Hi,
07.10.2007 20:19,, Ross Boylan wrote::
A full backup of the offending directory just ran in 7 hrs, 17 min with
a rate of 160KB/s (1,416,688 files, 4.4GB SD bytes written). This is
slightly more files and bytes than last month.
This is almost twice as fast as previous performance (13
A full backup of the offending directory just ran in 7 hrs, 17 min with
a rate of 160KB/s (1,416,688 files, 4.4GB SD bytes written). This is
slightly more files and bytes than last month.
This is almost twice as fast as previous performance (13 hrs, 14 min and
a rate of 86KB/s). This suggests
Here are the results after moving the postgres database to another disk:
Initial jobs were like the ones at the end of my earlier report,
involving the directories with c 4,000 files.
93 seconds first try (277kb/s)
20 seconds 2nd try (1679kb/s)
Then I switched to the one I used at the beginning
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Ross Boylan wrote:
I've been having really slow backups (13 hours) when I backup a large
mail spool. I've attached a run report. There are about 1.4M files
with a compressed size of 4G. I get much better throughput (e.g.,
2,000KB/s vs 86KB/s for this job!) with other
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 18:57 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Ross Boylan wrote:
I've been having really slow backups (13 hours) when I backup a large
mail spool. I've attached a run report. There are about 1.4M files
with a compressed size of 4G. I get much better
Hi,
04.10.2007 00:30,, Ross Boylan wrote::
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 23:19 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
30.09.2007 01:36,, Ross Boylan wrote::
On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 13:15 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 08:46 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
27.09.2007 22:47,, Ross
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 23:19 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
30.09.2007 01:36,, Ross Boylan wrote::
On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 13:15 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 08:46 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
27.09.2007 22:47,, Ross Boylan wrote::
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at
Hello,
30.09.2007 01:36,, Ross Boylan wrote::
On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 13:15 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 08:46 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
27.09.2007 22:47,, Ross Boylan wrote::
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 09:19 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
27.09.2007 01:17,, Ross
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 08:46 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
27.09.2007 22:47,, Ross Boylan wrote::
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 09:19 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
27.09.2007 01:17,, Ross Boylan wrote::
I've been having really slow backups (13 hours) when I backup a large
mail spool.
On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 13:15 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 08:46 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
27.09.2007 22:47,, Ross Boylan wrote::
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 09:19 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
27.09.2007 01:17,, Ross Boylan wrote::
I've been having
Hello,
27.09.2007 22:47,, Ross Boylan wrote::
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 09:19 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
27.09.2007 01:17,, Ross Boylan wrote::
I've been having really slow backups (13 hours) when I backup a large
mail spool. I've attached a run report. There are about 1.4M files
with a
Hi,
27.09.2007 01:17,, Ross Boylan wrote::
I've been having really slow backups (13 hours) when I backup a large
mail spool. I've attached a run report. There are about 1.4M files
with a compressed size of 4G. I get much better throughput (e.g.,
2,000KB/s vs 86KB/s for this job!) with
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 21:26 -0500, Drew Bentley wrote:
On 9/26/07, Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been having really slow backups (13 hours) when I backup a large
mail spool. I've attached a run report. There are about 1.4M files
with a compressed size of 4G. I get much better
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 09:19 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
27.09.2007 01:17,, Ross Boylan wrote::
I've been having really slow backups (13 hours) when I backup a large
mail spool. I've attached a run report. There are about 1.4M files
with a compressed size of 4G. I get much better
I've been having really slow backups (13 hours) when I backup a large
mail spool. I've attached a run report. There are about 1.4M files
with a compressed size of 4G. I get much better throughput (e.g.,
2,000KB/s vs 86KB/s for this job!) with other jobs.
First, does it sound as if something is
On 9/26/07, Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been having really slow backups (13 hours) when I backup a large
mail spool. I've attached a run report. There are about 1.4M files
with a compressed size of 4G. I get much better throughput (e.g.,
2,000KB/s vs 86KB/s for this job!) with
16 matches
Mail list logo