On Monday 06 June 2005 11:09, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
Due to the increasing volume of spam, I have now restricted this list to
member only posting.
Good. My junk folder was filling faster than before during the last days...
All posts by non-subscribers
On Monday 06 June 2005 15:58, Alan Brown wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Like me, for instance. For some reason(*) a couple of my personal
domains feature quite frequently in spam forgeries.
, I prefer to try to inform real users that
their message has not been accepted
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Like me, for instance. For some reason(*) a couple of my personal domains
feature quite frequently in spam forgeries.
, I prefer to try to inform real users that
their message has not been accepted -- sending back a rejection message
is what 99.9% of
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote:
I don't see the difference, unless I am mistaken, in both cases the
message goes back to the same place.
The difference is that the reject/failure message is sent by the SMTP
_ORIGIN_ host, not the receiving one.
Oh that is interesting. I had never
