Re: [Bacula-users] bextract shows directories named *none* being restored?

2006-01-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, On Wednesday 18 January 2006 06:34, Jo Rhett wrote: Oh, no. /d is a new filesystem on the freshly built server, and '/d/restores' is the directory I'm bextracting to. Any thoughts on this problem? Any debug I can get for you? The output you are showing is very strange. I've never

Re: [Bacula-users] bextract shows directories named *none* being restored?

2006-01-17 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 05:41, Jo Rhett wrote: Nope. These are freebsd filesystems from the bacula server itself. There are windows backups on different tapes, none on these tapes. I guess I was incorrectly interpreting the /d/restores as a Win32 directory ... On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at

Re: [Bacula-users] bextract shows directories named *none* being restored?

2006-01-17 Thread Jo Rhett
Nope. These are freebsd filesystems from the bacula server itself. There are windows backups on different tapes, none on these tapes. On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 03:51:18PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote: It appears that you are dealing with a Win32 client. One important consideration here is that

Re: [Bacula-users] bextract shows directories named *none* being restored?

2006-01-16 Thread Jo Rhett
FreeBSD 6.0p2 with Bacula 1.36.3 stock compile options. It's a DDS-3 tape drive. The other threads talk about not being able to do a restore from the catalog is the same thing. Anyway, I'm pretty sure this is a bug now. Why? Because I get exactly one each time it changes directory, in or out.

Re: [Bacula-users] bextract shows directories named *none* being restored?

2006-01-16 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 16 January 2006 08:06, Jo Rhett wrote: FreeBSD 6.0p2 with Bacula 1.36.3 stock compile options. It's a DDS-3 tape drive. The other threads talk about not being able to do a restore from the catalog is the same thing. Anyway, I'm pretty sure this is a bug now. Why? It appears

[Bacula-users] bextract shows directories named *none* being restored?

2006-01-15 Thread Jo Rhett
So I'm successfully restoring from bextract, but it shows this... bextract: drwx-- 2 501 500 512 2005-10-09 20:37:09 *none* bextract: drwx-- 3 501 500 512 2005-10-05 23:31:50 *none* bextract: drwx-- 3 501 500 512 2005-10-05 23:31:50