Re: [Bacula-users] painfully slow backups

2007-10-08 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 07.10.2007 20:19,, Ross Boylan wrote:: A full backup of the offending directory just ran in 7 hrs, 17 min with a rate of 160KB/s (1,416,688 files, 4.4GB SD bytes written). This is slightly more files and bytes than last month. This is almost twice as fast as previous performance (13

Re: [Bacula-users] painfully slow backups

2007-10-07 Thread Ross Boylan
A full backup of the offending directory just ran in 7 hrs, 17 min with a rate of 160KB/s (1,416,688 files, 4.4GB SD bytes written). This is slightly more files and bytes than last month. This is almost twice as fast as previous performance (13 hrs, 14 min and a rate of 86KB/s). This suggests

Re: [Bacula-users] painfully slow backups

2007-10-05 Thread Ross Boylan
Here are the results after moving the postgres database to another disk: Initial jobs were like the ones at the end of my earlier report, involving the directories with c 4,000 files. 93 seconds first try (277kb/s) 20 seconds 2nd try (1679kb/s) Then I switched to the one I used at the beginning

Re: [Bacula-users] painfully slow backups

2007-10-05 Thread Steve Thompson
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Ross Boylan wrote: I've been having really slow backups (13 hours) when I backup a large mail spool. I've attached a run report. There are about 1.4M files with a compressed size of 4G. I get much better throughput (e.g., 2,000KB/s vs 86KB/s for this job!) with other

Re: [Bacula-users] painfully slow backups

2007-10-05 Thread Ross Boylan
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 18:57 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote: On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Ross Boylan wrote: I've been having really slow backups (13 hours) when I backup a large mail spool. I've attached a run report. There are about 1.4M files with a compressed size of 4G. I get much better

Re: [Bacula-users] painfully slow backups

2007-10-04 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 04.10.2007 00:30,, Ross Boylan wrote:: On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 23:19 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hello, 30.09.2007 01:36,, Ross Boylan wrote:: On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 13:15 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 08:46 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hello, 27.09.2007 22:47,, Ross

Re: [Bacula-users] painfully slow backups

2007-10-03 Thread Ross Boylan
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 23:19 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hello, 30.09.2007 01:36,, Ross Boylan wrote:: On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 13:15 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 08:46 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hello, 27.09.2007 22:47,, Ross Boylan wrote:: On Thu, 2007-09-27 at

Re: [Bacula-users] painfully slow backups

2007-09-30 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, 30.09.2007 01:36,, Ross Boylan wrote:: On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 13:15 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 08:46 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hello, 27.09.2007 22:47,, Ross Boylan wrote:: On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 09:19 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, 27.09.2007 01:17,, Ross

Re: [Bacula-users] painfully slow backups

2007-09-29 Thread Ross Boylan
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 08:46 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hello, 27.09.2007 22:47,, Ross Boylan wrote:: On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 09:19 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, 27.09.2007 01:17,, Ross Boylan wrote:: I've been having really slow backups (13 hours) when I backup a large mail spool.

Re: [Bacula-users] painfully slow backups

2007-09-29 Thread Ross Boylan
On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 13:15 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 08:46 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hello, 27.09.2007 22:47,, Ross Boylan wrote:: On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 09:19 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, 27.09.2007 01:17,, Ross Boylan wrote:: I've been having

Re: [Bacula-users] painfully slow backups

2007-09-28 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, 27.09.2007 22:47,, Ross Boylan wrote:: On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 09:19 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, 27.09.2007 01:17,, Ross Boylan wrote:: I've been having really slow backups (13 hours) when I backup a large mail spool. I've attached a run report. There are about 1.4M files with a

Re: [Bacula-users] painfully slow backups

2007-09-27 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 27.09.2007 01:17,, Ross Boylan wrote:: I've been having really slow backups (13 hours) when I backup a large mail spool. I've attached a run report. There are about 1.4M files with a compressed size of 4G. I get much better throughput (e.g., 2,000KB/s vs 86KB/s for this job!) with

Re: [Bacula-users] painfully slow backups

2007-09-27 Thread Ross Boylan
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 21:26 -0500, Drew Bentley wrote: On 9/26/07, Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been having really slow backups (13 hours) when I backup a large mail spool. I've attached a run report. There are about 1.4M files with a compressed size of 4G. I get much better

Re: [Bacula-users] painfully slow backups

2007-09-27 Thread Ross Boylan
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 09:19 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, 27.09.2007 01:17,, Ross Boylan wrote:: I've been having really slow backups (13 hours) when I backup a large mail spool. I've attached a run report. There are about 1.4M files with a compressed size of 4G. I get much better

[Bacula-users] painfully slow backups

2007-09-26 Thread Ross Boylan
I've been having really slow backups (13 hours) when I backup a large mail spool. I've attached a run report. There are about 1.4M files with a compressed size of 4G. I get much better throughput (e.g., 2,000KB/s vs 86KB/s for this job!) with other jobs. First, does it sound as if something is

Re: [Bacula-users] painfully slow backups

2007-09-26 Thread Drew Bentley
On 9/26/07, Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been having really slow backups (13 hours) when I backup a large mail spool. I've attached a run report. There are about 1.4M files with a compressed size of 4G. I get much better throughput (e.g., 2,000KB/s vs 86KB/s for this job!) with