On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 20:51:18 -0500, Wayne Spivak said:
Installed Bacula 5.0.2 on Fedora 14 (called Kira).
Previously had it installed and working on Fedora 11 (called Beech)
I copied all the conf files from Beech to Kira (adjusted them for new
Machine names), debugged normal errors
Here the last few error messages:
EMMA:
02-Jan 21:17 kira.sbanetweb.com-dir JobId 38: Fatal error: bsock.c:135
Unable to connect to Client: emma.sbanetweb.com-fd on 192.68.0.30:9102.
ERR=Interrupted system call
03-Jan 23:28 kira.sbanetweb.com-dir JobId 48: Fatal error: No Job status
returned from
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:06:52AM -0600, Ben Beuchler wrote:
Once a year, I need to create a full backup that will be stored
off-site. This backup will not be readily available for normal
restores. The obvious approach would be to delete that backup (and
its volumes) from the catalog so
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 07:36:32 -0500, Wayne Spivak said:
Here the last few error messages:
EMMA:
02-Jan 21:17 kira.sbanetweb.com-dir JobId 38: Fatal error: bsock.c:135
Unable to connect to Client: emma.sbanetweb.com-fd on 192.68.0.30:9102.
ERR=Interrupted system call
03-Jan 23:28
Hello list,
I would like to tell you about a problem we're having after upgrading
bacula 2.2.6 to 5.0.3.
In our setup we have the main bacula server (director and storage) with
a LTO3 tape drive. All jobs are done on this server using his local
storage (storage1). The is also another storage
Hi
I am running some job on the same storage, on a file device but it's
always waiting on max storage jobs however I set Maximum concurrent
job to 10 in the storage daemon configuration
On storage daemon :
Device {
Name = DataTest
Media Type = File
Archive Device = /BaculaData/Test/
I do it at last 31th december.
I created a Full backup (VirtualFull) to a tape and purged the volume. But,
you should not to do differential ou incremental backups between you full
and purge.
You can use bscan to repopulate the catalog again if you need.
Kleber
2011/1/5 Ben Beuchler
2011/1/6 Kleber Leal kleber.l...@gmail.com:
I do it at last 31th december.
I created a Full backup (VirtualFull) to a tape and purged the volume. But,
you should not to do differential ou incremental backups between you full
and purge.
You can use bscan to repopulate the catalog again if you
I've been trying to get my head around virtual full backups.
Now, from my understanding, (i'm 80% through my work day, shut down 20
tickets, and had to deal with too many user incidents for my liking, so
please bare with me if I say something stupid!), virtual fulls can be
run on the same pool
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 05:02:47PM +, Mister IT Guru wrote:
I've been trying to get my head around virtual full backups.
Now, from my understanding, (i'm 80% through my work day, shut down 20
tickets, and had to deal with too many user incidents for my liking, so
please bare with me if
On 06/01/2011 17:16, Graham Keeling wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 05:02:47PM +, Mister IT Guru wrote:
I've been trying to get my head around virtual full backups.
Now, from my understanding, (i'm 80% through my work day, shut down 20
tickets, and had to deal with too many user incidents
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 05:24:07PM +, Mister IT Guru wrote:
On 06/01/2011 17:16, Graham Keeling wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 05:02:47PM +, Mister IT Guru wrote:
I've been trying to get my head around virtual full backups.
Now, from my understanding, (i'm 80% through my work day,
On 01/06/2011 11:24 AM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
On 06/01/2011 17:16, Graham Keeling wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 05:02:47PM +, Mister IT Guru wrote:
I've been trying to get my head around virtual full backups.
[...]
So, I would be very pleased if a VirtualFull also grabbed new files from
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:36:10AM -0600, Sean Clark wrote:
On 01/06/2011 11:24 AM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
On 06/01/2011 17:16, Graham Keeling wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 05:02:47PM +, Mister IT Guru wrote:
I've been trying to get my head around virtual full backups.
[...]
So, I
On 01/06/11 12:16, Graham Keeling wrote:
With my configuration, a VirtualFull sometimes prevents an Incremental from
running, because the VirtualFull took too long (or vice versa). I have not
been
able to solve this, because every idea that I've come up with either doesn't
work or makes
On 01/06/11 12:35, Graham Keeling wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 05:24:07PM +, Mister IT Guru wrote:
On 06/01/2011 17:16, Graham Keeling wrote:
So, I would be very pleased if a VirtualFull also grabbed new files from the
client.
Thank you for pointing this out! So it doesn't grab new
On 06/01/2011 17:44, Graham Keeling wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:36:10AM -0600, Sean Clark wrote:
On 01/06/2011 11:24 AM, Mister IT Guru wrote:
On 06/01/2011 17:16, Graham Keeling wrote:
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 05:02:47PM +, Mister IT Guru wrote:
I've been trying to get my head
On 01/06/11 12:54, Mister IT Guru wrote:
Okay, I see the point of Virtual Full Backup - this is to be done
without talking to the client at call, (i did know that! I've been doing
my homework!) Well, now that I'm looking at the virtual backup in the
capacity in which it was intended, it
Hello,
My backup of the Catalog is stuck in the running status. The Catalog
job is defined as:
Job {
Name = BackupCatalog
JobDefs = DefaultJob
Level = Full
FileSet=Catalog
Schedule = WeeklyCycleAfterBackup
# This creates an ASCII copy of the catalog
# Arguments to
Try run this script.
Maybe it is bad.
Kleber
2011/1/6 Patrick McEvoy psmce...@gmail.com
Hello,
My backup of the Catalog is stuck in the running status. The Catalog job
is defined as:
Job {
Name = BackupCatalog
JobDefs = DefaultJob
Level = Full
FileSet=Catalog
Schedule =
On 01/06/2011 01:18 PM, Kleber Leal wrote:
Try run this script.
Maybe it is bad.
Kleber
2011/1/6 Patrick McEvoy psmce...@gmail.com mailto:psmce...@gmail.com
Hello,
My backup of the Catalog is stuck in the running status. The
Catalog job is defined as:
Job {
Name =
Hi
Anyone doing VirtualFull backups using tapedrives only?
Can they shortly describe their setup? pro/con/etc?
Thanks.
--
Jesper
--
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to
On Thursday 06 January 2011 18:50:14 Hugo Letemplier wrote:
Hi
I am running some job on the same storage, on a file device but it's
always waiting on max storage jobs however I set Maximum concurrent
job to 10 in the storage daemon configuration
On storage daemon :
Device {
Name =
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, Arunav Mandal wrote:
Is there any Bacula 5.0.3 Ubuntu 10.10 packages?
you could try to download the package sources of 5.0.2 and the vanilla
source from 5.0.3 and combine them to new packages. I've done that for
Debian Lenny some days ago and it works quite well.
Regards,
Maybe try looking at your database and seeing if there are any
locks still in place?
--
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their
Hi
Anyone doing VirtualFull backups using tapedrives only?
Can they shortly describe their setup? pro/con/etc?
I'm not, but can tell you it's probably not a good idea - you'd end up
with extra wear and tear on your tape drives, as well as greatly reduced
performance while the target tape
Hey to all on the list, sorry for such a basic high level question, but due
to time issues, I am reading the docs and posting at the same time.
I have around 1T of storage compressed (numerous servers, websites,
database, etc.) and around 1 1/2T to store so I can't do a live copy of the
files nor
On 06/01/11, lance raymond (lance.raym...@gmail.com) wrote:
I have around 1T of storage compressed (numerous servers, websites,
database, etc.) and around 1 1/2T to store so I can't do a live copy of the
files nor can I keep more than 1 full copy. The old backup system is not in
good
On 7/01/2011 3:31 AM, Jesper Krogh wrote:
Hi
Anyone doing VirtualFull backups using tapedrives only?
Can they shortly describe their setup? pro/con/etc?
Thanks.
Yes I am.
I am using a TL2000 tape library with two drives.
The technique can't work if
I have a situation where I have two geographically separate
networks, both of which are using bacula locally. I'll call
them network A and network B. Currently, (bacula) server A
on network A backs up network A machines, and server B on
network B backs up network B machines.
I'd like to
--On Friday, January 07, 2011 12:23:43 AM -0700 Devin Reade g...@gno.org
wrote:
I'd like to (additionally) set things up so that server A
performs offsite backup for network B, and server B does the
converse for network A (for DR purposes).
I'm also open to other configurations, such as having
31 matches
Mail list logo
