Arno Lehmann schrieb:
Here my feature request for a cleaning enhacement:
If you really want that to be a feature request you should rewrite it
into the format suggested by Kern. You can find that on the project web
site, I believe.
1. It should be possible to declare for one or more
Hi,
The delete command can have... unwanted side-effects, too.
Yes,
I've found that the commands in bconsole are a little bit more
clement than they should.
For example I can have the following line:
*list volumes pool=Scratch
All ok the volumes in pool Scratch are shown.
*list volumes
I'm starting to think about expanding my use of bacula. Currently
I rsync other boxes to my backup box, then on the backup box I use
bacula to write to tapes. Has anyone thought about or is anyone using
bacula's volume-on-disk abilities as a VTL?
Mike
Hello,
Debian packages of Bacula 2.0.2 have been uploaded to Debian
experimental and should hit your local mirror within 24 hours.
These packages will eventually be uploaded to unstable when I feel that
they're solid enough to do so. (Also we must wait a bit due to an
unrelated propogation to
Howdy,
I'm backing up my first machine using Bacula.
Bacula-dir, bacula-sd and bacula-fd are all on this same computer, Linux
Redhat FC6 box backing up to a locally connected 500GB USB 2.0 hard drive.
So, everything is local.
The system is an AMD Athlon XP 1900+ with 512 MB's of DDR and
Hi,
On 2/24/2007 11:43 AM, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
Arno Lehmann schrieb:
Here my feature request for a cleaning enhacement:
If you really want that to be a feature request you should rewrite it
into the format suggested by Kern. You can find that on the project web
site, I believe.
1. It
Hi,
On 2/24/2007 5:31 PM, Mike Hanby wrote:
...
Bacula-dir, bacula-sd and bacula-fd are all on this same computer, Linux
Redhat FC6 box backing up to a locally connected 500GB USB 2.0 hard
drive. So, everything is local.
...
It is now 10:00, 16.5 hours later and 57GB's have been backed up.
John Goerzen napisał(a):
Hello,
Debian packages of Bacula 2.0.2 have been uploaded to Debian
experimental and should hit your local mirror within 24 hours.
[...]
Beautiful. Do packages include fixed[1] version of restore.c?
[1] -
I found the reason for that error in the source code:
in file dev.c at line 385 bacula tries to rewind the fifo
Thanks, it's ok in 2.0.x and 2.1.x now.
But now I face the next problem. Restore by the fifo device doesn't work. I
can restore when I use a file device. Therefore I backup
Hi list,
firstofall, I'm just asking here for I'm not aware of a list dealing
with bweb yet, and secondly most/all of it's users are going to read
it here anyway.
i'm currently setting up mysql permissions for bacula and bweb - does
anyone know if bweb only needs readonly permissions and does
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:40:30PM +0100, Lech Karol Paw??aszek wrote:
Debian packages of Bacula 2.0.2 have been uploaded to Debian
experimental and should hit your local mirror within 24 hours.
[...]
Beautiful. Do packages include fixed[1] version of restore.c?
[1] -
We take back-ups every night at 2 o'clock of a series of boxes of which some may
not be at the office at that time because they are out in the field (notebooks).
Is there a way to automatically skip the back-up job if there is no route to
host? At the moment the failing back-up job is retried 6
Does anyone know if bacula keeps track of tape soft errors? (Soft errors
being correctable errors that were corrected by the tape drive
hardware.)
I like to use the number of soft errors as an early warning indicator as
to tape failure.
I am currently using Veritas Backup Exec and it tracks
resent, to bacula-users
On 24 Feb 2007 at 17:58, Rex Wheeler wrote:
Does anyone know if bacula keeps track of tape soft errors? (Soft errors
being correctable errors that were corrected by the tape drive
hardware.)
Bacula does not keep track of this.
I like to use the number of soft errors
On 25 Feb 2007 at 3:33, Florian Heigl wrote:
Just a silent heads up, if I may...
Umm, how is this silent? ;)
I never noticed bacula didn't track media errors, but this *is* a missing
feature - the backup tool is expected to have error counters for tape devices
and media, both will fail
On February 24, 2007 6:41 PM Dan Langille wrote:
On 24 Feb 2007 at 17:58, Rex Wheeler wrote:
Does anyone know if bacula keeps track of tape soft errors? (Soft
errors
being correctable errors that were corrected by the tape drive
hardware.)
Bacula does not keep track of this.
Not
16 matches
Mail list logo
