On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Kyle Marsh might have said:
Hello again all,
I've tried looking in the manual for help, but I've found that while
the manual is fairly comprehensive, it's not remarkably accessible;
that is, while I'm sure my answers are probably in there somewhere,
I'm not at all sure
Thank you Arno,
This is rather what I expected. Kern seemed to say he was using the
backup scheme from the manual with several clients, so I'd still like
to see how that might work. However, your setup makes sense to me and
seems less fragile, so I think I'll go with it. I have a few
questions
Hello,
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:22:05 -0500
From: mikee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] need help managing disk configuration
Cc: bacula-users bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007
Hi,
23.06.2007 03:16,, Kyle Marsh wrote::
Thank you Arno,
This is rather what I expected. Kern seemed to say he was using the
backup scheme from the manual with several clients, so I'd still like
to see how that might work.
Well, Kern pointed out that this was an example, and I suppose by
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, David Romerstein wrote:
My gut tells me that, if one drive in a new-ish device fails, the
likelihood of a second failing at-or-near the same time is pretty high, as
the drives themselves are likely to be from the same manufacturing batch.
Your gut and my experience.
I've
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Jeff Kalchik wrote:
My point is that there are always alternatives. Speed costs, how fast do
you want to go.
Or put another way:
Good, Fast, Cheap - pick any two
-
This SF.net email is sponsored
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on RAID5 volumes. I pointed out that his high performance database had
been running on a RAID5 (hardware implementation over Fibre Channel)
volume set for 6 months.
With a lot of NVRAM in the storage cabinet? ;)
2Gb NVRAM (battery backed) in
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:44:03 -0700
From: Kyle Marsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] need help managing disk configuration
To: bacula-users bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 6/22/07, Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:44:03 -0700
From: Kyle Marsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] need help managing disk configuration
To: bacula-users bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Friday 22 June 2007 21:48, Kyle Marsh wrote:
On 6/22/07, Kern Sibbald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:44:03 -0700
From: Kyle Marsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] need help managing disk configuration
To: bacula-users bacula-users
Kyle Marsh wrote:
I've tried looking in the manual for help, but I've found that while
the manual is fairly comprehensive, it's not remarkably accessible;
that is, while I'm sure my answers are probably in there somewhere,
I'm not at all sure that I could find them, so I come to you for help.
Hi,
23.06.2007 02:03,, Kyle Marsh wrote::
Hello again all,
I've tried looking in the manual for help, but I've found that while
the manual is fairly comprehensive, it's not remarkably accessible;
Quite true, unfortunately...
This says nothing about how they interact with volumes, but to
Thank you Arno,
This is rather what I expected. Kern seemed to say he was using the
backup scheme from the manual with several clients, so I'd still like
to see how that might work. However, your setup makes sense to me and
seems less fragile, so I think I'll go with it. I have a few
questions
Dear All,
I have been given a rare opportunity to get hardware nicer then I have
ever had before. I now have a new with a 2Terabyte area for disk
backups. In the past, I only used tape and therefore volumes were
dictated by the tape. Now that I have this huge ocean for disk backups,
I'm
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Scott McDaniel might have said:
Dear All,
I have been given a rare opportunity to get hardware nicer then I have
ever had before. I now have a new with a 2Terabyte area for disk
backups. In the past, I only used tape and therefore volumes were
dictated by the
El jue, 21-06-2007 a las 06:55 -0500, mikee escribió:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Scott McDaniel might have said:
I'm doing this now and should end up with about ~2T of RAID5 when
I know that RAID5 is very appealing 'cause you end with 'a lot of usable
disk space' but, I always discourage to use
I know that RAID5 is very appealing 'cause you end with 'a lot of usable
disk space' but, I always discourage to use it.
Each chunk of data to be written to disk is divided in Numer of physical
RAID disks writes - 1 plus another write to store CRC on to the remaining
disk ( the CRC chunk is
Below are excerpts from my configs. My /u1 is a 1.4T filesystem. I backup
to disk daily and then migrate weekly to tape. If you jump down to the
sd.conf excerpt at the bottom I added a wrinkle of keeping each pool of
volumes for each client system in a separate directory. I then have
multiple
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, John Drescher wrote:
How about raid 6? With raid 6 you can loose 2 disks and you loose nothing. I
have around 10TB mostly on raid 6 using 250GB and 330 GB SATA drives and
they work great. I have had to replace a disk from time to time but I have
never had 2 go bad at
John Drescher wrote:
I know that RAID5 is very appealing 'cause you end with 'a lot of
usable disk space' but, I always discourage to use it.
Each chunk of data to be written to disk is divided in Numer of
physical RAID disks writes - 1 plus another write to store CRC on
While this debate on the various merits of RaidN vs. RaidX is
interesting and helpful, I don't believe it is what Scott was asking
about. He was asking how one should configure Bacula to make the best
use of his space. I looked at the example in the manual, here:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:30:20 -0400
John Drescher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that RAID5 is very appealing 'cause you end with 'a lot of usable
disk space' but, I always discourage to use it.
Each chunk of data to be written to disk is divided in Numer of physical
RAID disks writes
We can argue/discuss this until we're blue in the face but IMHO RAID10
is the way to go. Better performance, better redundancy, and better
reliability. And increasingly I want to do in in software rather than
hardware.
Oh, absolutely, this can be debated past the end of time. Different
El jue, 21-06-2007 a las 14:38 -0500, Jeff Kalchik escribió:
on RAID5 volumes. I pointed out that his high performance database had
been running on a RAID5 (hardware implementation over Fibre Channel)
volume set for 6 months.
With a lot of NVRAM in the storage cabinet? ;)
Regards
D.
El jue, 21-06-2007 a las 14:38 -0500, Jeff Kalchik escribió:
on RAID5 volumes. I pointed out that his high performance database had
been running on a RAID5 (hardware implementation over Fibre Channel)
volume set for 6 months.
With a lot of NVRAM in the storage cabinet? ;)
Actually, no.
25 matches
Mail list logo
