Re: [Bacula-users] sanity check on a distributed local backup strategy?

2011-02-26 Thread Dan Langille
On 2/25/2011 11:15 PM, Mehma Sarja wrote: On 2/25/11 2:50 PM, dev001 wrote: Sanity check? It is an excellent idea and efficient usage of resources. I have a laptop user who rarely gets backed up - a local storage solution would be ideal for delayed copying. Backups are initiated by the

Re: [Bacula-users] sanity check on a distributed local backup strategy?

2011-02-26 Thread Mehma Sarja
On 2/26/11 1:19 PM, Dan Langille wrote: On 2/25/2011 11:15 PM, Mehma Sarja wrote: On 2/25/11 2:50 PM, dev001 wrote: Sanity check? It is an excellent idea and efficient usage of resources. I have a snip If you have no connectivity to the Dir, backups will not be run. Oopsie, looks like that

[Bacula-users] sanity check on a distributed local backup strategy?

2011-02-25 Thread dev001
hi, to date, my backup strategy across many, geo-distributed desktops (all Linux, fwiw) has been the usual hodge-podge of local remote rsync scripts, gui-driven LuckyBackup runs, etc. having grown organically, it's now an unweildly mess. Bacula's my primary 'contender' for a solution. i've