Hi,
I'm at last ready to recreate my catalog after a disk failure. I've
posted previously about preparing for this. I've got a new fresh DB
setup but bscan is failing like so:
./bscan -V* -c /etc/bacula/bacula-sd.conf -v -s -m /dev/changer
bscan: butil.c:278 Could not find device "/dev/chang
Hello,
Bacula Community Release:
This is to let you know that we have released Bacula version 5.2.13 to
Source Forge. It is also in the git repository. You will find
a summary of the release, which has 20 bug fixes at the bottom of this
email.
Bacula Training:
If you want Bacula training, plea
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:12:35 +, GILES Stephen said:
>
> Thanks for the links.
> I have read a few of those bits, and figured it was backward compatible also.
> Just tried your suggestion and I get exactly the same error.
>
> It really has me stumped, and I'm surprised other people have
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:01:48 -0500
> "Michael Stauffer _g" wrote:
>
> > Regarding my situation of a corrupted catalog that I'm trying to
> > recover from.
> >
> > The only table that was reported problematic was Files, with the
> > Files.MYD unreadable.
> >
> > Can I do a bscan with all the oth
On 02/20/13 08:01, Michael Stauffer _g wrote:
> The only table that was reported problematic was Files, with the
> Files.MYD unreadable.
>
> Can I do a bscan with all the other tables and files in place to make it
> go faster? How would I do that? Would I leave Files.MYI also in place?
The index
On 02/20/13 04:17, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:17:30AM -0500, Michael Stauffer _g wrote:
>>
>> How do I setup the DB using InnoDB? I'm not seeing that in the docs. (I'm
>> sticking with bacula 3.0 for now, until I can get the catalog back and do
>> another full backup).
>>
>
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:01:48 -0500
"Michael Stauffer _g" wrote:
> Regarding my situation of a corrupted catalog that I'm trying to
> recover from.
>
> The only table that was reported problematic was Files, with the
> Files.MYD unreadable.
>
> Can I do a bscan with all the other tables and fi
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 08:01:48AM -0500, Michael Stauffer _g wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Regarding my situation of a corrupted catalog that I'm trying to recover
> from.
>
> The only table that was reported problematic was Files, with the Files.MYD
> unreadable.
>
> Can I do a bscan with all the
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:58:53AM -0500, Michael Stauffer _g wrote:
>
> So if I'm making a new empty database using the setup script in bacula, then
> I'll do this step - right?
Yep, you can also alter the create_mysql_tables.sql script directly I
believe.
All the best, Uwe
--
NIONEX ---
Hello,
2013/2/19 Tomasz Rozycki
> Ok. It's clear, so only solution for that is second directory instance.
>
You have to install a second instance of the client on that machine
(different port, config file, etc.) and define it in the Director.
best regards
--
Radosław Korzeniewski
rados...@kor
On 02/20/13 04:09, goorooj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have a strange problem with my backup through the firewall.
> i have a backup server with 16 slot autoloader inside my LAN.
> i have a pfsense betwen LAN and DMZ that does NAT, the DMZ uses a full public
> class C Network. the firewall between dmz and
Hi again,
Regarding my situation of a corrupted catalog that I'm trying to recover
from.
The only table that was reported problematic was Files, with the Files.MYD
unreadable.
Can I do a bscan with all the other tables and files in place to make it go
faster? How would I do that? Would I leav
> Message: 14
> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:17:08 +0100
> From: Uwe Schuerkamp
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Corrupted catalog on bad drive - please
> help!
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:17:30AM -0500, Michael Stauffer _g wrote:
> >
> > How do I setup the DB using InnoDB? I'm not seeing that
Zitat von Antony Mayi :
>>
>> From: Jérôme Blion
>> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Sent: Wednesday, 20 February 2013, 9:41
>> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] backup concurrency
>>
>> Le 2013-02-20 10:19, Antony Mayi a écrit :
>>> Hi community,
>>>
>>> I am
Hello,
On 15 February 2013 16:36, Simone Caronni wrote:
> the Fedora / RHEL / CentOS repository has been updated with a couple of
> small fixes related to the RHEL 7 branching, and as of today, Fedora 16 has
> been removed as it's End of Life.
>
> Fedora 17 and 18 packages are identical to those
>
> From: Jérôme Blion
>To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Wednesday, 20 February 2013, 9:41
>Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] backup concurrency
>
>Le 2013-02-20 10:19, Antony Mayi a écrit :
>> Hi community,
>>
>> I am running backups of multiple datab
Am 20.02.2013 10:19, schrieb Antony Mayi:
> I am running backups of multiple database servers and each backup job is
> defined with "RunScript" command that dumps the databases on each
> particular server and these dumps are then taken for backups.
> [...] Since the dumping doesn't involve bacula s
Le 2013-02-20 10:19, Antony Mayi a écrit :
> Hi community,
>
> I am running backups of multiple database servers and each backup job
> is defined with "RunScript" command that dumps the databases on each
> particular server and these dumps are then taken for backups.
>
> The dumps take different ti
Hi community,
I am running backups of multiple database servers and each backup job is
defined with "RunScript" command that dumps the databases on each particular
server and these dumps are then taken for backups.
The dumps take different times on each server - minutes to couple of hours.
Sin
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:17:30AM -0500, Michael Stauffer _g wrote:
>
> How do I setup the DB using InnoDB? I'm not seeing that in the docs. (I'm
> sticking with bacula 3.0 for now, until I can get the catalog back and do
> another full backup).
>
Hello Michael,
I can only answer this questi
Op 20130218 om 14:54 schreef Dan Langille:
> I'm trying to add Python support to the FreeBSD port. I'm working on a PR
> submitted to FreeBSD, but
> I'm getting a link error.
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/171818
>
> Any ideas? Full link output at the above URL.
>
> The m
Hi,
i have a strange problem with my backup through the firewall.
i have a backup server with 16 slot autoloader inside my LAN.
i have a pfsense betwen LAN and DMZ that does NAT, the DMZ uses a full public
class C Network. the firewall between dmz and the webz therefore does no NAT.
i have a rule
22 matches
Mail list logo
