Op 20110926 om 20:49 schreef scar:
Martin Simmons @ 09/26/2011 11:10 AM:
Any particular types of file?
Check the ctimes (ls -lc).
most of the files are homemade audio recordings... mp3, wav, and flac.
the ctimes don't show any modification either.
I'm not sure if fat32 really has
Hi,
I recently made several changes to my network, and ever since my bacula backups
to the affected server error out after exactly 15 minutes. I don't know exactly
which change is the culprit, but I suspect it is somehow IPSec-related, and
would appreciate some help troubleshooting the
My two cent it's something related to tcpmss.
I remember I had some problems like that when I deployed my
strongswan setup (not sure if it was with bacula or any other
app).
If so, this is completely unrelated to bacula, try playing with
iptables TCPMSS
On Mon, September 26, 2011 10:29 am, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:16:31 -0400, Kim Culhan said:
As noted in a previous message, with a correct libtool it now produces
those warnings but
not when compiling with --disable-libtool.
OK.
However, I would expect ld to give a
Let's try another Q:
/usr/sbin/bacula-fd -d100 -c
/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf on the fd host and received this output when
connecting from the director...
bacula-fd: filed_conf.c:438-0 Inserting director res: bacula-director-mon
bacula-director-fd: jcr.c:132-0 read_last_jobs seek to 188
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:25 AM, JJ jjo...@cirrhus9.com wrote:
Let's try another Q:
/usr/sbin/bacula-fd -d100 -c
/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf on the fd host and received this output when
connecting from the director...
bacula-fd: filed_conf.c:438-0 Inserting director res: bacula-director-mon
Do you have Maximum Concurrent Jobs set in the Director and storage
sections in bacula-dir.conf?
I just added it to the storage section; it seems to have been removed
somehow.
Can someone please explain to me why bacula still is not able to run
concurrent Jobs? Do I have to create a storage
Hi
We are currently using a proprietary backup solution, and we evaluation
bacula to replace it.
We have some 100 hosts to backup up. The current work flow is like:
1. backup server backups host files over working time to a disk volume
on backup server.
2. During night, the disk volume is
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Boudewijn Ector
boudew...@boudewijnector.nl wrote:
Do you have Maximum Concurrent Jobs set in the Director and storage
sections in bacula-dir.conf?
I just added it to the storage section; it seems to have been removed
somehow.
Can someone please explain to
René Moser wrote:
Hi
We are currently using a proprietary backup solution,
Which proprietary backup system?
and we evaluation
bacula to replace it.
We have some 100 hosts to backup up. The current work flow is like:
Are these hosts PCs? What do they do? How much changes on them each
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, René Moser wrote:
We are currently using a proprietary backup solution, and we evaluation
bacula to replace it.
We have some 100 hosts to backup up. The current work flow is like:
1. backup server backups host files over working time to a disk volume
on backup
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 16:41 +0100, Alan Brown wrote:
We are currently using a proprietary backup solution,
Which proprietary backup system?
BRU Backup Server
We have some 100 hosts to backup up. The current work flow is like:
Are these hosts PCs? What do they do? How much changes on
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 16:51 +0100, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
It sounds like what you're looking for could be implemented as:
1. A normal Full/Differential/Incremental job to a disk-based storage
device to happen during the day.
2. A Migrate job to tape from disk to happen during the night.
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 16:51 +0100, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
2. It is apparently not possible to backup all 100 hosts straight to
tape, so you write them to disk first. Why is that? It sounds like
you're manually doing Spooling, which Bacula has transparent support
for. You could, in
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, René Moser wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 16:51 +0100, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
2. It is apparently not possible to backup all 100 hosts straight to
tape, so you write them to disk first. Why is that? It sounds like
you're manually doing Spooling, which Bacula has
Hi,
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, René Moser wrote:
Okay, it is not _really_ during day it is more like backups over night
to disk and backup to tape should be finished in the morning. But this
is just a detail. We did not have (yet) really (big) problems about
consistency. But as you say these
Hello,
I need some input on my backup strategy. Here is my setup:
1 - LTO3 24 slot autochanger with one drive.
1 - 6.5 TB Openfiler SAN
1 - 17 TB Openfiler SAN
30 Servers with around 8 TB of Data.
I am trying to figure out a backup schedule that will allow all the data to be
backed up
Thanks. I'm just running another full backup now so i'll look into the
timestamps next time i need to do a backup.
too bad such a crumby filesystem is the most compatible between various
operating systems...
--
All
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:37 PM, scar s...@drigon.com wrote:
Thanks. I'm just running another full backup now so i'll look into the
timestamps next time i need to do a backup.
too bad such a crumby filesystem is the most compatible between various
operating systems...
With the ntfs-3g
Hello,
my current job is the documentation of our bacula-installation.
Are there any useful sql commands like this:
select client and show me jobdefs, schedule, fileset,
or
select schedule and show me all associated jobs and clients?
Thanks for your help
Greetings
JHN
20 matches
Mail list logo
