Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question

2010-05-18 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 05/18/10 10:37, Joseph Spenner wrote: > --- On Mon, 5/17/10, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> As previously mentioned, staggering backups on your clients is >> fairly easy. A six-day backup cycle is *unusual*, because it >> doesn't fit neatly into either weekly or monthly schedules, and >> because w

Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question

2010-05-18 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 05/18/10 13:45, Joseph Spenner wrote: > --- On Tue, 5/18/10, Joseph Spenner wrote: > > >> Ok, I do have a spare disk in my system I can use for the >> 7th day. So, let's change the schedule such that I >> have 3 sets of "7 disks", for a total of 21 disks. >> Perhaps this will simplify the s

Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question

2010-05-18 Thread Joseph Spenner
--- On Tue, 5/18/10, Joseph Spenner wrote: > Ok, I do have a spare disk in my system I can use for the > 7th day.  So, let's change the schedule such that I > have 3 sets of "7 disks", for a total of 21 disks.  > Perhaps this will simplify the scheduling.  I still > wish to have a full backup fo

Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question

2010-05-18 Thread Joseph Spenner
--- On Mon, 5/17/10, Phil Stracchino wrote: > > As previously mentioned, staggering backups on your clients > is fairly > easy.  A six-day backup cycle is *unusual*, because it > doesn't fit > neatly into either weekly or monthly schedules, and because > we don't > have an ideal calendar divide

Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question

2010-05-17 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 05/17/10 17:53, Joseph Spenner wrote: > Ok, it's not quite THAT bad! :) OK, I possibly exaggerated a little for effect. :) The one time I tried to get AMANDA set up, I really couldn't get anywhere with it, because it seemed it was designed for "tell it what to back up how often and what res

Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question

2010-05-17 Thread Joseph Spenner
--- On Mon, 5/17/10, Phil Stracchino wrote: > > AMANDA has a totally different approach to backup > scheduling than > Bacula.  And I'll come right out and say that AMANDA's > approach makes my > brain hurt.  It's sort of like having a checkbook that > promises it'll be > balanced three times a m

Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question

2010-05-17 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 05/17/10 16:11, Joseph Spenner wrote: > --- On Mon, 5/17/10, John Drescher wrote: >>> How would I configure such that it runs a full backup >> every 6 "runs"? >> >> Make the full backup weekly in the schedule instead of >> monthly. >> >>> By default, how many incrementals does it run before a >

Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question

2010-05-17 Thread Joseph Spenner
--- On Mon, 5/17/10, John Drescher wrote: > > How would I configure such that it runs a full backup > every 6 "runs"? > > Make the full backup weekly in the schedule instead of > monthly. > > > By default, how many incrementals does it run before a > full backup is run? > > This is set by you

Re: [Bacula-users] Scheduling configuration question

2010-05-17 Thread John Drescher
> My goal is to have the schedule such that there is always a FULL backup of > every host on each set of disks.  I'm not very clear of the syntax of the > config file though.  I currently have the default which all my clients are > currently using: > > Schedule { >  Name = "WeeklyCycle" >  Run =