chinese folder name. LabelMedia = yes Random Access = Yes AutomaticMount = yes

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 2.0.3 for Win32 can't backup top level Chinese folder!

2007-05-17 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 17 May 2007 04:26, deshou mo wrote: Dear Kern, I use UltraEdit to encode the bacula-dir.conf file in UTF-8 - no BOM or Unicode - ASCII Escaped,not UTF-8,Bacula can run fine. The next time I would address my questions to the bacula-users list. Nice. I am pleased to hear that it

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 2.0.3 for Win32 can't backup top level Chinese folder!

2007-05-16 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello Soo Mo, It would be better if you address your questions to the bacula-users list and if necessary copy me. That way, you will probably get additional responses, even from Chinese who are already successfully using Bacula ... On Wednesday 16 May 2007 12:27, deshou mo wrote: Dear

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 2.0.3 for Win32 can't backup top level Chinese folder!

2007-05-16 Thread Russell Howe
Kern Sibbald wrote: If anyone on this list knows of a Win32 tool that will write UTF-8 (not Unicode or UTF-16), please let me know. It's not really a win32 tool, but jEdit (text editor, written in Java) can output in pretty much any character set. http://www.jedit.org/ See Buffer Options

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 2.0.3 for Win32 can't backup top level Chinese folder!

2007-05-16 Thread deshou mo
Dear Kern, I use UltraEdit to encode the bacula-dir.conf file in UTF-8 - no BOM or Unicode - ASCII Escaped,not UTF-8,Bacula can run fine. The next time I would address my questions to the bacula-users list. Best regards,Soo Mo From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3 and ACLs

2007-05-03 Thread le dahut
To complete my message, I also get that sort of error : 03-mai 11:01 127.0.0.1-fd: RestoreFiles.2007-05-03_11.00.27 Error: acl.c:223 acl_from_text error on file /home/a/admin/: ERR=No such file or directory while in fact /home/a/admin IS present ...! but 03-mai 11:34 127.0.0.1-fd:

[Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3 and ACLs

2007-05-02 Thread le dahut
Hello, I'm using Bacula-2.0.3 with sqlite support and I get error messages on restore : 02-mai 13:58 127.0.0.1-fd: RestoreFiles.2007-05-02_13.58.21 Error: acl.c:223 acl_from_text error on file /home/alias/archives/: ERR=Conne ction refused 02-mai 13:58 127.0.0.1-fd:

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

2007-03-20 Thread Alan Brown
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote: Ok, I have an FD for SuSE 9.2 which should also work on SLES9. Statically linking was not possible, after some playing around, I always ended up with: I can not find static .a libraries for linux-gate (whatever that is) and libattr, so I assume these

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

2007-03-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 11:12, Alan Brown wrote: On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote: Ok, I have an FD for SuSE 9.2 which should also work on SLES9. Statically linking was not possible, after some playing around, I always ended up with: I can not find static .a libraries for

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

2007-03-20 Thread Alan Brown
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote: What I don't understand is why you don't build your own current (non-static) version of Bacula on your older systems. Because in several cases they won't compile - lack of libraries, etc. These are old boxes and they're frozen - no updates of core

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

2007-03-20 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 3/20/2007 2:15 PM, Alan Brown wrote: On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote: What I don't understand is why you don't build your own current (non-static) version of Bacula on your older systems. Because in several cases they won't compile - lack of libraries, etc. These are old

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

2007-03-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 14:51, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, On 3/20/2007 2:15 PM, Alan Brown wrote: On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote: What I don't understand is why you don't build your own current (non-static) version of Bacula on your older systems. Because in several cases

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

2007-03-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 14:15, Alan Brown wrote: On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote: What I don't understand is why you don't build your own current (non-static) version of Bacula on your older systems. Because in several cases they won't compile - lack of libraries, etc. Well, I

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

2007-03-20 Thread Alan Brown
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote: I'll add my results here - they seem to fit :-) Bad luck, Alan: I can't get a static FD even under SuSE 8.1. Seems to be some problem with the acl library. I tried to disable ACLS during configure, but --disable-acl was accepted but did not work. I

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

2007-03-19 Thread Alan Brown
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote: Has anyone built a bacula-fd for suse-9 at all? Yes. No rpms here, though. I'm quite sure someone else will have an rpm soon for the FD at least. Hopefully the above is true, but if I recall correctly, the Bacula project (i.e. Scott) is no longer

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

2007-03-19 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 3/19/2007 11:14 AM, Alan Brown wrote: On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote: Has anyone built a bacula-fd for suse-9 at all? Yes. No rpms here, though. I'm quite sure someone else will have an rpm soon for the FD at least. Hopefully the above is true, but if I recall correctly,

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

2007-03-17 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 16 March 2007 12:45, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, On 3/14/2007 11:30 AM, Alan Brown wrote: On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Xeos Laenor wrote: Congratulations to him (and surely the others) and thanks a lot to you ;-) Great Job guys ! Seconded. Has anyone built a bacula-fd for

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

2007-03-16 Thread Alan Brown
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote: Has anyone built a bacula-fd for suse-9 at all? Yes. No rpms here, though. All I need is a bacula-fd-static... Thanks AB - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-2.0.3

2007-03-16 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 3/10/2007 1:38 PM, Alexander Marx wrote: Hi, I searched for two days and didn't find a solution. Maybe you could give me a solution. OS: Kubuntu 6.10, bacula 2.0.3 from sf.net, compiled with all options, backup works well. Storage: NFS share mounted over gbit network

[Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3 - Tru64 binary?

2007-03-15 Thread Alan Brown
I'm after a bacula-fd binary for Tru64 V5.1 Has anyone compiled such a beast? - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

2007-03-14 Thread Alan Brown
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Xeos Laenor wrote: Congratulations to him (and surely the others) and thanks a lot to you ;-) Great Job guys ! Seconded. Has anyone built a bacula-fd for suse-9 at all? - Take Surveys. Earn Cash.

[Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3 in Debian sid

2007-03-14 Thread John Goerzen
Hi folks, I have uploaded Bacula 2.0.3 to Debian sid (unstable). Please feel free to download and try out. I believe that at this point the 2.0.x packages should be of higher quality than the 1.38.x ones already. I will be posting separately to the devel list some info for anyone that would

[Bacula-users] bacula-2.0.3

2007-03-13 Thread Alexander Marx
Hi, I searched for two days and didn't find a solution. Maybe you could give me a solution. OS: Kubuntu 6.10, bacula 2.0.3 from sf.net, compiled with all options, backup works well. Storage: NFS share mounted over gbit network Backup works relative fine (20GB/hour) CLIENT: Windows 2003

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

2007-03-13 Thread Felix Schwarz
Fedora {5,6} + EL 4 RPMs are released, too. Please note that there are efforts getting bacula into mainline Fedora. Andreas Thienemann did a great job there. I think that these RPMs (once accepted in Fedora) will find their way into Enterprise Extras which is good news to all EL users out

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

2007-03-13 Thread Xeos Laenor
Congratulations to him (and surely the others) and thanks a lot to you ;-) Great Job guys ! Franck 2007/3/13, Felix Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Fedora {5,6} + EL 4 RPMs are released, too. Please note that there are efforts getting bacula into mainline Fedora. Andreas Thienemann did a great

[Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

2007-03-11 Thread PattiMichelle
Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64) - see sourceforge.net rpms-contrib-psheaffer or (soon to be) the sbarnin repo. Thanks, PattiMichelle - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join

[Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-problem with RunAfterJob directive after upgrading

2007-03-08 Thread Ondrej PLANKA
Hi list, I discover problem with RunAfterJob directive in version 2.0.2 and now in 2.0.3 too. I have next directive in Job resource: RunAfterJob = /etc/bacula/scripts/disk_check.sh %j and the script disk_check.sh is following: size=`/usr/bin/mysql -e select JobBytes from Job where Job='$job' -u

[Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3

2007-03-07 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, I have released the source code for Bacula 2.0.3. This version consists mostly of bug fixes for a good number bugs reported since version 2.0.2 was released. The most important fix is for a critical problem of encrypted files being truncated during restore. Version 2.0.3 also has one

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3

2007-03-07 Thread Wolfram Schlich
* Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-07 20:49]: Hello, Hi Kern! I have released the source code for Bacula 2.0.3. Do you plan to update http://www.bacula.org/?page=news ? It seems to not have been updated since 2.0.1... http://freshmeat.net/projects/bacula needs love as well :-D Thanks