> Hi,
Hello Sergio,
> I don't understand why sometimes autolabeling doesn't work. I wonder if
> this the expected behaviour:
Maximum Volumes = 1 (?)
Regards,
--
Heitor Medrado de Faria | CEO Bacula do Brasil & USA | Visto EB-1 | LPIC-III |
EMC 05-001 | ITIL-F
• Não seja tarifado pelo
Hi,
I had to rebuild the domain a couple weeks ago. Everything works for Bacula
except for two systems. One is a log server and the other is my work
station. Both are getting the same errors. I am not sure why because all
of the other systems in the domain are being backed up without any
Hi,
I don't understand why sometimes autolabeling doesn't work. I wonder if
this the expected behaviour:
19-jun 10:57 DEBIAN01-dir JobId 381: Start Backup JobId 381,
Job=BackupMtaCuarto.2018-06-19_10.57.08_06
19-jun 10:57 DEBIAN01-dir JobId 381: Using Device "WStorage4" to write.
19-jun
Hello Davide
Yes. I followed all of your steps.
Enviado de Motorola Moto X2
Wanderlei Hüttel
Em qua, 27 de jun de 2018 08:29, Davide Franco
escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> This is really strange ...
>
> Here's below my repo configuration
>
> [Bacula]
> name=Bacula - Community
>
Hello Davide
Yes. I followed all of your Stela.
Enviado de Motorola Moto X2
Wanderlei Hüttel
Em qua, 27 de jun de 2018 08:29, Davide Franco
escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> This is really strange ...
>
> Here's below my repo configuration
>
> [Bacula]
> name=Bacula - Community
>
Hi,
I test quickly this morning ( another time ... sorry ) and not install the
Bacula-postgresql 9.0.8 :(
Note : on my CentOs 7 /var/yum/cache -> /var/cache/yum
Note2 : the Gpgkey is not necessary for the test and for me gpgcheck=0
At my work, i test with an VM from scratch install ( CentOs
Hello Erik,
Thanks for your question.
Definitively yes, this is something I can do within the next weeks.
I'll let you know when Fedora 28 binary packages will be available.
Best regards
Davide
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> Will there be binaries for fedora 28
Hello,
This is really strange ...
Here's below my repo configuration
[Bacula]
name=Bacula - Community
baseurl=http://www.bacula.org/packages//rpms/9.0.8/el7/x86_64
enabled=1
protect=0
gpgcheck=1
Then when I install bacula-postgresql
# yum install bacula-postgresql
Loaded plugins:
Hello
In the chapter 15, the correct command to import bacula key is:
rpm --import Bacula-4096-Distribution-Verification-key.asc
Instead: rpm --import add Bacula-4096-Distribution-Verification-key.asc
I've followed Davide steps but MariaDB packages are still been showed as
dependencies
Will there be binaries for fedora 28 which has been available in more than half
a year?
--
Regards,
Erik P. Olsen
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
Hello,
It does works fine for me.
Try to clean up your local yum cache and try again please.
$ sudo yum clean all
$ sudo rm -rm /var/yum/cache
& sudo yum check-update
Hope it helps
Davide
On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 at 10:33, Olivier Delestre <
olivier.deles...@univ-rouen.fr> wrote:
> And i test
And i test quickly and :(
Thanks for your works :)
---
My Bacula.repo
[Bacula-Community]
name=CentOS - Bacula - Community
baseurl=http://bacula.org/packages//rpms/9.0.8/el7/x86_64
enabled=1
protect=0
gpgcheck=0
---
yum install bacula-postgresql
Loaded plugins: etckeeper,
Hello,
The MySQL dependency problem on bacula-postgresql rpm package has been
fixed now.
rpm binary packages for rhel7-64 (compatible with Centos 7) are now
available in Bacula repository.
The package name is bacula-postgresql-9.0.8-2.el7
More rpm based distro packages will be uploaded within
13 matches
Mail list logo
