Hi
I'm sure many people using disk-based storage find that, like me, they
have three pools defined for almost every job or at least class of job,
like this:
Pool {
Name = SystemFullPool
Storage = SystemStorage
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = yes
AutoPrune = yes
Volume Retention = 2
[initially posted to the wrong address, sorry if it reaches you anyway]
Hi all
I'm a rather happy Bacula user and have been following the lists quietly
for a while. I'm piping up with some ideas and comments based on using
Bacula for a couple of years for my work's backup needs.
During my own
Hi,
I have 25 full jobs that run over the weekend, but I want to only allow
10 to run at any one time.
Initially I gave the jobs priorities, but this didn't work as some jobs
take almost the entire weekend to finish to the lower priority jobs were
not starting until Monday morning. So what I
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 01:20:49PM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
I'm having problems with our SD and tapes being locked in the
drive occasionally.
How does it manifest exactly ? bconsole umount command returns error,
or remains in some state (check with status storage) ? Which state
and/or error
Hi,
First of all - I agree that the volume handling on disks is one of bacula's two
weakest points. Whether a dedicated disk-based SD would actually solve anything
is an open question in my mind, though, because most of the problems come from
the overall architecture, and that's largely baked
I second this idea. Maybe you could turn it into a feature request (see the Web
site for instructions on how to do that).
Your idea would solve very nicely solve one really ugly problem: when manually
running a backup job, the job may end up in the wrong pool - even if you
actually remembered
Hello,
I'm using bacula-5.0.1.
I have a 2.33GHz CPU with 2G of RAM.
I am using MySQL.
I had a VirtualFull scheduled for my client.
My log says the following:
Apr 4 18:56:02 Start Virtual Backup JobId 56,
Job=Linux:cvs.2010-04-04_18.56.00_03
Apr 4 18:56:02 This Job is not an Accurate backup
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 02:36:38PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
I'm sure many people using disk-based storage find that, like me, they
have three pools defined for almost every job or at least class of job,
like this:
You could use standard include (@) feature of bacula configuration
files, for
Kevin Keane wrote:
Hi,
First of all - I agree that the volume handling on disks is one of bacula's
two weakest points. Whether a dedicated disk-based SD would actually solve
anything is an open question in my mind, though, because most of the problems
come from the overall architecture,
On 04/06/10 02:37, Craig Ringer wrote:
Is this insane? Or a viable approach to tackling some of the
complexities of faking tape backup on disk as Bacula currently tries to do?
Well, just off the top of my head, the first thing that comes to mind is
that the only ways such a scheme is not going
On 04/06/10 02:36, Craig Ringer wrote:
where they're all pretty repetitive except for the retention periods and
volume names. I'm wondering if it'd be worth thinking about extending
the director's pool config with a shorthand to allow easier
configuration of full/diff/incr pool sets. Here, the
On 04/06/10 06:00, Kevin Keane wrote:
Your idea would solve very nicely solve one really ugly problem: when
manually running a backup job, the job may end up in the wrong pool -
even if you actually remembered to select the correct one. For
instance, let's say that the most recent Differential
On Tuesday 06 April 2010 13:46:33 Craig Ringer wrote:
I guess if disk-based Devices could be opened multiple times with
different volumes, there'd be no real need for the sd to auto-define
devices on demand.
There are still a few things that don't work well with bacula. Concurrency
is one
On 04/06/10 05:51, Kevin Keane wrote:
There are still a few things that don't work well with bacula.
Concurrency is one - it should really be possible to open more than
one file-based volume at the same time. Automatically deleting
file-based volumes from disk is another (I think the new 5.x
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:59:49PM +0200, Matija Nalis wrote:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 11:13:44AM +0100, Graham Keeling wrote:
I'm using bacula-5.0.1.
At about Apr 6 10:00, I logged into mysql, and ran 'show full processlist;',
which gave the following.
| 3033 | root | localhost |
On 04/ 6/10 02:42 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 04/06/10 02:37, Craig Ringer wrote:
Is this insane? Or a viable approach to tackling some of the
complexities of faking tape backup on disk as Bacula currently tries to do?
Well, just off the top of my head, the first thing that comes to mind is
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Matija Nalis
mnalis+bac...@carnet.hrmnalis%2bbac...@carnet.hr
wrote:
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 01:20:49PM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
I'm having problems with our SD and tapes being locked in the
drive occasionally.
How does it manifest exactly ? bconsole
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Matija Nalis
mnalis+bac...@carnet.hrmnalis%2bbac...@carnet.hr
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:36:59AM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Matija Nalis
mnalis+bac...@carnet.hrmnalis%2bbac...@carnet.hr
I think you need to set
Hello Graham,
Graham Keeling wrote:
Hello,
I'm using bacula-5.0.1.
I have a 2.33GHz CPU with 2G of RAM.
I am using MySQL.
I had a VirtualFull scheduled for my client.
My log says the following:
Apr 4 18:56:02 Start Virtual Backup JobId 56,
Job=Linux:cvs.2010-04-04_18.56.00_03
On 4/6/2010 8:42 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 04/06/10 02:37, Craig Ringer wrote:
Is this insane? Or a viable approach to tackling some of the
complexities of faking tape backup on disk as Bacula currently tries to do?
Well, just off the top of my head, the first thing that comes
On 04/06/10 12:06, Josh Fisher wrote:
On 4/6/2010 8:42 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 04/06/10 02:37, Craig Ringer wrote:
Well, just off the top of my head, the first thing that comes to mind is
that the only ways such a scheme is not going to result in massive disk
fragmentation are:
(a)
On 04/ 6/10 06:28 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 04/06/10 12:06, Josh Fisher wrote:
On 4/6/2010 8:42 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 04/06/10 02:37, Craig Ringer wrote:
Well, just off the top of my head, the first thing that comes to mind is
that the only ways such a scheme is not going to
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010 14:44:15 + (UTC), jcd95 said:
OK.
The problem come from :
depkgs-qt/qt4/bin/pkg-config which return nothing.
depkgs-qt/qt4/bin/pkg-config is an empty shell file.
In ./configure for the moment have remplace by hard coding
$PKGCONFIG by /usr/bin/pkg-config
Now I
On 04/06/10 14:18, Henrik Johansen wrote:
[...] when ZFS flushes its transaction groups to spinning rust.
heh. :)
--
Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
ala...@caerllewys.net ala...@metrocast.net p...@co.ordinate.org
Renaissance Man, Unix
-Original Message-
From: Phil Stracchino [mailto:ala...@metrocast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 6:05 AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Idea/suggestion for dedicated disk-based sd
On 04/06/10 05:51, Kevin Keane wrote:
There are still a few
I would NOT recommend the AddLevelSuffix directive - that is too
inflexible, as well as unnecessary. You can simply include ${Level}
in your LabelFormat directive. Note that if you include a variable in
the label format, Bacula will no longer automatically append the
volume ID.
I installed 5.0.1 using this documentation:
http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg40959.html
The BAT connected to Bacula but the Director Status is not working :(
The test backup is still not working
Here is all the status:
status
Select daemon type for
On 04/06/10 17:17, Kevin Keane wrote:
Automatic volume deletion can be handled fairly simply using an
admin job that runs a script to delete expired volumes; I've
attached mine as an example.
I know, that's what I've been doing. But it is a really ugly hack:
for such a routine operation,
On 03/29/2010 09:59 AM, Roland Roberts wrote:
I am routinely getting this after an upgrade of my server from Fedora 8 to
Fedora 12 so it is now running Bacula 3.0.3
29-Mar 04:03 archos-dir: BackupCatalog.2010-03-29_01.05.05 Fatal error: File daemon on
archos.rlent.pnet:9102 rejected Hello
On 04/06/10 17:26, Kevin Keane wrote:
I would NOT recommend the AddLevelSuffix directive - that is too
inflexible, as well as unnecessary. You can simply include
${Level} in your LabelFormat directive. Note that if you include
a variable in the label format, Bacula will no longer
Device status:
Device FileStorage (/bacula) is not open.
Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for:
Pool: File
Media type: File
There are no volumes in your File pool that bacula can use. Either
auto labeling is not fully enabled or all volumes are
On 04/06/10 17:28, Kevin Keane wrote:
From: Phil Stracchino [mailto:ala...@metrocast.net]
Actually, this is a problem which has largely been fixed in
Bacula-3 and later, by changing the way overrides work.
Really? I see this problem in bacula 3.0.3 all the time. Maybe I need
to change
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Craig Ringer
cr...@postnewspapers.com.au wrote:
[snip]
Is this insane? Or a viable approach to tackling some of the
complexities of faking tape backup on disk as Bacula currently tries to do?
I love Bacula and have been working hard to promote it to people I
Hey guys,
I'm still having trouble controlling which volume bacula chooses to
write to when it has plenty of volumes set to 'append'. I *need* bacula
to only select a volume to append to that has InChanger=1. I kinda
thought that it would do this automatically, at least from what I've
read,
Thanks for you help. I made a new VM of Ubuntu and followed the steps I listed
and then everything works fine now. The problem seems it was with the
Postgresql, so I read on a different forum.
Anyways, I got Bacula Web Working and the default jobs run, too. The Director
Status are still not
On 04/06/10 22:26, ikkysleepy wrote:
Hey, can you tell me if this is possible to search for particular
files in the backup?
Using what? Do you mean select specific files for restore, or do you
mean you want to search backed-up data for a specific file without
knowing beforehand where it was
Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 04/06/10 17:28, Kevin Keane wrote:
From: Phil Stracchino [mailto:ala...@metrocast.net]
Actually, this is a problem which has largely been fixed in
Bacula-3 and later, by changing the way overrides work.
Really? I see this problem in bacula 3.0.3 all the time. Maybe
Phil Stracchino wrote:
It is possible right now to open more than one file-based volume at a
time.
You simply need to define multiple storage devices under the same
storage daemon; each device can have one volume open at a time.
Yep. My suggestion was merely a way around the inconvenience
Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 04/06/10 02:37, Craig Ringer wrote:
Is this insane? Or a viable approach to tackling some of the
complexities of faking tape backup on disk as Bacula currently tries to do?
Well, just off the top of my head, the first thing that comes to mind is
that the only ways
39 matches
Mail list logo
