On Sat, 7 May 2005, John Hayden wrote:
Except, the same code on another RH9 system only spawns 1 instance
and on this system all 3 instances are listening on port 9102. It would seem
to me that multiple instances should be listening on different ports. I'm
fairly certain there should only be
Quoting Alan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, 7 May 2005, John Hayden wrote:
[snip]
Does pstree show them chained or separate?
|-bacula-fd---bacula-fd---bacula-fd
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your
It shows then as seperate. I did a make unintsall, make distclean,
wiped out config files and var/bacula/* and started all over and still
got the same results with 1.36-3. I liedearlier. My other system is
running RH9 but not the same bacula codebase. So, I reverted to 1.34
and that seems to
Jeff,
Except, the same code on another RH9 system only spawns 1 instance and
on this system all 3 instances are listening on port 9102. It would
seem to me that multiple instances should be listening on different
ports. I'm fairly certain there should only be on instance of bacula-fd
starting
On Sat, 7 May 2005 12:02:40 -0400, John Hayden [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
John Except, the same code on another RH9 system only spawns 1
instance and
John on this system all 3 instances are listening on port 9102. It would
John seem to me that multiple instances should be listening
Quoting John Hayden [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello everyone,
I have a wierd problem. I'm installing bacula (client only) on a
RedHat 9 system. I have tried this both as a source compile and a
pre-compiled rpm. When I start the client, I get 3 instances of
bacula-fd running. Would
