Am 28.06.2011 18:40, schrieb Steve Costaras:
>
>
> How would the the various parts communicate if you're running multiple
> instances on different ports? I would think just by creating multiple
> jobs would create multiple socket streams and do the same thing.
I should have gotten another coff
Hello everybody
from some time I have an annoying problem:
- from time to time firewall drops connection for some hosts during
backup process, as a consequence backup jobs failed. this is normal.
- but storage daemon believes that such jobs are stiil active. when
amount of such failed jobs is g
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> We're using Bacula for some backups with three SDs so far, and I wonder if
> it's possible somehow to allow for client / laptop backups in a good manner.
> As far as I can see, this will need to either be client-initiated
On 23/06/2011 10:06, Brian Debelius wrote:
I
found something strange. If I try to issue this command:
mt -f /dev/nst0 status
I'll get one line that says:
Tape block size 0 bytes. Density code 0x81 (DLT 15GB
co
John,
Please accept my apologies. It was disk space issue after all. The server
had 1.7T and our administrator mounted the backup partition in wrong path. I
was stupid enough not to check the mount points.
Tons of thanks for your valuable time and pointing me to right direction. I
am glad to be p
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Venkatesh K Reddy
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:52 AM, John Drescher wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Venkatesh K Reddy
>> wrote:
>> > I don't think I have used unmount after removing old state files and
>> > nuking
>> > all data in sq
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:52 AM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Venkatesh K Reddy
> wrote:
> > I don't think I have used unmount after removing old state files and
> nuking
> > all data in sql database.
> >
> > I had started afresh and backup ran smoothly and creat
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Venkatesh K Reddy
wrote:
> I don't think I have used unmount after removing old state files and nuking
> all data in sql database.
>
> I had started afresh and backup ran smoothly and created about 30 volumes
> (256MB each) and then stopped with following message.
I don't think I have used unmount after removing old state files and nuking
all data in sql database.
I had started afresh and backup ran smoothly and created about 30 volumes
(256MB each) and then stopped with following message.
Running Jobs:
Console connected at 28-Jun-11 18:45
JobId Level N
> What are you looking for that Max Full Interval doesn't do? If you set
> Max Full Interval to 30 days, and only schedule incremental jobs, then
> every 30 days one of your incrementals gets bumped to a full. Are you
> looking to prevent someone from manually firing off a full?
>
> Mark
These
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Venkatesh K Reddy
wrote:
> I had used unmount. But, I nuked the whole configuration.
>
If you ever use umount then the next volume that bacula will want you
will have to mount it since umount takes the storage device out of
bacula's control. If you just want to u
I had used unmount. But, I nuked the whole configuration.
/etc/init.d/bacula-sd stop
/etc/init.d/bacula-dir stop
/usr/lib/bacula/drop_mysql_tables
/usr/lib/bacula/make_mysql_tables
rm -rf /var/lib/bacula/*
/etc/init.d/bacula-sd start
/etc/init.d/bacula-dir start
I did the same on the client.
Tha
2011/6/28 Venkatesh K Reddy :
> Hi,
>
> I am a newbie to Bacula. I tried to find out what is happening in the list
> and could not get right answer. Probably I am not searching with right
> question or looking at right place.
>
> We have a test setup with File storage. All daemons are able to talk
Hi,
I am a newbie to Bacula. I tried to find out what is happening in the list
and could not get right answer. Probably I am not searching with right
question or looking at right place.
We have a test setup with File storage. All daemons are able to talk to each
other and a small backup successfu
Yes, in this case the 'client' is the backup server, as I had a free
slot for the tape drives and due to the size didn't want to carry this
over the network.
If I split this up to separate jobs, say one job per mount point (have
~30 mount points at this time) that may work however I may be
Steve,
You should be able to run multiple file daemons on the storage device, but
a better idea might be to run the backups (and restores) off the clients,
as many in parallel as your system can handle. Look into concurrency.
If you split up the fileset into separate jobs you can have them go
Hi,
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
> We do this in a somewhat manual way. The client computer has a bconsole
> configured. When the laptop owner wants a backup, they start bconsole,
> then type "run", "yes", "quit. They then get a
> confirmation email when the backup completes.
I
On 6/28/2011 2:23 PM, Mike Hobbs wrote:
> I'm almost ready with putting bacula into production but I'm still
> debugging a few things and one of them is the "Device" line in my bacula
> mail reports, and I was hoping someone could help me with this.
>
> I'm running disk-based backups. Bacula 5.0.
Hi,
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> We're using Bacula for some backups with three SDs so far, and I wonder
> if it's possible somehow to allow for client / laptop backups in a good
> manner. As far as I can see, this will need to either be
> client-initiated, client saying "I'
On 06/28/2011 02:24 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> Hi all
>
> We're using Bacula for some backups with three SDs so far, and I wonder if
> it's possible somehow to allow for client / laptop backups in a good manner.
> As far as I can see, this will need to either be client-initiated, client
>
Hi all
We're using Bacula for some backups with three SDs so far, and I wonder if it's
possible somehow to allow for client / laptop backups in a good manner. As far
as I can see, this will need to either be client-initiated, client saying "I'm
alive!" or something, or having a polling process
Hi Out of curiosity, why do you do such "forklift replacements" when ZFS
supports replacing individual drives, letting the pool resilver and then
automatically grow to the new size? roy - Original Message -
> I have been using Bacula for over a year now and it has been providing
> 'passab
I'm almost ready with putting bacula into production but I'm still
debugging a few things and one of them is the "Device" line in my bacula
mail reports, and I was hoping someone could help me with this.
I'm running disk-based backups. Bacula 5.0.3, Vchanger 0.8.6 and a
16-bay Promise jbod.
I
Problem is not really just tape I/O speeds but the ability to get data
to it. I.e. the SD is running at about 50% cpu overhead right now
(single core) so it could possible handle (2) LTO4 drives assuming a new
SD is not spawned off per drive?
I don't really need 'rait' itself as that wou
How would the the various parts communicate if you're running multiple
instances on different ports? I would think just by creating multiple
jobs would create multiple socket streams and do the same thing.
On 2011-06-28 02:09, Christian Manal wrote:
- File daemon is single threaded so
2011/6/28 John Malone :
> Hi,
>
> output of client status at the same time as the log below:
> bristol-1622a6f-fd Version: 5.0.3 (04 August 2010) VSS Linux Cross-compile
> Win32
> Daemon started 28-Jun-11 08:21. Jobs: run=0 running=0.
> Heap: heap=0 smbytes=17,535 max_bytes=17,763 bufs=77 max_buf
On 6/27/2011 8:43 PM, Steve Costaras wrote:
>
>
>
>
> - How to stream a single job to multiple tape drives. Couldn't
> figure this out so that only one tape drive is being used.
>
There are hardware RAIT controllers available from Ultera
(http://www.ultera.com/tapesolutions.htm). A R
Hi all, bacula log show there has been an error ( Non-fatal FD errors).
No clue of what happened.
Where can I find more informations about it?
27-feb 01:52 fox2003-fd JobId 282: VSS Writer (BackupComplete):
"System Writer", State: 0x1 (VSS_WS_STABLE)
27-feb 01:53 mainbkp-sd JobId 282: Job write el
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:07:35 -0500, Troy Kocher said:
>
> All,
>
> I could really use some ideas..
>
> #bextract -d99 -i databaselist.rest -V DatabaseF-0027 /data/bacula /data/tmp
> bextract: stored_conf.c:698-0 Inserting director res: foobar-dir
> bextract: butil.c:282 Using devi
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:18:46 -0400, Dan Langille said:
>
> One of your basic assumptions is incorrect. I don't know what it is, but
> something, somewhere is wrong.
>
> Verify that your bacula-dir.conf configuration is correct.
I'd add:
Verify that your bacula-dir.conf configuration is
Hi,
output of client status at the same time as the log below:
bristol-1622a6f-fd Version: 5.0.3 (04 August 2010) VSS Linux Cross-compile
Win32
Daemon started 28-Jun-11 08:21. Jobs: run=0 running=0.
Heap: heap=0 smbytes=17,535 max_bytes=17,763 bufs=77 max_bufs=81
Sizeof: boffset_t=8 size_t=4
> - File daemon is single threaded so is limiting backup performance. Is there
> was a way to start more than one stream at the same time for a single machine
> backup? Right now I have all the file systems for a single client in the same
> file set.
>
> - Tied in with above, accurate backups
32 matches
Mail list logo