Thomas Traeger wrote:
Excellent point. The servers that are slowest to transfer are also the
busiest, my front end web server and my mail gateways (Av and spam
filtering).
That is certainly something to look further into. I could try turning
off compression for one cycle to prove the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Did you just remove compression from the definition?
I'm still looking for a way to EXPLICITLY disable compression.
DAve wrote:
Thomas Traeger wrote:
Excellent point. The servers that are slowest to transfer are also the
busiest, my front end
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Did you just remove compression from the definition?
I simply commented out the compression option in the FileSet section.
### FILESETS
FileSet {
Name = Web6
Include {
Options {
signature = MD5
#
Excellent point. The servers that are slowest to transfer are also the
busiest, my front end web server and my mail gateways (Av and spam
filtering).
That is certainly something to look further into. I could try turning
off compression for one cycle to prove the theory.
Thanks,
DAve
Good morning,
I have a question concerning reported data transfer rates between the
clients and the storage servers. All the above servers are connected to
my NOC clients via a 1gb network. The servers are connected to several
other clients via 100mb network and a 13mb VLAN.
Data rates for
On 11/10/06, DAve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning,I have a question concerning reported data transfer rates between theclients and the storage servers. All the above servers are connected tomy NOC clients via a 1gb network. The servers are connected to several
other clients via 100mb network
John Drescher wrote:
On 11/10/06, DAve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning,
I have a question concerning reported data transfer rates between the
clients and the storage servers. All the above servers are connected to
my NOC clients via a 1gb network. The servers are connected to several
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DAve wrote:
Good morning,
I'm not sure how to interpret the variation in rates. I don't think I
have a problem, though I would expect the backups across the 1gb network
to be far faster than they are. The backups across the 1gb network are
all
pedro moreno wrote:
On 11/10/06, Ryan Novosielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DAve wrote:
Good morning,
I'm not sure how to interpret the variation in rates. I don't think I
have a problem, though I would expect the backups across the 1gb
On 11/10/06, DAve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pedro moreno wrote: On 11/10/06, Ryan Novosielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
DAve wrote: Good morning, I'm not sure how to interpret the variation in rates. I don't think I have a problem, though I would
10 matches
Mail list logo
