[Bacula-users] Re: [Bacula-devel] Vacation

2005-05-19 Thread Jo
Kern Sibbald wrote: Hello, This is to let you know that I will be on vacation from the 21st of May until the 28th. Though I will be here tomorrow, I'm likely to be a bit occupied with a lot of last minute things. If all goes well, I may have access to the Internet at reasonable speeds (i.e. som

[Bacula-users] Vacation

2005-05-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, This is to let you know that I will be on vacation from the 21st of May until the 28th. Though I will be here tomorrow, I'm likely to be a bit occupied with a lot of last minute things. If all goes well, I may have access to the Internet at reasonable speeds (i.e. something more than a

[Bacula-users] bconsole mount

2005-05-19 Thread McGraw, Robert P.
I am trying to test/learn the bacula package but already stumped. I have a STK L10 library with one SDLT 220 tape drive. I have set up the mx-changer and have tested thoroughly. I start up bconsole ran setdebug 10 and run the command "mount SDLT1" which SLDT is my storage device in bacula-sd.co

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: urgent windows recover problem

2005-05-19 Thread Gerd Mueller
Hi Arno, thank you for your help. I wrote an update on bugs.bacula.org. The problem was caused by the ownership of the specific folder. The folder was own by only one specific user. Gerd On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 15:42 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi. > > I just hat a look at bugs.bacula.org and

Re: [Bacula-users] Speed of Windows FD

2005-05-19 Thread Alan Brown
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote: This problem seems to be rather current on Win2000 systems, and other Windows systems. Though I do not have any proof except that it only happens with Windows systems, I attribute it to a bug or deliberate throttling in the Microsoft networking code. I woul

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: urgent windows recover problem

2005-05-19 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi. I just hat a look at bugs.bacula.org and read more about your problem. Apart from the suggestion to consider the user ids (AD etc.) I suggest you try restoring the files you need to a system which is not part of a windows domain. Just hook up a computer with windows XP home or windows 98 and

[Bacula-users] Re: Windows File Data

2005-05-19 Thread Alan Brown
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Arno Lehmann wrote: Alan, do you have more information on that? Like, for example, what the ADS has to be named and what it contains? Not yet, I only discovered this last week and my Bacula brief doesn't cover windows systems, so I haven't been able to justify spending time

[Bacula-users] Re: Windows File Data

2005-05-19 Thread Arno Lehmann
Alan, do you have more information on that? Like, for example, what the ADS has to be named and what it contains? I think this is indeed something serious... ok, sometimes MS will tell us that with Windows you don't need an administrator, but I guess most here have other experiences :-) Well,

RE: [Bacula-users] Speed of Windows FD

2005-05-19 Thread Matthew Butt
Well I'm actually running Windows 2003 Standard server and it's still slow! Matthew Butt + T R I C Y C L E > -Original Message- > From: Alan Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 9:06 AM > To: Kern Sibbald > Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Martin Simmons;

RE: [Bacula-users] Speed of Windows FD

2005-05-19 Thread Matthew Butt
Well I'm a developer.. with a Win installation that doesn't work, I'll see what I can do :) Better figure out how to build Bacula-fd for Win :) Matthew Butt + T R I C Y C L E > -Original Message- > From: Kern Sibbald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 8:09 AM > To:

[Bacula-users] Windows File Data was: Incremental Backups and 'new' old files

2005-05-19 Thread Arno Lehmann
This discussion reminds me of something else... Alan Brown wrote: On Thu, 19 May 2005, Arno Lehmann wrote: As far as I know, NTFS has similar timestamps - atime, mtime and ctime - as normal unix file systems. I'm not sure, but I think I remember reading somewhere that under Windows you can avoid

Re: [Bacula-users] Speed of Windows FD

2005-05-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 19 May 2005 14:39, Matthew Butt wrote: > Well I'm a developer.. with a Win installation that doesn't work, I'll > see what I can do :) > > Better figure out how to build Bacula-fd for Win :) See /src/win32/README.win32 preferably from the current CVS. In addition (not yet noted in th

[Bacula-users] Re: Windows File Data was: Incremental Backups and 'new' old files

2005-05-19 Thread Alan Brown
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Arno Lehmann wrote: There are more attributes than that and there are more access attributes than just user/group/world too. Well, sure, but those don't matter here :-) I have actually used them. More importantly, it appears that WinXP service pack 2 is starting to implement t

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Job Behaviour

2005-05-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 19 May 2005 12:27, Alan Brown wrote: > On Thu, 19 May 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > Well, the idea of obtaining a tape drive at the last minute is > > interesting, and I'm going to think about it carefully, but my intuition > > tells me it is dangerous. You could have 10 jobs partially

Re: [Bacula-users] Speed of Windows FD

2005-05-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, This problem seems to be rather current on Win2000 systems, and other Windows systems. Though I do not have any proof except that it only happens with Windows systems, I attribute it to a bug or deliberate throttling in the Microsoft networking code. If someone could finally figure out

Re: [Bacula-users] Incremental Backups and 'new' old files

2005-05-19 Thread Alan Brown
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Arno Lehmann wrote: As far as I know, NTFS has similar timestamps - atime, mtime and ctime - as normal unix file systems. I'm not sure, but I think I remember reading somewhere that under Windows you can avoid changing them when you modify a file. There are more attributes t

Re: [Bacula-users] Incremental Backups and 'new' old files

2005-05-19 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 19 May 2005 02:02:37 +0200, Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Arno> Ryan LeBlanc wrote: >> Arno, thank you for your response. >> >> Here are our details: >> >> Bacula version 1.36.3 server running on Linux kernel 2.4.26. It has >> ext2 partitions mounted (rw)

Re: [Bacula-users] Speed of Windows FD

2005-05-19 Thread Russell Howe
Matthew Butt wrote: > I'm trying to figure out at what speed/duplex the Windows server is but > the switch it's plugged into shows that's it's also 1000Mbps full > duplex. Cabling is all Cat5e. GigE doesn't do half duplex AFAIK, so if it's GigE too, it's full duplex (I think CSMA/CD becomes too d

RE: [Bacula-users] Speed of Windows FD

2005-05-19 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 18 May 2005 17:09:10 -0400, "Matthew Butt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: Matt> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Matt> Thread-Topic: [Bacula-users] Speed of Windows FD Matt> I have two identical Win 2k3 servers (Dell PowerEdge 2800, Matt> U320 >> RAID5, Matt>

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Job Behaviour

2005-05-19 Thread Alan Brown
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Kern Sibbald wrote: Well, the idea of obtaining a tape drive at the last minute is interesting, and I'm going to think about it carefully, but my intuition tells me it is dangerous. You could have 10 jobs partially completed all waiting for one tape drive. This could bring yo

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent Job Behaviour

2005-05-19 Thread Alan Brown
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Arno Lehmann wrote: This says to me that as long as the Pools of the Jobs being queued match, the Jobs will all run concurrently. Jobs however that have mismatching Pools will instead queue and wait for the storage device to free when previous jobs complete. That's about it,

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: urgent windows recover problem

2005-05-19 Thread Gerd Mueller
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 17:59 +0200, Felix Schwarz wrote: > Hi, > > Gerd Mueller wrote: > > backup-sd: Ready to read from volume "full0019" on device > > /var/backups/bacula/File. > > kliniken-data-fd: -rwxrwxrwx 1 00 19456 2005-02-24 > > 09:21:41 /tmp/bacula-restores/e//Meddok/2

[Bacula-users] Re: AW: Confusing "OK"-Message after restore

2005-05-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 19 May 2005 08:00, Masopust Christian wrote: > All right, here's the message i got when this backup was run: > > > 18-May 03:05 atpcc7fc-dir: Start Backup JobId 235, > Job=atpc4ujc-data.2005-05-18_03.05.02 > 18-May 03:05 atpc4ujc-fd: Could not stat D:/CD-Copy: ERR=The system > can