[Bacula-users] Remote backup, Failed to connect to Storage daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
i got my local (home) backups going alright with TLS and everything, but
now i'm running into issues getting my remote work computers
communicating 100%.
to reiterate, i've currently got two systems at home, home1 and home2,
and two at work, work1 and work2. the director and sd are both running
on home1, and i've fd's setup on home1, home2, and now work1.
my home1-dir - work1-fd TLS communication is OK, as i can query work1-fd
through bconsole running on home1. i'm running into a problem when i
try to run the backup, and the communication between work1-fd and
home1-sd is botched. i get this error:
24-Jul 23:40 home1-dir JobId 33: No prior Full backup Job record found.
24-Jul 23:40 home1-dir JobId 33: No prior or suitable Full backup found
in catalog. Doing FULL backup.
24-Jul 23:40 home1-dir JobId 33: Start Backup JobId 33,
Job=work1.2011-07-24_23.40.53_03
24-Jul 23:40 home1-dir JobId 33: Using Device FileStorage
24-Jul 23:41 work1-fd JobId 33: Fatal error: Failed to connect to
Storage daemon: home1.local:9103
24-Jul 23:41 home1-dir JobId 33: Fatal error: Bad response to Storage
command: wanted 2000 OK storage
, got 2902 Bad storage
it seems clear to me my remote work1 computer is trying to connect to a
non-local address (home1.local:9103). currently this is what i have in
my dir.conf for the storage:
Storage {
Name = File
Address = home1.local
SDPort = 9103
Password = X
Device = FileStorage
Media Type = File
TLS Enable = yes
TLS Require = yes
TLS CA Certificate File = /etc/bacula/certs/myca.crt
TLS Certificate = /etc/bacula/certs/home1.crt
TLS Key = /etc/bacula/certs/home1.key
}
i thought it would be straightforward to just define another Storage
resource but instead using my home's dyndns address, with a new TLS cert
with the CN matching the dyndns address:
Storage {
Name = RemoteFile
Address = home.dyndns.org
SDPort = 9103
Password = X
Device = FileStorage
Media Type = File
TLS Enable = yes
TLS Require = yes
TLS CA Certificate File = /etc/bacula/certs/myca.crt
TLS Certificate = /etc/bacula/certs/home.dyndns.org.crt
TLS Key = /etc/bacula/certs/home.dyndns.org.key
}
then i updated the Job resource for work1-fd to use `Storage =
RemoteFile`, restarted the services on both machines, and now i'm
getting a damned TLS error!
25-Jul 00:29 home1-dir JobId 36: No prior Full backup Job record found.
25-Jul 00:29 home1-dir JobId 36: No prior or suitable Full backup found
in catalog. Doing FULL backup.
25-Jul 00:29 home1-dir JobId 36: Start Backup JobId 36,
Job=work1.2011-07-25_00.29.34_06
25-Jul 00:29 home1-dir JobId 36: Fatal error: TLS negotiation failed
with SD at home.dyndns.org:9103
25-Jul 00:29 home1-dir JobId 36: Fatal error: bnet.c:306 TLS host
certificate verification failed. Host name home.dyndns.org did not
match presented certificate
i'm certain though that i created the certificate with a CN of
home.dyndns.org.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iEYEAREIAAYFAk4tJAUACgkQXhfCJNu98qD1FQCg6j/mmgUpruwvvORk7VsUvMpU
0IYAoO39aYu1UINIRoqxYIfDbTG2rK+6
=vliF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Storage Efficiency Calculator
This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that
has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage-
ments, worldwide. Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to
the right place. Try It Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Virtual diff instead of full
Hi! Thanks for the tip and sorry for the delay in feedback. I turned on logging and I have tried to sift through to find out where it goes wrong... I made a new Differential backup and I tried to make a new VirtualFull but with the same result. According to the logs it makes a query containing the four JobIds needed to complete a virtual full (42420,43284,43296,43332) SELECT Path.Path, Filename.Name, Temp.FileIndex, Temp.JobId, LStat, MD5 FROM ( SELECT FileId, Job.JobId AS JobId, FileIndex, File.PathId AS PathId, File.FilenameId AS FilenameId, LStat, MD5 FROM Job, File, ( SELECT MAX(JobTDate) AS JobTDate, PathId, FilenameId FROM ( SELECT JobTDate, PathId, FilenameId FROM File JOIN Job USING (JobId) WHERE File.JobId IN (42420,43284,43296,43332) UNION ALL SELECT JobTDate, PathId, FilenameId FROM BaseFiles JOIN File USING (FileId) JOIN Job ON(BaseJobId = Job.JobId) WHERE BaseFiles.JobId IN (42420,43284,43296,43332) ) AS tmp GROUP BY PathId, FilenameId ) AS T1 WHERE (Job.JobId IN ( SELECT DISTINCT BaseJobId FROM BaseFiles WHERE JobId IN (42420,43284,43296,43332)) OR Job.JobId IN (42420,43284,43296,43332)) AND T1.JobTDate = Job.JobTDate AND Job.JobId = File.JobId AND T1.PathId = File.PathId AND T1.FilenameId = File.FilenameId ) AS Temp JOIN Filename ON (Filename.FilenameId = Temp.FilenameId) JOIN Path ON (Path.PathId = Temp.PathId) WHERE FileIndex 0 ORDER BY Temp.JobId, FileIndex ASC; If I query the database to make sure that this is the four jobbs needed I get the right result: mysql select Job, Type, Level, ClientId, JobStatus from Job where JobId = 42420 or JobId = 43284 or JobId = 43296 or JobId = 43332; ++--+---+--+---+ | Job| Type | Level | ClientId | JobStatus | ++--+---+--+---+ | edstrom.2010-09-17_23.55.00_07 | B| F |8 | T | | edstrom.2011-07-22_22.42.11_23 | B| D |8 | T | | edstrom.2011-07-23_22.04.00_37 | B| I |8 | T | | edstrom.2011-07-24_22.04.00_19 | B| I |8 | T | ++--+---+--+---+ 4 rows in set (0.00 sec) After this I do not get another referens to the Fulljob not by JobId or by name but the Diffjob is referenced both by Id and by name. I'm not really sure where to go from here so if anyone has an Ideas I am willing to try it. /marcus -- - Ursprungligt meddelande - Från: James Harper james.har...@bendigoit.com.au Till: Marcus Hallberg mar...@wimlet.se, Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Skickat: tisdag, 12 jul 2011 13:37:41 Ämne: RE: [Bacula-users] Virtual diff instead of full Hi! I have problem with Virtual full on one set of backups where it does not give me a virtual full but a virtual diff instead. The last fullbackup was about 125 GB and an new estimate says that a new full would be about 200 GB. When I ask i to produce a new VirtualFull it starts reading from the last Diff and gives me a virtual full file of about 50 GB wich is about the size of my diffs. Does anyone have any pointers they would be greatly appressiated If you want to get your hands dirty and like sifting through logfiles you can turn on mysql logging (assuming you are using mysql) and have a look at what queries are used to determine the volumes that make up the virtualfull. Regular bacula debug logging may help too. James -- Storage Efficiency Calculator This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage- ments, worldwide. Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to the right place. Try It Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Performance
Hello Guys... This weekend I did a backup with a size of 41.92 GB that took 1 hour and 24 minutes with a rate of 8.27 MB/s. My Bacula Server is installed in a IBM server connected in a Tape Drive LTO4 (120 MB/s) via SAS connection (3 Gb/s). I'm using Encryption and Compression Gzip6. I think that this rate (8.27 MB/s) is too much slow for such configuration. I'd like to know how much rate you are getting using Encryption and Compression and what I suppose to do to increase the Bacula's performance. Thanks Rickifer Barros. -- Storage Efficiency Calculator This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage- ments, worldwide. Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to the right place. Try It Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Performance
I forgot to say that the files I backed up are locally in the Bacula Server. On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Rickifer Barros rickiferbar...@gmail.comwrote: Hello Guys... This weekend I did a backup with a size of 41.92 GB that took 1 hour and 24 minutes with a rate of 8.27 MB/s. My Bacula Server is installed in a IBM server connected in a Tape Drive LTO4 (120 MB/s) via SAS connection (3 Gb/s). I'm using Encryption and Compression Gzip6. I think that this rate (8.27 MB/s) is too much slow for such configuration. I'd like to know how much rate you are getting using Encryption and Compression and what I suppose to do to increase the Bacula's performance. Thanks Rickifer Barros. -- Storage Efficiency Calculator This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage- ments, worldwide. Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to the right place. Try It Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Performance
2011/7/25 Rickifer Barros rickiferbar...@gmail.com: Hello Guys... This weekend I did a backup with a size of 41.92 GB that took 1 hour and 24 minutes with a rate of 8.27 MB/s. My Bacula Server is installed in a IBM server connected in a Tape Drive LTO4 (120 MB/s) via SAS connection (3 Gb/s). I'm using Encryption and Compression Gzip6. Disable software compression. The tape drive will compress much faster than the client. John -- Storage Efficiency Calculator This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage- ments, worldwide. Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to the right place. Try It Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Performance
I did this beforebut, I didn't know how check in Debian if it really is being compressed by the tape drive. The only thing that I got was the bacula information about the SD and FD Written and the mt command in Linux don't say me the real data size of the volume, so I chose to trust on the software compression...YEAH I'm noob on Tape manipulation... :t On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:57 AM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.comwrote: 2011/7/25 Rickifer Barros rickiferbar...@gmail.com: Hello Guys... This weekend I did a backup with a size of 41.92 GB that took 1 hour and 24 minutes with a rate of 8.27 MB/s. My Bacula Server is installed in a IBM server connected in a Tape Drive LTO4 (120 MB/s) via SAS connection (3 Gb/s). I'm using Encryption and Compression Gzip6. Disable software compression. The tape drive will compress much faster than the client. John -- Storage Efficiency Calculator This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage- ments, worldwide. Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to the right place. Try It Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Performance
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Rickifer Barros rickiferbar...@gmail.com wrote: I did this beforebut, I didn't know how check in Debian if it really is being compressed by the tape drive. The only thing that I got was the bacula information about the SD and FD Written and the mt command in Linux don't say me the real data size of the volume, so I chose to trust on the software compression...YEAH I'm noob on Tape manipulation... :t Just fill a tape with bacua. Then look at its status bacula will tell you how much data has been written to the tape. If this amount is than the tape's native size compression is on. Remember the tape drive compresses data at 120 MB/s while software compression you will be lucky to get 1/10 that if you have a 4 GHz processor. John -- Storage Efficiency Calculator This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage- ments, worldwide. Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to the right place. Try It Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Backup Folders using Wild and RegExDir
Hi all,
I'm trying to backup Desktop and Documents from all users on a client.
Bacula manual is a good point to start / Page 172 does have an example to
backup only pictures folders from Windows Clients.
Unfortunaly all backups and settings I tried did not include any of the files
or folders (or to much of them).
Directorys to backup:
C:/Dokumente und Einstellungen/*/Desktop/*
C:/Dokumente und Einstellungen/*/Eigene Dateien/*
--
My FileSet:
FileSet {
Name = ClientWindows
Include {
File = C:/Dokumente und Einstellungen
Options {
signature = MD5
compression = GZIP
IgnoreCase = yes
#Alle Benutzerverzeichnise mit einbeziehen.
RegExDir=^C:/Dokumente und Einstellungen/[^/]+$
#Alle Benutzer Desktop Verzeichnise und Unterverzeichnise
Wild = C:/Dokumente und Einstellungen/*/Desktop/*
#Alle Benutzer Eigene Dateien und Unterverzeichnise
Wild = C:/Dokumente und Einstellungen/*/Eigene Dateien/*
}
Options {
Exclude = yes
IgnoreCase = yes
Wild= C:/Dokumente und Einstellungen/*
}
}
}
Where is my mistake and why ?
Thanks for any hint.
Cheers,
Richard
--
Storage Efficiency Calculator
This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that
has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage-
ments, worldwide. Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to
the right place. Try It Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Performance
OK John...I'll test it. On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:13 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Rickifer Barros rickiferbar...@gmail.com wrote: I did this beforebut, I didn't know how check in Debian if it really is being compressed by the tape drive. The only thing that I got was the bacula information about the SD and FD Written and the mt command in Linux don't say me the real data size of the volume, so I chose to trust on the software compression...YEAH I'm noob on Tape manipulation... :t Just fill a tape with bacua. Then look at its status bacula will tell you how much data has been written to the tape. If this amount is than the tape's native size compression is on. Remember the tape drive compresses data at 120 MB/s while software compression you will be lucky to get 1/10 that if you have a 4 GHz processor. John -- Storage Efficiency Calculator This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage- ments, worldwide. Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to the right place. Try It Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Non-bacula: Tar restore in an autochanger
I've been handed a tar backup comprising 66 (yes really) LTO4 tapes. For obvious reasons I'd prefer not to have to load the tape drive manually for each tape. Does anyone have pointers (or even better a script) on automating this kind of restore? -- Storage Efficiency Calculator This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage- ments, worldwide. Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to the right place. Try It Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Performance
On 07/25/11 11:13, John Drescher wrote: On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Rickifer Barros rickiferbar...@gmail.com wrote: I did this beforebut, I didn't know how check in Debian if it really is being compressed by the tape drive. The only thing that I got was the bacula information about the SD and FD Written and the mt command in Linux don't say me the real data size of the volume, so I chose to trust on the software compression...YEAH I'm noob on Tape manipulation... :t Just fill a tape with bacua. Then look at its status bacula will tell you how much data has been written to the tape. If this amount is than the tape's native size compression is on. Remember the tape drive compresses data at 120 MB/s while software compression you will be lucky to get 1/10 that if you have a 4 GHz processor. mt can both get and set options including compression. It's all in the man page. -- Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355 ala...@caerllewys.net ala...@metrocast.net p...@co.ordinate.org Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, SQL wrangler, Free Stater It's not the years, it's the mileage. -- Storage Efficiency Calculator This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage- ments, worldwide. Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to the right place. Try It Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Non-bacula: Tar restore in an autochanger
On Jul 25, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Alan Brown wrote:
I've been handed a tar backup comprising 66 (yes really) LTO4 tapes.
For obvious reasons I'd prefer not to have to load the tape drive
manually for each tape. Does anyone have pointers (or even better a
script) on automating this kind of restore?
I'm sorry Alan...
I have no idea how to detect that tar needs the next volume, but I do have
a script that loads each tape in turn. It was designed for wiping the tapes,
but I hope it's useful to you.
[dan@kraken:~/bin] $ cat erase-tapes.sh
#!/bin/sh
#
# Copyright 2006 Dan Langille
#
# This script should be read in conjunction with
# http://www.freebsddiary.org/tape-testing.php
#
# Change this to the location of your script
#
MTXCHANGER=/usr/local/sbin/mtx-changer
CHANGER=/dev/${1}
DRIVE=/dev/${2}
LOGGER=/usr/bin/logger
ECHO=/bin/echo
echo things
echo ${MTXCHANGER} ${CHANGER} list ${DRIVE}
echo
SLOTS=`${MTXCHANGER} ${CHANGER} list`
for slot_vol in $SLOTS
do
slot=`echo ${slot_vol} | sed -ne 's/^\([0-9]*\):.*/\1/p'`
vol=`echo ${slot_vol} | sed -ne 's/^[0-9]*:\(.*\)/\1/p'`
${ECHO} loading $slot
${MTXCHANGER} ${CHANGER} load $slot ${DRIVE} 0
sleep 60
mt -f ${DRIVE} rewind
mt -f ${DRIVE} weof
mt -f ${DRIVE} rewind
echo label storage=DigitalTapeLibrary volume=${vol} slot=${slot}
pool=Scratch | bconsole
echo 'umount storage=DigitalTapeLibrary' | bconsole
${ECHO} unloading $slot
${MTXCHANGER} ${CHANGER} unload $slot ${DRIVE} 0
done
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
--
Storage Efficiency Calculator
This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that
has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage-
ments, worldwide. Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to
the right place. Try It Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Non-bacula: Tar restore in an autochanger
Am 25.07.2011 18:37, schrieb Alan Brown: For obvious reasons I'd prefer not to have to load the tape drive manually for each tape. GNU Tar does support multiple-volume archives: http://www.gnu.org/software/tar/manual/html_section/Using-Multiple-Tapes.html#SEC162 In particular, take a look at the --multiple-volume and --new-volume-script command line switches. Best regards Ansgar -- Storage Efficiency Calculator This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage- ments, worldwide. Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to the right place. Try It Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Non-bacula: Tar restore in an autochanger
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 05:37:46PM +0100, Alan Brown wrote: I've been handed a tar backup comprising 66 (yes really) LTO4 tapes. For obvious reasons I'd prefer not to have to load the tape drive manually for each tape. Does anyone have pointers (or even better a script) on automating this kind of restore? Sorry, I have no script and never have been in a situation like yours. But tar is 'tape archiver' and it knows -M for multi volume archive -F run script at end of each tape (implies -M) I'd use -F to call a script that - unmounts the current tape - mounts the next one - either by 'mtx next' + some end of slots logic - mtx load SLOT - if it has been the last tape in the changer prompts for a new set of tapes - else exits for tar to continue Regards, Adrian -- LiHAS - Adrian Reyer - Hessenwiesenstraße 10 - D-70565 Stuttgart Fon: +49 (7 11) 78 28 50 90 - Fax: +49 (7 11) 78 28 50 91 Mail: li...@lihas.de - Web: http://lihas.de Linux, Netzwerke, Consulting Support - USt-ID: DE 227 816 626 Stuttgart -- Storage Efficiency Calculator This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage- ments, worldwide. Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to the right place. Try It Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Bacula-Web 5.1.0 alpha available for download
I'm proud to announce you that the alpha version of Bacula-Web 5.1.0 is available for download After I've spent the last 6 month to provide a more efficient and bug fewer tools, here's what you can expect from this version. PHP4 support ... For security and performance reasons, PHP4 support has been totally removed from this version. You should use PHP version 5.0.0 at least. Configuration file ... The configuration file has been totally reviewed, it's now a PHP script. SQLite and postgreSQL support ... The support of SQLite and postgreSQL has been hugely improved, especially for SQLite users. Improved interface ... The interface of Bacula-Web has been completely reviewed and nbsp;(re-written). This version include - A new Dashboard - A more efficient test page - A backup job report page - A page that shows each pool with volumes information - ... More W3C compliant ... A lot of effort has been dedicated to html, css and javascript code of Bacula-Web. Translations ... There were lots of changes in templates since the last version, so the new file messages.po will be made available on the web site soon (Translating section) Documentation ... The documentation section on the project site will be updated as soon as possible. Installation and configuration steps are explained in the file INSTALL.txt in the root folder. All others informations still available trough the official project site (http://bacula-web.dflc.ch) Bugs and feedbacks ... In line with functionality of previous versions, it is still possible create a bug report in the bug tracking tool for Bacula-Web. Don't forget to specify the version 5.1-alpha. In the meantime, you may drop me an email if you have any questions or feedbacks. Best regards -- Storage Efficiency Calculator This modeling tool is based on patent-pending intellectual property that has been used successfully in hundreds of IBM storage optimization engage- ments, worldwide. Store less, Store more with what you own, Move data to the right place. Try It Now! http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51427378/___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Remote backup, Failed to connect to Storage daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 it seems i was able to get things working, by adding this to my /etc/hosts on home1: 192.168.1.139 home.dyndns.org (192.168.1.139 being home1's local address) and then i used the certificate for home.dyndns.org instead of the one for home1.local for Director-SD and FD-SD communication. communication works between all daemons, and a backup of work1 is running. this doesn't seem very elegant to me, though, because home.dyndns.org typically resolves to my router's WAN address. are there any inherent problems with this implementation? any better suggestions? thanks so much -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iEYEAREIAAYFAk4uDG4ACgkQXhfCJNu98qDFEQCg8LdYF5JI+PrnuKI3ZMzDD10u eLsAoP7EemYk/474TlyswqYtzoLQi10K =5oKL -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Magic Quadrant for Content-Aware Data Loss Prevention Research study explores the data loss prevention market. Includes in-depth analysis on the changes within the DLP market, and the criteria used to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these DLP solutions. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51385063/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Performance
2011/7/25 Rickifer Barros rickiferbar...@gmail.com: Hello Guys... This weekend I did a backup with a size of 41.92 GB that took 1 hour and 24 minutes with a rate of 8.27 MB/s. My Bacula Server is installed in a IBM server connected in a Tape Drive LTO4 (120 MB/s) via SAS connection (3 Gb/s). I'm using Encryption and Compression Gzip6. Disable software compression. The tape drive will compress much faster than the client. If you can find compressible patterns in the encrypted data stream then you are not properly encrypting it. The only option would be to compress before encryption which means you can't use the compression function in the tape drive unless the tape drive also does the encryption (some do). Use a lower GZIP compression level to see if it gets you better speed without sacrificing too much performance... I suspect the speed hit is going to be the encryption though. James -- Magic Quadrant for Content-Aware Data Loss Prevention Research study explores the data loss prevention market. Includes in-depth analysis on the changes within the DLP market, and the criteria used to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these DLP solutions. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51385063/ ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
