Hi,
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009, Niklas Hagman wrote:
Thank you James for that answer. As I expected, 2 full backups seems to
be needed to exist to be able to have 2 weeks possibility to restore.
But what about this:
(F = full, I= incremental. Day 1 to day 13.)
F+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I
Then
Dear all,
I am considering to use migration jobs to set up a D2D2T backup
scenario. I am actually considering to use pools like that:
Migration Job
Backup Job -- WEEKLY1 Tape Pool
/
Backup
Timo Neuvonen timo-n...@tee-en.net kirjoitti viestissä
news:hfjoo9$ks...@ger.gmane.org...
Simon J Mudd sjm...@pobox.com kirjoitti viestissä
news:m3fx7mkdv3@mad06.wl0.org...
timo-n...@tee-en.net (Timo Neuvonen) writes:
Simon J Mudd sjm...@pobox.com kirjoitti viestissä
...
Yes, but
I am considering to use migration jobs to set up a D2D2T backup
scenario. I am actually considering to use pools like that:
Migration Job
Backup Job -- WEEKLY1 Tape Pool
/
Backup
James Harper wrote:
I am considering to use migration jobs to set up a D2D2T backup
scenario. I am actually considering to use pools like that:
Migration Job
Backup Job -- WEEKLY1 Tape Pool
Software data compression can be enabled in Bacula by the Director's Fileset
Compression=GZIP option. But is there any way to control whether to
compress data or not, based on the storage used?
I mean, can I use software data compression for file/disk devices, and not
for tape devices, with the
Hi there Gavin. Thanks for the answer.
It seems like I have misunderstood something here.
You say that it only requires about 1.4GB more disk space to have
F+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+F2+I2+I2+I2+I2+I2+I2+I2+I2+I2+I2+I2+I2+I2
where F2 is a VirtualFull backup.
Do you mean that a Virtual Backup
thebuzz wrote:
Hi
Im having a big problem with an Windows 2000 old ASP server that I try to
backup via Bacula
FD on Windows server is 3.0.2 and server is 3.0.2
I get an 3Gb backup every time - but when I do an bconsole command
list files jobid=17
it shows
*list files jobid=17
thebuzz schrieb:
Im having a big problem with an Windows 2000 old ASP server that I try to
backup via Bacula
FD on Windows server is 3.0.2 and server is 3.0.2
I get an 3Gb backup every time - but when I do an bconsole command
list files jobid=17
it shows
*list files jobid=17
No
Is there any way to override Job/File retention periods that are specified
in the Client part of Director configuration?
This need arises, when I use the same Client spec to run both daily and
archive backups.
Archive ones are run very seldom, and written to non-recyclable volumes.
They are
Hi,
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009, Alex Chekholko wrote:
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 13:46:02 +
Gavin McCullagh gavin.mccull...@gcd.ie wrote:
I started a full backup last night of a tired old Windows-based Dell NAS.
It's very slow. The filesystem is full and super-fragmented. I also have
Hi,
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009, Niklas Hagman - FiberDirekt AB wrote:
Hi there Gavin. Thanks for the answer.
It seems like I have misunderstood something here.
You say that it only requires about 1.4GB more disk space to have
F+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+I+F2+I2+I2+I2+I2+I2+I2+I2+I2+I2+I2+I2+I2+I2
01-Dec 23#58;06 kopi3.domain.dk-dir JobId 44#58; Start Backup JobId 44,
Job=aspjob.2009-12-01_23.05.00_05 01-Dec 23#58;06 kopi3.domain.dk-dir JobId
44#58; Max configured use duration exceeded. Marking Volume Vol0014 as
Used.
02-Dec 01#58;22 kopi3.domain.dk-dir JobId 44#58; Fatal error#58;
I was wondering if Bacula might be in a position to estimate or help the
user estimate the time remaining based on what it already knows? I'm not
sure if it does any sort of internal estimate at the start or if it just
starts traversing the filesystem sending what it needs to send.
Bacula
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Timo Neuvonen timo-n...@tee-en.net wrote:
Software data compression can be enabled in Bacula by the Director's Fileset
Compression=GZIP option. But is there any way to control whether to
compress data or not, based on the storage used?
I mean, can I use
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 19:32 -0700, Craig White wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 17:41 -0700, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 13:24 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
I've been all through the documentation and I was sure I set up things
correctly.
Server is CentOS-5 built 3.0.3
Am Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:17:07 +0200 schrieb Timo Neuvonen:
Is there any way to override Job/File retention periods that are
specified in the Client part of Director configuration?
This need arises, when I use the same Client spec to run both daily
and archive backups.
Archive ones are
Thomas Mueller tho...@chaschperli.ch kirjoitti viestissä
news:hflt3c$6o...@ger.gmane.org...
Am Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:17:07 +0200 schrieb Timo Neuvonen:
Is there any way to override Job/File retention periods that are
specified in the Client part of Director configuration?
This need arises,
Everyone,
I currently have a single server with 2.5TB of local data that I need to
back up. The problem I am running into is that the server only has a
100Mb/s network card so I am limited to 12MB/s of data transfer. I
thought using the loopback interface would give better speed but it
seems that
Hayden Katzenellenbogen hay...@nextlevelinternet.com kirjoitti viestissä
news:88bc6885d33a9d42a1ccb45e8749525ed15...@pigeon.sandiego.nextlevelinternet.com...
Everyone,
I currently have a single server with 2.5TB of local data that I need to
back up. The problem I am running into is that the
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Timo Neuvonen timo-n...@tee-en.net wrote:
Hayden Katzenellenbogen hay...@nextlevelinternet.com kirjoitti viestissä
news:88bc6885d33a9d42a1ccb45e8749525ed15...@pigeon.sandiego.nextlevelinternet.com...
Everyone,
I currently have a single server with 2.5TB of
John,
I have moved the database onto a dedicated server. I also added a SATA drive on
a different controller for spooling the data. While the data is spooling I am
seeing 9.5MB/s for writing to the spool drive. When it despools I am seeing
50-55MB/s.
The storage is a Dell TL2000 tape array.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Hayden Katzenellenbogen
hay...@nextlevelinternet.com wrote:
John,
I have moved the database onto a dedicated server. I also added a SATA drive
on a different controller for spooling the data. While the data is spooling I
am seeing 9.5MB/s for writing to the
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Hayden Katzenellenbogen
hay...@nextlevelinternet.com wrote:
Yes it is a raid-6 configuration running on a 3ware 9690SA-8I.
Do you have attribute spooling on?
John
--
Return on
I was going to say no. but looking in the documentation
NOTE: When Spool Data is set to yes, Spool Attributes is also
automatically set to yes.
I have to say yes. I have spool data enabled thus spool attributes is on
as well.
-H
-Original Message-
From: John Drescher
Should it be set to no?
Also can you have spool data on and spool attributes off?
-H
-Original Message-
From: Hayden Katzenellenbogen [mailto:hay...@nextlevelinternet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 1:33 PM
To: John Drescher; bacula-users
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Network
John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com kirjoitti viestissä
news:387ee2020912081330v6e8fa197s5009971859acb...@mail.gmail.com...
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Hayden Katzenellenbogen
hay...@nextlevelinternet.com wrote:
Yes it is a raid-6 configuration running on a 3ware 9690SA-8I.
I've never had
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Hayden Katzenellenbogen
hay...@nextlevelinternet.com wrote:
Should it be set to no?
Also can you have spool data on and spool attributes off?
Yes. But I was asking because the job will backup the data faster if
the attributes are spooled. The reason is without
TiN,
The write-cache is already enabled. Just checked. I have turned all the
settings onto performance just in case. But looking at iostat it does not seem
to have made any difference.
-H
-Original Message-
From: Timo Neuvonen [mailto:timo-n...@tee-en.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Timo Neuvonen timo-n...@tee-en.net wrote:
John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com kirjoitti viestissä
news:387ee2020912081330v6e8fa197s5009971859acb...@mail.gmail.com...
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Hayden Katzenellenbogen
hay...@nextlevelinternet.com wrote:
Yes
Write cache is enabled.
I have a separate sata drive connected to the motherboards sata controller that
I am using to spool the data.
The only thing that is coming off this raid array is the data to be backed up.
Writing to that array is done only once per hour and totals about 1gig per day.
Hi,
I've upgraded to 3.0.3 from 3.0.2 a while ago and I'm facing serious problems
with bacula-dir stability.
Just after its start, Director is able to perform any request I have (perform
a backup, restore, reload etc.). But once I've got the task done, Director
stops listening me - the
I have what sounds like it is a less-powerful system than yours, and I
see significantly faster performance from Bacula 3.0.2 (and before that
with 2.4 and earlier). My system uses a 3ware 9500 connected merely via
32-bit PCI, and I have a single separate spool drive connected via the
Ah HAH! The old I just upgraded to bacula 3.03 this morning mistake. The
problem here could be what happened to me. The database needs to be bounced.
Yes, indexes dropped and re-init-ed. It was a few moons ago and I forget
what exactly I did. Horribly slow backups and they NEVER finished and
34 matches
Mail list logo
