--- On Mon, 5/17/10, Phil Stracchino ala...@metrocast.net wrote:
As previously mentioned, staggering backups on your clients
is fairly
easy. A six-day backup cycle is *unusual*, because it
doesn't fit
neatly into either weekly or monthly schedules, and because
we don't
have an ideal
--- On Tue, 5/18/10, Joseph Spenner joseph85...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ok, I do have a spare disk in my system I can use for the
7th day. So, let's change the schedule such that I
have 3 sets of 7 disks, for a total of 21 disks.
Perhaps this will simplify the scheduling. I still
wish to have a
On 05/18/10 13:45, Joseph Spenner wrote:
--- On Tue, 5/18/10, Joseph Spenner joseph85...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ok, I do have a spare disk in my system I can use for the
7th day. So, let's change the schedule such that I
have 3 sets of 7 disks, for a total of 21 disks.
Perhaps this will
On 05/18/10 10:37, Joseph Spenner wrote:
--- On Mon, 5/17/10, Phil Stracchino ala...@metrocast.net wrote:
As previously mentioned, staggering backups on your clients is
fairly easy. A six-day backup cycle is *unusual*, because it
doesn't fit neatly into either weekly or monthly schedules,
My goal is to have the schedule such that there is always a FULL backup of
every host on each set of disks. I'm not very clear of the syntax of the
config file though. I currently have the default which all my clients are
currently using:
Schedule {
Name = WeeklyCycle
Run = Full 1st
--- On Mon, 5/17/10, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
How would I configure such that it runs a full backup
every 6 runs?
Make the full backup weekly in the schedule instead of
monthly.
By default, how many incrementals does it run before a
full backup is run?
This is set
On 05/17/10 16:11, Joseph Spenner wrote:
--- On Mon, 5/17/10, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
How would I configure such that it runs a full backup
every 6 runs?
Make the full backup weekly in the schedule instead of
monthly.
By default, how many incrementals does it run before a
--- On Mon, 5/17/10, Phil Stracchino ala...@metrocast.net wrote:
AMANDA has a totally different approach to backup
scheduling than
Bacula. And I'll come right out and say that AMANDA's
approach makes my
brain hurt. It's sort of like having a checkbook that
promises it'll be
balanced
On 05/17/10 17:53, Joseph Spenner wrote:
Ok, it's not quite THAT bad! :)
OK, I possibly exaggerated a little for effect. :) The one time I
tried to get AMANDA set up, I really couldn't get anywhere with it,
because it seemed it was designed for tell it what to back up how often
and what
